One Small Card, One Big Question That Changed a Life

A lung cancer summit taught Jacqui and Donel King about biomarker testing, helping them

By Milton Kirby | Old Hickory, TN | August 25, 2026

Jacqui and Donel King were attending a lung cancer summit in New Orleans when, near the end of the event, Jacqui stopped at an information table.

One card remained on the table.

It looked ordinary, about the size of a business card, folded like a small tent. There was nothing about its appearance to suggest that the information inside would soon become worth its weight in gold to the Kings.

Inside was information about biomarkers associated with lung cancer and questions patients could take to their doctors to get answers.

Jacqui picked up the last card brought it home and then took it to her husband’s next appointment with his oncologist.

What happened next helped change the conversation surrounding Donel King’s Stage 4 lung cancer diagnosis.

The Kings walked into the appointment prepared to ask whether biomarker testing had been performed.

It had.

They just didn’t know it.

The testing had identified a KRAS G12C mutation in Donel’s cancer, a molecular characteristic for which a targeted treatment was available.

For Jacqui, the moment demonstrated something she now believes every patient and caregiver needs to know and understand.

“You don’t know how to advocate for yourself if you don’t know what it is that you’re looking for,” she said.

Before Cancer Took Center Stage

Cancer is now part of the Kings’ daily lives.

But that’s not where their story began.

Donel and Jacqui met in Houston more than three decades ago. Both were single parents, and their marriage brought together a blended family.

Jacqui’s life became increasingly centered on ministry and leadership in the United Methodist Church. Donel describes his role throughout much of their marriage as supporting that calling while pursuing his own entrepreneurial interests.

Their life together took them through Texas, Tennessee and Illinois.

They also endured major events long before lung cancer entered their lives.

While serving in Port Arthur, Texas, the Kings experienced the devastating 2005 hurricane season. Their church and community dealt with families displaced by Hurricane Katrina and then faced hurricanes that affected their own area.

Jacqui remembers the period as one of ministry, survival, rebuilding and prayer.

Donel brought another life experience to the marriage.

He is an Air Force veteran who served in air traffic control.

Donel would learn much later in life that he was dyslexic, finally putting a name to difficulties he had experienced years earlier. Decades later, cancer would confront him with another lesson about the power of knowing exactly what you are dealing with.

He also spent years as an entrepreneur and describes himself as someone who enjoys technology, business, gardening and community service.

He calls himself a “Renaissance man.”

And cancer was not completely new to him.

Donel was diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2009 and underwent removal of his prostate.

They were unaware that years later, another cancer was growing inside him.

A Fall Changes Everything

By 2025, Donel had experienced pain in his shoulder and hip. A simple X-ray had not revealed the cause.

He underwent regular physical examinations and was frustrated that nothing had identified the cancer earlier.

Then, in October 2025, while the Kings were living in Springfield, Illinois, Donel’s leg gave way while walking down a flight of stairs.

He fell. The fall fractured his femur and badly damaged his hip.

Further medical evaluation revealed something far more serious.

Stage 4 lung cancer.

The cancer had spread beyond his lung, metastasizing to his hip and shoulder. Donel could no longer walk.

Their lives changed almost immediately.

Physicians in Illinois told the couple Donel needed specialized orthopedic oncology care that was not available locally. They worked to get him back to the Nashville area, where he could receive care through the VA and other specialists.

After returning home, Donel entered rehabilitation while doctors simultaneously confronted the cancer and the severe damage to his hip.

The first biopsy in Illinois failed to provide enough tissue for all of the testing doctors needed, Jacqui said.

Then came major surgery.

Rebuilding a Hip While Fighting Cancer

On February 18, 2026, Donel underwent an operation to reconstruct his hip and pelvis.

He remembers an eight-hour surgery that would begin rebuilding the structure of an extensively damaged hip that might allow him to walk again.

Doctors also obtained additional tissue. That tissue would later become important to Donel’s cancer story

Meanwhile, Donel begin cancer treatment that consisted of radiation, chemotherapy and infusion therapy. Donel remembers what chemotherapy did to him physically.

His hair disappeared.

So did the black beard he loved.

Jacqui looked at him during the interview and offered a reminder of what mattered more.

“But he’s still here.”

Donel responded:

“I’m still here.”

But the treatments were difficult the cancer was not responding as they had hoped.

Jacqui was began her search for treatment options, something she knows how to do.

Jacqui Starts Looking for Answers

Jacqui had previously researched lung cancer resources after the wife of a colleague was diagnosed with lung cancer.

When Donel was diagnosed, she returned to that research.

This time, she searched specifically for organizations working with African Americans and lung cancer.

She found the HEAL Collaborative.

HEAL focuses on health education and advocacy, including efforts to provide patients and caregivers with information they can use to navigate cancer care. Its lung cancer resources include information about screening, treatment, clinical trials, biomarker testing and self-advocacy.

Jacqui contacted the organization and learned about HEAL’s annual Lung Cancer Patient & Caregiver Summit.

The Kings registered and began planning their trip to attend HEAL’s 2026 3rd Annual Summit in New Orleans.

The 2026 gathering was designed specifically to address the needs of Black communities affected by lung cancer. HEAL brought patients and caregivers together with healthcare professionals, researchers, advocates and community leaders for discussions about early detection, personalized treatment, clinical trials and patient advocacy.

For Donel and Jacqui, those subjects were not theoretical.

They were living them.

Getting to New Orleans was not automatic.

Donel had recently undergone major surgery and needed medical clearance to travel.

They got it.

And they went.

That trip would introduce the Kings to a word that would become central to their cancer journey:

Biomarker testing.

What Is a Biomarker?

Cancer is not necessarily the same disease in every person who receives the same broad diagnosis.

A biomarker is a biological characteristic that can provide doctors with information about a cancer. In some cancers, testing can identify specific molecular changes that may help physicians determine whether a targeted treatment is appropriate.

For a patient, the distinction can be simplified.

Biomarker Individual Results

A cancer diagnosis identifies the disease.

Biomarker testing tells doctors more about the particular characteristics of that patient’s cancer.

And targeted therapy acts against a particular target or characteristic.

The Kings did not understand that distinction before New Orleans.

The Last Card on the Table

At the Summit, the Kings attended a breakout session about biomarker testing.

The message they carried away was direct: patients with lung cancer should ask for a biomarker test that will provide information about the specific characteristics of their cancer, so their doctor can consider more personalized treatment options.

That was what sent Jacqui to the Amgen table, one of the pharmaceutical companies supporting the Summit.

There she found the wallet-sized card containing information about biomarkers associated with non-small cell lung cancer. Jacqui took the last one on the table.

She decided that when they returned home, the card was going with them to Donel’s next oncology appointment.

They were going to ask questions.

But the story took an unexpected turn.

The Kings did not return home, request biomarker testing and then wait for a laboratory to perform it.

The testing had apparently already been done.

They simply did not know it.

“An Awakening on Both Sides”

Additional tissue obtained during Donel’s hip surgery had been sent for laboratory analysis.

By the time the Kings walked into the oncology appointment with their card, biomarker testing had identified KRAS G12C in Donel’s cancer.

Jacqui remembers putting the card into the conversation and learning that the result was already there.

She called the moment “an awakening on both sides.”

NSCLC – Results

The Kings had arrived intending to ask whether the test should be performed.

Instead, the conversation became about what the completed test had found and what could be done with that information.

The KRAS gene helps regulate cell growth. Some cancers carry a particular alteration known as KRAS G12C.

That distinction mattered because medicines have been developed to target KRAS G12C.

One of those targeted treatments is Lumakras, or sotorasib, manufactured by Amgen.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Lumakras in 2021 for certain adults with KRAS G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. The FDA labeling calls for patients to be selected based on the presence of the KRAS G12C mutation determined by an FDA-approved test.

That is the type of targeted treatment Donel’s biomarker result made possible for his physicians to consider.

The medication is not a cure.

Donel understands that.                                                                                                                     

But to him, it represented another option.

The “Silver Bullet”

Donel has his own name for the treatment.

He calls it his “silver bullet.”

He is quick to explain what he means.

He does not believe the pill simply makes Stage 4 cancer disappear.

His hope is that the therapy can stop the cancer from progressing or cause tumors to shrink.

Donel says he feels much better since moving away from chemotherapy and beginning the targeted treatment.

He is also being monitored.

Blood work is part of his routine. CT scans will help his physicians determine whether the tumors are shrinking, remaining stable or progressing.

Asked what he wants those scans to show, Donel did not give a complicated answer.

“My hope is that it’s not moving,” he said. “That’s my goal.”

Caregiving Wasn’t in the Retirement Plan

The story is not Donel’s alone.

Cancer changed Jacqui’s life too.

Her retirement was supposed to begin a different season.

Instead, she became caregiver, researcher, medical navigator, household manager and advocate while simultaneously dealing with grief and a major move.

Her mother had been ill and died during the same larger period of upheaval.

The Kings were also moving back from Illinois to Tennessee.

Donel was in hospitals and rehabilitation facilities.

Jacqui dealt with packing, moving, selling a house, setting up their Tennessee home, arranging medical equipment and keeping track of appointments.

“Caregiving wasn’t on my retirement,” she said.

At another point she summed up the experience even more simply:

“There’s no script for this.”

Yet sitting with the Kings revealed something that a list of caregiving responsibilities could not.

After more than 30 years of marriage and 33 years as a couple, Donel and Jacqui still displayed the easy affection of people discovering each other. They finished each other’s sentences and sometimes started the same thought at the same time. They gazed at one another as the other spoke. More than once, Jacqui looked at Donel, smiled and seemed, for a moment, almost giddy.

It was an unexpected sight in an interview about Stage 4 lung cancer.

Their story was about biomarker testing, targeted therapy and caregiving. But sitting across from the Kings, another story was unfolding in plain sight.

This was also a love story.

The couple learned to accept help.

Friends and colleagues organized meals.

Neighbors helped with equipment.

The VA helped with transportation to medical appointments.

Their church and broader community prayed.

And Jacqui learned something caregivers sometimes resist.

“You can’t do it by yourself,” she said.

Information Is Only Half the Job

The Kings credit HEAL Collaborative with putting information in front of them that they did not previously understand and how to be your own advocate.

But Jacqui believes attending a conference is not enough.

“If you get the information, that’s half of the game because then you’ve got to follow through,” she said.

In the Kings’ case, the chain is unusually clear.

HEAL created the setting where they learned why biomarker testing mattered.

At an Amgen table, Jacqui picked up the last card explaining what they should ask about.

Back home, that question led them into a conversation about a KRAS G12C result already in Donel’s medical record.

And that result helped identify a targeted treatment option.

 But none of those steps happened in isolation.

Information had to reach the patient.

The patient and caregiver had to understand why it mattered.

They had to take that information back to the people providing Donel’s medical care.

And physicians had to determine the appropriate treatment.

That may be the central lesson of the Kings’ experience.

The laboratory had information about Donel’s cancer.

His medical team had access to that information.

The Kings had attended appointments.

What changed after New Orleans was their ability to participate in the conversation differently.

They knew the word biomarker.

They had a card.

They had questions.

And they knew they were supposed to ask them.

There is an important nuance.

The Kings’ account does not establish that Donel’s physicians had overlooked the biomarker result or would not have discussed targeted therapy without the card. Jacqui said the medical team appeared to be preparing to talk with them about what could come next.

What the Summit and the card clearly changed was the Kings’ understanding of the conversation.

They arrived knowing what to ask.

Tennessee Expands Biomarker Coverage

The Kings’ experience comes as Tennessee is changing its insurance rules surrounding biomarker testing.

Tennessee enacted legislation in 2026 requiring specified health plans to provide biomarker-testing coverage beginning with plans issued, amended or renewed on or after January 1, 2027. The law includes TennCare coverage when biomarker testing is medically necessary.

The law does not mandate biomarker testing to screen people without symptoms. Its coverage provisions address testing used for diagnosis, treatment, disease management or monitoring when applicable requirements are met.

The distinction is important.

Lung cancer screening and biomarker testing are not the same thing.

Screening is intended to identify lung cancer in people who meet established eligibility criteria before symptoms develop.

Biomarker testing can help physicians make treatment decisions after cancer is identified.

For the Kings, understanding those differences has become part of learning to navigate cancer.

The Losses Cancer Creates

Stage 4 cancer has taken more from Donel than hair.

It took mobility.

For months he could not walk.

It interrupted his businesses.

It pulled him away from volunteer work, gardening and the other activities of a man who describes himself as hands-on.

Donel calls those losses a form of grief.

He had been an active man.

Suddenly, much of his life required other people to do things for him.

“For the moment, I just said, well, I just got to step back and take my hands off of them and just kind of go with the flow,” he said.

Still, optimism comes easily to him.

He calls himself a “perpetual optimist.”

“When I see manure, I’m looking for the pony,” he said.

That optimism now has specific goals.

One is walking again.

Donel continues physical therapy and believes he is getting closer.

Another is traveling.

During one appointment, someone asked him a question he was not expecting:

What are you going to do with the time you have?

It stopped him.

Now he has answers.

He wants to take a train across the country.

He wants to travel.

He talks about Egypt.

Cancer has forced him to think about time differently.

Faith, Medicine and the Road Ahead

Faith runs through nearly every chapter of the Kings’ story.

Jacqui is a minister.

Donel speaks openly about God.

They describe prayer surrounding his surgery, treatment and recovery.

But their faith has not meant waiting passively.

Jacqui searched.

They traveled.

They listened.

They carried information home.

They asked questions.

Donel continued treatment.

Jacqui continued caregiving.

And both continued learning.

They see no contradiction between prayer and medicine.

For Jacqui, vulnerability also became part of the lesson.

When people ask how things are going, caregivers do not always have to say everything is fine.

Sometimes, she said, the answer needs to be:

Not great today.

I need help today.

Healing, she believes, sometimes requires letting other people into the struggle.

For Donel, the future remains uncertain.

Stage 4 lung cancer is still Stage 4 lung cancer.

The next CT scan matters.

So does the next physical therapy session.

So does the possibility of taking another step without assistance.

But he is no longer talking only about treatment.

He is talking about where he wants to go.

What he wants to see.

What he wants to do with the days in front of him.

Cancer has forced Donel King to surrender control over much of his life.

It has not taken his sense of possibility.

“I’m alive,” he said. “God has spared me another day. And I’m just going to get up and do the best I can with that day.”

And for now, he is waiting for the next scan with one straightforward hope:

“My hope is that it’s not moving.”

The HEAL Collaborative is based in Atlanta, GA. To learn more, please visit: www.healcollaborative.org.

Related articles

Six Blocks That Changed the Conversation About Lung Health

A Celebration of Hope Inspires Birmingham’s Community Conversation on Lung Cancer

Part I – “Anyone With Lungs”: Understanding the Hidden Realities of Lung Cancer

Part II – “Your Lungs Are Talking”: How the Respiratory System Works – and What It Tells Us

Part III – “From Awareness to Action”: Communities Confront Lung Cancer Together

Support open, independent journalism. Your contribution helps us tell the stories that matter most.

Love, Patrick: BronzeLens Opening Night Brings a Fashion Pioneer Back Into the Spotlight

BronzeLens opened with Love, Patrick: Nothing is Impossible, introducing a new generation to fashion pioneer Patrick Kelly’s extraordinary journey from Mississippi to Paris.

By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | August 22, 2026

Opening night of the BronzeLens Film Festival belonged to Patrick Kelly.

Hours before Love, Patrick: Nothing is Impossible was scheduled to make its world premiere, however, co-director Ryon Horne was worried.

His phone had been buzzing with messages from people telling him they could not make it.

After helping bring the story of the Mississippi-born fashion designer to the screen, Horne found himself confronting one of a filmmaker’s most basic opening-night fears.

Would anybody show up?

“I don’t even know how to explain it,” Horne said later. “You get nervous about these things, because, like, is anybody going to come?”

He got his answer when he arrived at the Tara Atlanta Theatre.

The house was packed.

“And then when you come, you realize the most important people in your life that needed to support this film on this day are here,” Horne said.

They came for opening night of the 17th annual BronzeLens Film Festival and the world premiere of Love, Patrick: Nothing is Impossible, a documentary about a Black designer from Mississippi whose journey took him from the American South to the highest levels of Paris fashion. BronzeLens listed the film as its 6:45 p.m. opening-night world premiere. (BronzeLens Atlanta Film Festival, Inc)

Before the film began, BronzeLens founder and executive producer Kathleen Bertrand welcomed the audience and introduced Jason Gregory, interim director of programming.

Festival organizers had encouraged opening-night guests to arrive “Runway Ready,” and many accepted the invitation. Before the theater lights dimmed, the Tara lobby had become a fashion showcase of its own, a fitting prelude to a film about a designer who believed clothes should bring joy.

But by the time the film ended and the conversation inside the theater began, opening night had become about something larger than a movie premiere.

It was about remembering Patrick Kelly.

And for some people in the audience, it was about discovering him for the first time.

From Mississippi to Paris

Patrick Kelly grew up in Mississippi surrounded by women who helped shape both his personality and his fashion.

His grandmother, Ethel Rainey, was especially influential.

She gave him old copies of Vogue and Harper’s Bazaar when he was a child. She took him to Black Baptist church, where Kelly noticed the women dressed from head to toe in their Sunday best.

Even one of Kelly’s most recognizable design signatures had roots in his Mississippi childhood.

His grandmother mended his shirts with mismatched buttons.

Years later, colorful buttons would become unmistakably Patrick Kelly. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

Kelly moved to Atlanta in 1974, where he volunteered to design window displays for Yves Saint Laurent Rive Gauche. Atlanta became another stop on a journey that eventually took him to New York and then Paris. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

New York proved difficult.

Paris changed everything.

Kelly moved to France in late 1979. His skinny, body-conscious dresses decorated with colorful buttons eventually attracted the attention of French Elle, which featured his first commercial collection in February 1985. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

His designs were bold, playful and unmistakably his.

Buttons became a signature.

So did bright colors, bows, body-hugging dresses and humor.

But there was something else.

Kelly wanted his clothes worn by real people.

The Philadelphia Museum of Art’s Patrick Kelly retrospective says he wanted women of all ages to love their bodies and created designs that celebrated different shapes and sizes. His own “Love List” explicitly included women across body types. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

That philosophy was visible in the documentary.

Kelly’s runways featured Black models and women whose bodies did not always conform to the narrow image traditionally associated with high fashion.

He was not merely putting Black models on a runway.

He was putting a broader vision of Black beauty there.

Then came history.

In 1988, Kelly became thefirst American and first Black designer voted into the prestigious Chambre Syndicale du Prêt-à-Porter des Couturiers et des Créateurs de Mode. His admission was sponsored by Pierre Bergé, cofounder of Yves Saint Laurent, and designer Sonia Rykiel. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

For a Black man from Mississippi, it was an extraordinary ascent.

It was also painfully brief.

Kelly died in Paris on Jan. 1, 1990, from AIDS. He was 35. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

More than three decades later, his clothes remain in museum collections and have been the subject of major exhibitions. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

Yet his name is unfamiliar to many Americans.

That contradiction sits near the heart of Love, Patrick.

“I Had No Knowledge of Patrick Kelly”

Stephanie Proctor Johnson, an executive producer of the documentary and operations manager for the Horne Brothers, made a striking admission after the premiere.

“I had no knowledge of Patrick Kelly,” she said.

Johnson said she first learned about him when the film project came to the Horne Brothers.

Even after becoming involved, she said the filmmaking team had to learn the magnitude of what Kelly had accomplished.

“I don’t think as a designer, none of us realized the essence of what he had done,” she said.

That experience was reflected in the audience.

Some people at the Tara knew Kelly’s story.

Yolanda Durbin was one of them.

Durbin attended fashion school after Kelly’s death and remembers professors discussing him.

“I’m glad he is getting the notoriety that he deserves,” she said.

Others were meeting Patrick Kelly for the first time.

That raises an uncomfortable question.

How does an American designer become the first American and first Black designer voted into one of the most important organizations in French fashion, attract international attention and work with some of the world’s most recognizable models, yet become unfamiliar to another generation?

Love, Patrick does not merely celebrate Kelly’s success.

It attempts to put his name back into circulation.

Bringing Patrick Kelly’s Story to the Screen

The Patrick Kelly project had been developing for years.

Johnson said executive producers Ray Cornelius and Jessica Manning met with Ryon Horne in early 2025. By that summer, the larger Horne Brothers team had committed to the production.

The filmmakers traveled to Paris, following Kelly’s path and speaking with people connected to his life and work.

The project also had an important connection to Kelly himself through Bjorn Guil Amelan, Kelly’s former life and business partner. The Philadelphia Museum of Art identifies Amelan and Bill T. Jones as the donors behind a promised gift of approximately 80 Kelly ensembles featured in its Runway of Love retrospective. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

Making the documentary required the kind of resourcefulness familiar to independent filmmakers.

“We did it on a bootstrap,” Johnson said.

For Latrisha Horne, Ryon’s wife, the project meant watching a familiar transformation at home.

When Ryon becomes immersed in a film, she said, he goes into “work mode.”

“He works in the studio and we may not see him months at a time because he’s so dedicated to the project,” she said.

Latrisha traveled to Paris during production and, for the first time, watched her husband working on location.

“I was like a little kid,” she recalled.

Now that the film has premiered, she wants its reach to grow.

“It needs to get on Netflix or a streaming platform so that more people can be exposed,” she said. “It needs to be seen by so many people.”

The Smile

For all the history contained in the documentary, one characteristic of Patrick Kelly repeatedly commanded attention.

His smile.

It turns out the smile was also part of his design philosophy.

Kelly often expressed a simple goal: he wanted his clothes to make people smile. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

His life was hardly free from struggle.

Kelly grew up in Mississippi during the 1950s and 1960s. He later navigated race as a Black man in the international fashion industry. His career required leaving the United States before he found his greatest professional success.

And his life ended during the devastation of the AIDS epidemic.

Yet on screen, Kelly repeatedly smiled.

Johnson noticed it.

So did Dr. Courtney A. Hammonds, who participated in the documentary.

Kelly’s personality, Johnson said, seemed “contagious.”

She remembered another sentiment expressed by Kelly in the film:

“I just want to have fun.”

The joy was reflected in his clothes.

Kelly used bright colors, buttons, bows and humor. He brought his Southern roots into Paris fashion and mixed them with influences from Black culture, fashion history and the club scenes of New York and Paris. (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

Hammonds saw something larger in Kelly’s smile.

“The smile can transcend everything,” Hammonds said.

More Than a Documentary

For Hammonds, Love, Patrick is ultimately about storytelling.

Hammonds credited the Horne Brothers, Manning, Cornelius and the larger production team with bringing together people who could contribute different pieces to Kelly’s story.

But Hammonds also challenged the audience to think about what happens after a story has been recovered.

“We can excavate a story, but now it’s up to the next generation to do something with that,” Hammonds said.

That may be one of the central questions Love, Patrick leaves behind.

What do people do once they know?

Hammonds believes Kelly’s story can resonate even with people who had never heard his name.

He was a Southerner.

He came from a small Mississippi city.

And he reached one of the biggest stages imaginable in his profession.

“We have a cousin in Vicksburg,” Hammonds said. “We have a cousin in Alabama. We have a cousin in Atlanta.”

Kelly’s journey, in that sense, becomes more than fashion history.

It becomes a story about possibility.

Hammonds suggested there is still much more for audiences to discover.

“Patrick Kelly is more than a monolith,” Hammonds said. “He’s really an encyclopedia that’s yet to be read.”

Why BronzeLens Matters

That story found an appropriate stage at BronzeLens.

Founded in 2009, the nonprofit festival is dedicated to promoting Atlanta as a film center for people of color, showcasing films created by people of color and providing networking opportunities to develop future filmmakers. BronzeLens is also an Oscar-qualifying festival in the short-film category. (BronzeLens Atlanta Film Festival, Inc)

Atlanta-based filmmaker Adelin Gasana sees the festival as more than a screening opportunity.

Gasana, whose documentary Brannu was also screening during the festival, said this is his third year participating in BronzeLens. He said the experience has helped him learn about film marketing, meet people and see strong independent films.

That kind of infrastructure matters at a time when independent filmmakers increasingly must find creative ways to finance, market and distribute their work.

Gasana particularly welcomed BronzeLens’ expanded emphasis on Georgia filmmakers this year.

For him, local filmmaking does not necessarily mean telling small stories.

His own documentary examines land, agriculture, development pressure and questions about what happens when competing visions of progress collide.

Love, Patrick likewise stretches far beyond Atlanta.

But its connections to the city run deep.

Kelly spent formative years here before Paris. The Horne Brothers are Atlanta filmmakers. And now Atlanta has hosted the documentary’s world premiere.

The result is a story that can travel internationally while remaining rooted in the South.

“Nothing Is Impossible”

The title of the documentary carries its own story.

Patrick Kelly is buried at Père Lachaise Cemetery in Paris.

Inscribed on his headstone are three words:

“Nothing Is Impossible.” (Philadelphia Museum of Art)

More than three decades after Kelly’s death, those words have become part of the title of a film carrying his story to another generation.

And the Tara premiere is intended to be a beginning rather than an ending.

Johnson said the filmmakers plan to take Love, Patrick to additional festivals and screenings, including Charleston, Orlando and Washington, D.C.

But two planned stops carry particular significance.

Vicksburg.

And Jackson State University.

The boy who left Mississippi and eventually conquered Paris is being carried home on film.

For Ryon Horne, that journey began with the uncertainty of whether anyone would show up for the world premiere.

They did.

The Tara was full.

But filling a theater for one night is different from restoring someone’s place in history.

The filmmakers understand that.

So did people leaving the theater.

Cynthia Sumpter was among those who heard the call to carry Kelly’s story beyond BronzeLens.

Asked what she planned to do with what she had just learned, Sumpter didn’t offer a grand strategy.

She thought about the people she knew.

Then she decided where she would begin.

“First, I’m going to contact my sister,” she said.

For a film trying to put Patrick Kelly’s name back into the world, perhaps that is exactly how it starts.

Related articles

BronzeLens Enters a New Era with Expanded Festival, New Leadership and a Focus on Building Black Cinema

What Is AutoLore?

AutoLore™ is a continuity architecture that preserves coherence, lineage, and accountability in intelligent systems, governing context before AI interpretation, generation, or action occurs.

By Florita Bell Griffin, Ph.D | Houston, TX | January 22, 2026

Inventor of AutoLore™ · AutoLore™ is owned by ARC Communications, LLC

AutoLore™ is a continuity architecture. Its purpose is to preserve coherence, lineage, and integrity as real-world events, data, and decisions move through intelligent systems over time. AutoLore prepares raw inputs into continuity-verified representations before any interpretation, generation, or action occurs. By governing preparation rather than performance, AutoLore stabilizes systems across scale, transfer, and change.

Modern intelligent systems are optimized for output. They predict, personalize, and adapt with impressive speed. Yet as systems evolve, context fragments, sequence blurs, and decisions become harder to trace. What remains may continue to function, but it no longer holds together. AutoLore exists to address this structural failure mode by treating continuity itself as a first-class architectural concern.

AutoLore operates as a preparation layer positioned between raw event intake and downstream system use. Instead of allowing each component to infer its own understanding of events, AutoLore standardizes how events enter the system. It produces continuity-ready representations designed for durable use across time, environments, and ownership. These representations carry the information required to preserve context without exposing raw inputs or forcing downstream interpretation.

At the core of AutoLore is disciplined preparation. Real-world events are received through a defined intake interface. Continuity attributes are extracted. Lineage relationships are established so sequence and causality remain intact. Transition states are classified to reflect change rather than overwrite history. Boundaries are defined to govern how prepared representations may be consumed downstream. The output is a structured representation designed to remain coherent as systems evolve.

This approach allows downstream systems to operate with clarity. Models, interfaces, and services consume prepared representations rather than raw events, which supports auditability, provenance, and long-range integrity. Routing and flow control can occur without interpretation, preserving determinism and reducing drift. Over time, this yields systems that remain recognizable even as components are replaced or upgraded.

AutoLore is intentionally distinct from performance-oriented intelligence. It does not predict outcomes, personalize behavior, or generate meaning. Instead, it governs the conditions under which meaning, action, and expression can remain coherent. This distinction enables AutoLore to function across domains wherever continuity must survive scale and change, including intelligent vehicles, AI platforms, robotics, data systems, and complex infrastructures.

AutoLore includes a core subsystem responsible for governed expressive output: Arjent AI Voice Architecture™. This subsystem ensures that when a system explains, narrates, or communicates, its output remains aligned with continuity-prepared inputs. Expression is governed by structure, lineage, and boundary rules rather than repetition or reinterpretation, preserving consistency across time and context.

AutoLore is a foundational architecture created to govern continuity before intelligence acts and before meaning is produced. Developed by ARC Communications, LLC, AutoLore defines a new category of system architecture centered on continuity preparation rather than downstream correction.

Fifty Real Problems AutoLore Resolves

The following questions reflect recurring failures observed in large-scale intelligent systems. Each illustrates a condition that emerges when continuity, lineage, and governed transition are absent. AutoLore addresses these problems by preserving coherence before interpretation, generation, or action occurs.

Why do large AI systems behave inconsistently across versions even when trained on the same data?
A: › Because lineage between model states, data contexts, and decision boundaries is reconstructed after the fact instead of preserved. AutoLore carries continuity forward explicitly, so each transition retains its governing context.

Why does internal AI governance break down once systems scale across teams?
A: › Governance fails when context ownership fragments. AutoLore enforces continuity before interpretation, keeping authority intact as systems cross organizational boundaries.

Why do audit trails fail under regulatory scrutiny?
A: › Logs describe outcomes rather than causality. AutoLore preserves lineage at the moment of transition, making audits evidentiary rather than inferential.

Why do safety teams disagree with product teams about what a system knew at a given time?
A: › Because memory is inferred rather than fixed. AutoLore locks continuity states so interpretation never rewrites history.

Why do autonomous systems drift even when performance metrics improve?
A: › Optimization rewards local success rather than identity preservation. AutoLore defines invariants that adaptation cannot override.

Why does system behavior change after infrastructure migrations?
A: › Context is stripped during translation. AutoLore treats migrations as continuity events rather than data moves.

Why do long-lived platforms lose coherence after acquisitions?
A: › Institutional memory is undocumented and informal. AutoLore embeds lineage into the system itself.

Why is AI explainability unreliable months after deployment?
A: › Explanations are regenerated using present context. AutoLore preserves original interpretive conditions.

Why do compliance teams rely on manual documentation for automated systems?
A: › Automation lacks continuity guarantees. AutoLore provides machine-verifiable lineage.

Why does “human in the loop” fail at scale?
A: › Humans intervene without preserved context. AutoLore ensures interventions occur inside governed continuity frames.

Why do robotics systems behave differently in identical environments?
A: › Environmental context is flattened into sensor data. AutoLore preserves situational lineage.

Why do simulation-trained systems fail in real-world deployment?
A: › Simulation lacks continuity with reality. AutoLore binds simulated and real transitions.

Why do multi-modal systems struggle to reconcile conflicting inputs?
A: › Inputs lack shared lineage. AutoLore resolves conflicts through continuity hierarchy.

Why does retraining erase prior safety learnings?
A: › Safety knowledge is not preserved as invariant. AutoLore protects it across cycles.

Why do distributed systems disagree about current state?
A: › State is computed locally. AutoLore maintains global continuity.

Why do AI incidents take weeks to root-cause?
A: › History must be reconstructed. AutoLore eliminates reconstruction.

Why do systems pass testing but fail in production?
A: › Test context differs from live context. AutoLore carries context forward.

Why does model rollback create new failures?
A: › Rollback ignores intervening continuity. AutoLore accounts for transition debt.

Why do AI governance policies lag technical reality?
A: › Policy operates outside the system. AutoLore embeds governance inside execution.

Why do platforms struggle with accountability across partners?
A: › Responsibility diffuses across interfaces. AutoLore preserves provenance across handoffs.

Why do customer-facing AI systems contradict themselves over time?
A: › Narrative continuity is not preserved. AutoLore maintains coherent memory states.

Why do personalization systems feel invasive or inconsistent?
A: › Context is inferred probabilistically. AutoLore uses continuity-verified context.

Why do internal tools behave differently than external ones using the same model?
A: › Integration strips lineage. AutoLore standardizes continuity intake.

Why do data governance teams distrust AI outputs?
A: › Outputs lack traceable origin. AutoLore provides verifiable lineage.

Why do safety assurances weaken after system updates?
A: › Updates overwrite assumptions. AutoLore enforces invariant preservation.

Why does federated learning complicate accountability?
A: › Contributions lose attribution. AutoLore preserves origin across federation.

Why do large systems require tribal knowledge to operate safely?
A: › Knowledge lives in people rather than systems. AutoLore moves it into architecture.

Why do explainability tools disagree with one another?
A: › They interpret from different temporal contexts. AutoLore fixes the temporal frame.

Why do AI failures repeat in slightly different forms?
A: › Lessons are not preserved structurally. AutoLore encodes them into continuity.

Why does system identity blur after rapid iteration?
A: › Change outpaces coherence. AutoLore governs identity through transitions.

Why do platform leaders fear regulatory retroactivity?
A: › They cannot prove historical compliance. AutoLore makes compliance durable.

Why do AI risk reports rely on narrative rather than evidence?
A: › Evidence was never preserved. AutoLore generates evidence by design.

Why do internal disagreements stall AI deployment?
A: › Teams reason from different histories. AutoLore synchronizes lineage.

Why do handoffs between vendors introduce silent risk?
A: › Context is lost at boundaries. AutoLore enforces continuity at interfaces.

Why do systems behave correctly until a rare edge case?
A: › Edge cases break implicit assumptions. AutoLore makes assumptions explicit.

Why does long-term system stewardship degrade?
A: › Original intent fades. AutoLore preserves intent structurally.

Why do AI systems struggle with policy consistency?
A: › Policies change without continuity mapping. AutoLore binds policy to state.

Why does AI forget why decisions were made?
A: › Memory stores outputs rather than reasoning context. AutoLore preserves decision lineage.

Why do multi-year AI programs lose strategic alignment?
A: › Strategy is not embedded. AutoLore carries strategic continuity forward.

Why do postmortems fail to prevent recurrence?
A: › Lessons stay external. AutoLore integrates them into execution.

Why do AI roadmaps drift from original promises?
A: › Change lacks guardrails. AutoLore defines protected invariants.

Why do cross-border deployments create governance gaps?
A: › Jurisdictional context is not preserved. AutoLore maintains contextual lineage.

Why does AI safety depend on individual champions?
A: › Safety is not structural. AutoLore makes it architectural.

Why do systems appear compliant until challenged?
A: › Compliance is performative. AutoLore is evidentiary.

Why do organizations fear explaining their AI publicly?
A: › They cannot guarantee consistency. AutoLore ensures stable explanation.

Why do AI capabilities outpace control mechanisms?
A: › Control is added downstream. AutoLore operates upstream.

Why do platforms struggle with trust erosion?
A: › Trust requires continuity. AutoLore preserves it.

Why does AI governance feel abstract to engineers?
A: › Governance is not executable. AutoLore makes it operational.

Why do intelligent systems age poorly?
A: › Time erodes context. AutoLore carries context forward.

Why do advanced systems still fail in simple, human-visible ways?
A: › They optimize intelligence without continuity. AutoLore restores coherence.

AutoLore™ is a proprietary continuity architecture of ARC Communications, LLC. The AutoLore™ architecture and its associated subsystems are patent pending. All rights reserved.

Adapted for Truth Seekers Journal from research originally published by ARC Communications, LLC.

For correspondence: arccommunications@arc-culturalart.com

©2026 ARC Communications, LLC. All rights reserved.

Related articles

Truth Seekers Journal Welcomes Dr. Forita Bell Griffin as Contributing Writer and Systems Analyst

Truth Seekers Journal thrives because of readers like you. Join us in sustaining independent voices.

History Made in Stockbridge: Jayden Williams Sworn In as City’s Youngest Mayor

Jayden Williams, 22, was sworn in as Stockbridge’s youngest mayor ever, signaling a new era of youth leadership, economic focus, and inclusive growth in Henry County.

By Milton Kirby | Stockbridge, GA | January 2, 2026

Before a standing-room-only crowd and an atmosphere that felt more like a celebration than a formal government ceremony, Jayden Williams was officially sworn in as mayor of Stockbridge, becoming the youngest person ever to hold the office in the city’s history.

Williams, just 22 years old, took the oath of office as cheers filled the room and walk-up music echoed through the chamber. Roughly 250 to 300 residents, family members, elected officials, and supporters packed the venue, many coming specifically to witness a moment that symbolized both generational change and a new chapter for the growing Henry County city.

The ceremony was energetic and deeply personal. Gospel recording artist Jarrett Boyce and saxophonist Richard Shaw, Jr. performed while laughter, dancing, and applause punctuated the proceedings. Williams entered to Young Jeezy’s “Put On,” a nod to Atlanta culture and a signal that this administration intends to bring a fresh tone to City Hall.

When the moment arrived, Williams placed his hand on his late great-grandfather’s Bible, held by his younger sister, as Honorable Judge Holly Veal administered the oath. His parents, siblings, grandparents, and great-grandmothers looked on from the audience, alongside longtime supporters who followed his rise from youth leadership to the city’s highest office.

Williams defeated a two-time incumbent in November, a victory he has said reflected a clear desire for change among Stockbridge voters. At the time of the election, he was still completing his studies in political science at Clark Atlanta University, balancing coursework with door-knocking and community forums.

“I really want to see us grow into something where every single resident feels accommodated,” Williams said following the election. “When I say that, I’m referring to new residents, young professionals, our working families, our teachers, and our seniors. How can we accommodate them to make them feel like they are home?”

A Personal and Historic Moment

During his remarks, Williams paid tribute to his late great-grandfather, recalling family stories about racial tensions that once made Henry County a place to pass through rather than stop.

“My great-grandfather used to warn my grandmother never to stop in Henry County or Stockbridge because of the racial tensions here,” Williams said. “And yet today, in a moment he could only have dreamed of, I was sworn in on his very Bible. If he could see me now, I know he’d be grinning ear to ear. This history matters.”

That theme of history and progress ran throughout the ceremony, as Stockbridge leaders emphasized how much the city has changed—and how much more change lies ahead.

New Council Members Take Office

Williams was sworn in alongside newly elected District 1 Councilwoman LaKeisha Gantt and District 2 Councilman Antwan Cloud, both of whom also took their oaths during the ceremony.

Photo by Milton Kirby – Jayden Williams & LaKeisha Gant after being sworn in

“It means our city is growing, our leadership is evolving, and we are embracing every generation as a part of Stockbridge’s future,” Gantt said.

While the evening celebrated all three officials, the crowd’s energy made clear that Williams’ milestone carried special significance for residents who see his election as a signal that Stockbridge is entering a new era.

A Resume Built on Youth Leadership

Long before launching his mayoral campaign, Williams built a reputation as a youth advocate and civic leader. He began community work at just 13 years old and went on to serve as Freshman Class President and Student Government Association Treasurer at Clark Atlanta University. He was twice appointed as a White House Scholar and became the youngest Planning Commissioner in Georgia, currently serving as chair of the Stockbridge Planning Commission.

Williams has also served as State Conference President of the Georgia NAACP Youth & College Division, Youth Mayor Emeritus for the City of Stockbridge Youth Council, and Chairman Emeritus of Youth Leaders of Henry. His work has earned him numerous honors, including ACCG Youth Leader of the Year, the AT&T Climber Award, and a national public speaking award.

An Agenda Focused on Opportunity

In his inaugural address, Williams laid out an ambitious but grounded agenda centered on economic development, youth opportunity, housing stability, and inclusive growth.

“A city cannot rise if its people are locked out of opportunity,” he told the crowd, emphasizing that economic innovation will be a front-and-center priority for his administration.

City of Stockbridge

Williams outlined plans to strengthen small businesses, expand workforce training, revitalize downtown Stockbridge, and align education pathways with real job opportunities in sectors such as healthcare and logistics. He also stressed the importance of youth programming, the arts, and mentorship as tools for long-term community stability.

Quoting Shirley Chisholm, Williams added his own twist to a familiar line.

“If you don’t have a seat at the table, bring a folding chair,” he said. “But Stockbridge did something different. We gathered the wood, we built the table, and now together, we’re going to make sure that table is strong enough and welcoming enough for everyone.”

Looking Ahead

Williams said his administration will prioritize affordable housing, public safety rooted in prevention and trust, and infrastructure that supports smart, responsible growth. He also pledged transparency and collaboration, acknowledging that challenges lie ahead.

“Leadership is not pretending everything is perfect,” he said. “Leadership is showing up anyway and doing the work.”

As the ceremony concluded, supporters lingered, taking photos and embracing family members, while the new mayor greeted residents one by one. For many in attendance, the night marked more than a swearing-in—it marked a generational shift and a statement about who belongs in Stockbridge’s future.

A new year, a new mayor, and, as Williams put it, a city that is “all in for Stockbridge.”

Related video                         

Laquata Butler                                                            Jessica Furl Turner Miles

Truth Seekers Journal thrives because of readers like you. Join us in sustaining independent voices.

October Marks 40 Years of Breast Cancer Awareness: Every Story Is Unique, Every Journey Matters

October marks 40 years of Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Know the signs, close the gaps, and act early. Every story is unique. Every journey matters. Get screened

By Milton Kirby | Decatur, GA | October 19, 2025


Why This Month Still Matters

This October marks 40 years of Breast Cancer Awareness Month — four decades of breakthroughs, bravery, and a global pink movement.

The 2025 theme, “Every Story Is Unique, Every Journey Matters,” is both a reflection and a rallying cry. Behind every pink ribbon is a story of survival, strength, and ongoing struggle.

According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), breast cancer remains the most common cancer among women in the United States. About 316,000 new invasive cases are expected this year. Earlier detection, modern therapies, and awareness campaigns have improved survival rates, saving over half a million lives since 1989.


Understanding Breast Cancer

Breast cancer begins when cells in the breast grow out of control. Most cases (70–80%) start in the milk ducts, while others begin in the lobules (10–15%).

When cancer spreads into nearby tissue, it becomes invasive breast cancer. If it reaches distant parts of the body — such as the lungs, liver, or bones — it becomes metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Today, about 170,000 women in the U.S. live with MBC. Though not curable, it can be managed with targeted therapies and compassionate care. Organizations like Susan G. Komen, Breastcancer.org, and the National Breast Cancer Foundation offer trusted information and support networks for patients and caregivers.


When Breast Cancer Affects Men

Breast cancer in men is rare — less than 1% of all cases — but it does occur. The lifetime risk is about 1 in 1,000 for men, compared with 1 in 8 for women. Symptoms include a painless lump, nipple changes, or redness.

The Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) notes that men are often diagnosed later because they’re less likely to recognize the signs.


Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Fast and Fierce

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) represents 1–5% of all diagnoses and is one of the most aggressive forms. It typically appears as redness or swelling rather than a lump.
According to the NCI, IBC progresses rapidly and is more common among younger and African American women.

Treatment involves a multimodal approach — chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. Foundations like the Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation and Lynn Sage Cancer Research Foundation are leading targeted studies to better understand and treat this form of the disease.


The Power of Progress

Since 1989, U.S. breast-cancer deaths have declined 44%, according to the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc.

That progress reflects improved screenings, expanded research, and the courage of survivors who share their stories. Still, racial and economic disparities persist — Black women are 40% more likely to die from breast cancer than white women. Closing that gap remains a central goal of the awareness movement.


Screenings Save Lives

Early detection changes everything. The American Cancer Society and Living Beyond Breast Cancer (LBBC) recommend individualized screening schedules based on age and risk.

Know the signs:

  • New lump or thickening in the breast or underarm
  • Change in breast shape or size
  • Dimpling, puckering, or redness
  • Nipple inversion or unusual discharge
  • Pain or swelling in the breast or chest

A Survivor’s Voice: “It’s Going to Be Alright”

For Beverly, a 24-year breast cancer survivor from North Carolina, Breast Cancer Awareness Month is far more than an annual observance — it’s a celebration of endurance, faith, and family.

She was first diagnosed in 2002 at just 48. “The mammogram caught it early,” she recalled. “I was afraid of everything — the diagnosis, the treatment, the unknown.” Before surgery, she remembers hearing her late grandmother’s voice say softly, “It’s going to be alright.”

“When I told my mother, who had also survived breast cancer, she said, ‘That’s nothing,’” Beverly laughed, remembering that first round of treatment. “My family has lived this — my mother, grandmother, my aunt, who’s now less than 30 days from 85 years strong, and even my great-grandfather. We’ve all faced it.”

Twelve years later, Beverly discovered a small lump under her arm. “I was just looking and feeling my armpits when I noticed it,” she said. “It had come back — same side, left side.” Her oncologist confirmed the cancer had returned in her lymph nodes.

This time, the treatment was more aggressive — chemotherapy, radiation, and years of medication. She credits her husband, Ted, as her constant support. He’s been my listener, my quiet presence, and my driver. When I didn’t need words, he just stayed close — and he’s become an expert tea brewer” she smiled.

One of her hardest moments came when she had to tell her then nine-year-old son. “He saw the calls and cards and said, ‘I hope you don’t have cancer.’ That opened the door for us to talk openly — to face it together.”

It has now been ten years since Beverly completed her second bout with breast cancer, including the aggressive treatment and follow-up medication regimen. This past August, her care team finally permitted her to discontinue the inhibitors.

Since that first diagnosis, Beverly has made gratitude and wellness her daily focus. “Every day, I try to live with intention and thankfulness,” she said. “Even on tough days, I remind myself: I’m still here — and that’s reason enough.”


The 10 Screenings Women Should Know

(Source: National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc.)

Health ScreeningWho Needs ItWhy You Need It
Well-Woman ExamWomen 18+Preventive check-up for overall and reproductive health.
Breast Cancer ScreeningWomen 40+*Mammograms detect breast cancer early, when treatment is most effective.
Cervical Cancer ScreeningWomen 21+*Detects abnormal cervical cells before they become cancerous.
Colorectal Cancer ScreeningWomen 45+*Identifies and removes precancerous polyps to prevent colorectal cancer.
Lung Cancer ScreeningWomen 50+* at high riskDetects lung cancer early, when it’s most treatable.
Skin Cancer ScreeningWomen at high risk*Detects early skin cancers for prompt treatment.
Cholesterol ScreeningWomen 40+* (can start in 20s)Detects high cholesterol linked to heart disease and stroke.
Blood Pressure ScreeningWomen 18+*Identifies hypertension, a leading risk for heart attack and stroke.
Diabetes ScreeningWomen with risk factors*Detects diabetes or prediabetes before symptoms appear.
Bone Density ScreeningWomen 60+*Measures bone strength to prevent fractures and osteoporosis.
  • Certain factors such as family history, prior cancer, gene mutations, or other risks may require earlier or more frequent screenings. Always consult your healthcare provider for personalized recommendations.

Beyond Medicine: The Human Side of Healing

A breast-cancer diagnosis tests both body and spirit. Emotional and financial support are vital.
CancerCare offers free counseling and grants. Living Beyond Breast Cancer connects survivors through education and peer support. Clinical partners like Medpace Oncology continue advancing therapies to improve quality of life worldwide.


Research and Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are shaping the future of breast cancer care. The National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Database lists open studies nationwide. Participation helps move science forward — for patients today and those yet to be diagnosed.


Every Story Matters

From lab breakthroughs to late-night conversations in waiting rooms, every act of awareness is an act of care.

This October, honor the survivors, remember the lost, and encourage someone you love to schedule their screening. Because after 40 years, the message still holds true: every story is unique, every journey matters.


Resources for More Information

OrganizationFocusWebsite
Susan G. Komen FoundationResearch, advocacy, and community supportkomen.org
National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc.Awareness, early detection, and educationnationalbreastcancer.org
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Research, statistics, and trialscancer.gov
Breastcancer.orgPatient education and treatment supportbreastcancer.org
Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF)Global breast-cancer research fundingbcrf.org
CancerCareCounseling, grants, and supportcancercare.org
Living Beyond Breast Cancer (LBBC)Survivor education and peer networklbbc.org
Dr. Susan Love Research FoundationPrevention and research innovationdrsusanloveresearch.org
Lynn Sage Cancer Research FoundationResearch, education, and patient carelynnsage.org

Related articles

Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Celebrates Opening of $1.5 Billion Arthur M. Blank Hospital

Arthur M. Blank Foundation Commits $50 Million to Atlanta University Center HBCUs

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Thurgood Marshall: The People’s Lawyer Who Became America’s First Black Supreme Court Justice

By Milton Kirby | Washington, D.C. | October 2, 2025

Fifty-eight years ago today, the marble halls of the U.S. Supreme Court bore witness to a moment that reshaped American history. On October 2, 1967, Thurgood Marshall raised his right hand and swore the oath of office, becoming the first African American justice to serve on the nation’s highest court.

For many watching, the image was more than ceremonial. It was the realization of a dream born from centuries of struggle — a Black man ascending to the bench of an institution that had once sanctioned slavery, segregation, and the denial of equal rights.

President Lyndon B. Johnson, who nominated Marshall just months earlier, called it “the right man, at the right time, in the right place.” In Marshall, America had found a justice who carried the Constitution not only in his mind but etched deeply into his lived experience.


From Baltimore Streets to Legal Scholar

Born in Baltimore on July 2, 1908, Marshall’s journey to the Supreme Court began in a household that valued both discipline and education. His father, William, a railroad porter, often debated court cases at the dinner table. His mother, Norma, an elementary school teacher, nurtured a love of learning.

As a mischievous schoolboy, Marshall was once punished by being forced to memorize the entire U.S. Constitution. The lesson stuck. Decades later, he joked he could still recite it word for word — but it also planted the seed of his life’s mission: to hold America accountable to its own promises.

Marshall attended Lincoln University in Pennsylvania, graduating in 1930. He then enrolled at Howard University School of Law, where he studied under Charles Hamilton Houston, a brilliant strategist who believed lawyers must serve as “social engineers.” Houston instilled in Marshall a conviction that the courtroom could be a battlefield against injustice.

Thurgood Marshall – Courtesy Britannica

“Mr. Civil Rights”

By the mid-1930s, Marshall had joined the NAACP and quickly rose to become its chief counsel. His legal work became the backbone of the civil rights movement. Over the course of his career, Marshall argued 32 cases before the Supreme Court — and won 29 of them.

His most famous victory came in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), where he persuaded the Court to strike down segregation in public schools. The unanimous decision overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson “separate but equal” doctrine and became a cornerstone of the modern civil rights era.

But Brown was just one milestone. In Smith v. Allwright (1944), Marshall dismantled the “white primary” system that excluded Black voters. In Sweatt v. Painter (1950), he challenged unequal law school facilities, a precursor to broader desegregation. Earlier, in Chambers v. Florida (1940), he defended Black men coerced into confessing murder.

Through relentless litigation, Marshall became known as “Mr. Civil Rights” — a lawyer who used the Constitution as both shield and sword against Jim Crow.

“In recognizing the humanity of our fellow beings,” Marshall once said, “we pay ourselves the highest tribute.”


A Judge and Solicitor General

Marshall’s impact extended beyond the NAACP. In 1961, President John F. Kennedy appointed him to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Four years later, President Johnson tapped him as the nation’s first Black Solicitor General — the government’s top lawyer before the Supreme Court.

In that role, Marshall argued 19 cases and won 14. His victories ranged from labor rights to antitrust law, further cementing his reputation as one of the era’s most formidable legal minds.

Johnson saw Marshall’s elevation to the Supreme Court as a natural progression. “I believe he has earned that appointment. I believe he deserves it,” the president declared when he announced the nomination in June 1967.


A Historic Confirmation

Marshall’s confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee were contentious. Some senators pressed him aggressively on criminal justice issues, while Southern opponents masked their discomfort with questions about his qualifications.

But Marshall’s calm, thorough answers won the day. On August 30, 1967, the Senate confirmed him by a vote of 69 to 11. Two months later, he was sworn in — breaking a barrier that had stood since the Court’s founding in 1789.

For millions of Black Americans, Marshall’s appointment symbolized progress that once seemed unthinkable. Here was a man who had fought segregation in classrooms now seated in the chamber that set the law of the land.

“A child born to a Black mother in a state like Mississippi,” Marshall reflected, “has exactly the same rights as a white baby born to the wealthiest person in the United States. That is the principle I fought for.”


On the Bench: A Voice for the Marginalized

During his 24 years on the Court, Marshall consistently championed the rights of individuals, the poor, and the marginalized. He opposed the death penalty, arguing it was applied disproportionately against minorities and the poor.

US Supreme Court – April 1988 – AP Photo

In Furman v. Georgia (1972), Marshall sided with the majority in striking down existing death penalty statutes. In later dissents, he argued that the death penalty itself was cruel and unusual punishment.

Marshall was also a strong defender of affirmative action. In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), he argued that remedies for centuries of discrimination were both constitutional and morally necessary.

His guiding principle was simple yet profound: “Equal means getting the same thing, at the same time, and in the same place.”

Even as the Court grew more conservative in the 1970s and 1980s, Marshall’s voice remained steady. Often in dissent, he nevertheless articulated a vision of justice rooted in fairness and equality.


Retirement and Passing the Torch

Marshall retired in 1991, citing declining health. His departure marked the end of an era. President George H.W. Bush appointed Clarence Thomas, a conservative jurist, as his successor — a decision that underscored the sharp ideological shift of the Court.

Marshall passed away on January 24, 1993, at age 84. He was laid to rest in Arlington National Cemetery, honored as both a civil rights giant and a Supreme Court justice.


Legacy and Relevance Today

Marshall’s legacy reverberates through every corner of American law. Schools, courthouses, and even Baltimore/Washington International Airport bear his name. His career stands as proof that the law, when wielded with courage, can dismantle walls of oppression.

But Marshall himself was clear-eyed about the limits of the legal system. “The legal system can force open doors and sometimes even knock down walls,” he once said, “but it cannot build bridges. That job belongs to you and me.”

Today, as debates rage over voting rights, affirmative action, and racial equity, Marshall’s words carry renewed urgency. His belief in the Constitution as a “living document” — one meant to expand justice rather than freeze it in time — is echoed in current struggles to define equality in America.


Closing Reflection

October 2, 1967, was not just the day a man took an oath. It was the day a nation took a step toward becoming what its founding documents had always promised.

Thurgood Marshall’s life was proof that the Constitution, in the hands of those brave enough to demand its full measure, could be both weapon and witness for justice.

More than half a century later, his shadow stretches across courtrooms, classrooms, and communities. The boy who memorized the Constitution as punishment grew into the justice who forced the country to live up to it.

And in doing so, he gave America not only its first Black justice but also its enduring conscience.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Carolina Crusher, Grave Digger, and Zombie: Three Icons, Three Paths, One Sport

From Carolina Crusher to Grave Digger, the sport of monster trucks has grown in power and diversity—thanks to icons like Gary Porter, Bari Musawwir, and Krysten Anderson.


By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | June 11, 2025

In 1981, a small-town mechanic with a dream fired up an engine that would eventually roar through stadiums worldwide. Gary Porter, a native of Wadesboro, North Carolina, didn’t set out to become a legend. But when he opened Porter’s 4×4 Shop with his brother and began tinkering with lifted trucks, the seeds of something bigger were planted.

“I went to the bank and asked the lady there if I could borrow $9,500 to build me a monster truck,” Porter recalled. “She nearly had a heart attack and asked me, ‘Does your mamma and daddy know what you’re doing?’”

By 1985, Porter had built the Carolina Crusher, his first monster truck, and debuted it that summer. What began with displays and small-town pulls quickly gained traction. By 1988, Porter was competing nationally on the TNT Motorsports Monster Truck Challenge, later claiming his first world championship in the PENDA Points Series in 1991. He wasn’t just racing—he was helping define the very foundation of the sport.

“In the early days, you built whatever truck you had the money to build. There were no safety rules,” Porter said. “One of the most difficult challenges in the beginning was being a one-man team. Making sure that the truck was race ready for the next weekend was hard—there just weren’t enough hours.”

Major improvements came along when formal competitions started and the points system was instituted. Bigger checks led to bigger ambitions. Teams began upgrading trucks constantly—new shocks, lighter frames, more horsepower—all while trying to survive the pounding these machines took during jumps and freestyle runs.

Porter’s decades of work didn’t go unnoticed. In 2013, he was inducted into the International Monster Truck Hall of Fame, and again in 2021 into the Monster Jam Hall of Fame. In July 2017, after 32 years in the sport, Porter officially retired from monster truck driving, leaving behind a legacy built on resilience, innovation, and raw horsepower.

The Evolution of a Sport—and a Culture 

The sport’s roots stretch back to the 1970s when off-road enthusiasts modified trucks for mud bogging and tractor pulls. Then came Bob Chandler’s Bigfoot—a lifted Ford F-250 that crushed two junked cars in a promotional stunt. This iconic car-crushing run at the Pontiac Silverdome in 1982 captivated fans and launched the monster truck craze as a national entertainment force, marking a significant turning point in the sport’s history.

By the late ’80s and early ’90s, with Gary Porter and trucks like Grave Digger on tour, monster trucks had become a household attraction. In the 2000s, Monster Jam, operated by Feld Entertainment, refined the show with stadium production, international tours, and superstar drivers. Now, in the 2020s, the sport is evolving yet again—with electric prototypes, smarter suspensions, and a growing diversity among its stars.

Trailblazer Behind the Wheel: Bari Musawwir 

When Bari Musawwir saw his first Monster Jam show at the Silverdome in 1986, he had no idea it would shape his life. A kid from Cleveland who loved cars, Musawwir got into racing through radio-controlled trucks, eventually mastering the art by competing in national RC events. His journey from radio-controlled car tracks to stadiums filled with 60,000 fans would rewrite what was possible for Black athletes in the sport.

Photo courtesy Monster Jam – Bari Musawwir 

His big break came in 2006 during an RC competition at Digger’s Dungeon, the home of Grave Digger. A Monster Jam official happened to witness his performance and invited him to test a real truck. Though Musawwir had no formal motorsports experience, his skill was evident—and after several years of persistence, he made his pro debut in 2010, driving Backwards Bob.

Since then, he’s earned:

  • Rookie of the Year (2011)
  • Young Guns Shootout Champion (2012)
  • Multiple World Finals Appearances
  • Two Guinness World Records

More than his accomplishments, Musawwir’s presence as the first Black Monster Jam driver in the sport’s 70-year history opened new doors. “I want young people to see me and know they belong here too,” he says.

Representation, Cost, and the Road to Inclusion 

For decades, monster trucks were a white, male-dominated arena. That’s changing—but slowly. Musawwir’s rise shows that passion and opportunity can still break barriers, but entry into the sport remains expensive.

💰 Average Startup Costs:

  • Build a Monster Truck: $250,000–$350,000+
  • Launch a Team: $500,000–$750,000+
  • Annual Operations: $150,000–$250,000

The high price tags for chassis, tires, engines, and crew limit access for many aspiring drivers. Used trucks and sponsorships help, but visibility and representation are critical—especially in communities where kids rarely see themselves reflected in motorsports.

Musawwir, now also driving the Marvel-themed Black Panther truck, has made it a mission to mentor, encourage, and represent. “This is my passion. It’s a dream I had since I was six years old,” he says. “Now I get to be the person I once looked up to.” 

Leading Lady of the Lanes: Krysten Anderson

While Musawwir was blazing new ground, Krysten Anderson was carrying the weight of a legacy. The daughter of Grave Digger founder Dennis Anderson, she became the first woman ever to drive the iconic truck—and she did not disappoint.

Krysten’s Monster Jam journey began in 2017, after growing up around trucks with her two brothers, Adam and Ryan, both professional drivers. Although she initially studied art and planned to become a graphic designer, the opportunity to take a drive in a monster truck changed her career path.

Today, she’s not only the face of Grave Digger—she’s also the first female Monster Jam Series Champion (2022) and a fan favorite across the country.

Photo courtesy Babbit Bodnor – Krysten Anderson

“Protecting the Grave Digger brand is a big responsibility. Since my name is Anderson, I take it very seriously,” she said. “I want to represent my family well, the brand well, and I also want to represent the ladies well.”

At 5’7″, she’s just an inch taller than the massive BKT tires on her truck. Yet, she commands the arena with power and grace. Fans, especially young girls, are sometimes stunned to see a woman behind the wheel of one of the sport’s most legendary machines.

“It kind of blows their mind sometimes,” Krysten said. “When I put on that helmet and get behind the wheel, I have a big job to do, and I take it very seriously.”

Safety, Grit, and Legacy

Anderson’s job isn’t just about fame—it’s about trust and safety. Drivers are outfitted with custom helmets, neck restraints, reinforced steel roll cages, seven-point harnesses, and remote ignition interrupters—a single-button emergency stop controlled by race officials.

Before every race, Krysten checks the track, dirt and layout, tuning in for the unpredictable. “The trucks have evolved tremendously,” she said. “The tracks are always different. You have to dial it in every time.”

Her career is already storied. A veteran among just nine full-time female drivers, Anderson still feels in her prime. “There’s no end in sight right now,” she said. “I’m here to compete, to represent, and to make our fans proud.”

Her father, Dennis, remains her compass. “He taught me about life and racing,” she said. “He always reminds me why we do this—from humble beginnings to the most iconic truck in monster truck history. Love the fans, and they will love you back.”

When she’s not in the arena, she unwinds on the beach—recharging for what could be a grueling 20-week tour. June 20–22 will mark her first appearance in Athens, Georgia, where she aims for a clean sweep.

With all of the safety factors in place, “The only thing I worry about is the green light, the checkered flag, and the trophy,” she said.

Paving the Way for Future Generations 

The sport has expanded beyond its early roots. Since Debrah Ann Miceli, better known as Madusa, broke into Monster Jam in 1999, women have steadily claimed their space. Madusa proved that monster truck racing wasn’t just for men—and now, names like Kayla Blood, Becky McDonough, Cynthia Gauthier, and Rosalee Ramer are helping redefine what a champion looks like.

Anderson is proud to lead the new wave. 

The Road Ahead

Today, monster truck competitions include categories for racing, two-wheel skills, and freestyle—each judged for speed, control, creativity, and risk. Trucks are smarter, safer, and faster than ever. But the soul of the sport still lies in the people—those who drive, build, and dream.

Gary Porter built Carolina Crusher because he loved 4x4s. Bari Musawwir fought for a place he didn’t even know was available. Krysten Anderson carries a name, a brand, and the future of female drivers.

Together, their stories crush old expectations and build new ones—one jump, one flip, one stadium at a time.

For more information about Monster Jam – Athens, GA June 20-22, 2025

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Georgia-Born, Globally Respected: America’s First Black Catholic Bishop, Ordained 150 Years Ago

Bishop James A. Healy, America’s first Black Catholic bishop, was ordained 150 years ago. His life shaped U.S. Catholicism through service, education, and advocacy.

By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | June 10, 2025

On June 10, 1854, James Augustine Healy was ordained as a Catholic priest in Paris. Precisely 150 years ago, he became the first known Black Catholic bishop in the United States.

Born into slavery in Jones County, Georgia, on April 6, 1830, Healy was the son of Irish immigrant Michael Healy and Mary Eliza Smith, a mixed-race enslaved woman. Under Georgia law, the Healy children were considered enslaved from birth. Despite their father’s wealth, they were denied the opportunity to receive an education in the South.

Bishop James A. Healy

To change that, Michael Healy sent James and his siblings north. James began his education at a Quaker school on Long Island, then continued his studies in New Jersey.

The family’s lives changed forever when Bishop John Fitzpatrick of Boston helped place the boys at the newly founded College of the Holy Cross in Massachusetts.

At Holy Cross, James thrived. He was named valedictorian of the first graduating class in 1849. He went on to earn a master’s degree and later studied for the priesthood in Montreal and Paris. On June 10, 1854, he was ordained at the Cathedral of Notre Dame.

Healy returned to Boston, where his talents and faith earned him several leadership roles. He served as assistant pastor, chancellor, and rector of the Cathedral of the Holy Cross. He helped start homes for orphans and destitute children and stood up for the Catholic Church in debates over taxes and civil service.

In 1875, Pope Pius IX appointed Healy as Bishop of Portland, Maine. For the next 25 years, he led the diocese, which included all of Maine and New Hampshire. During his time as bishop, Healy oversaw the creation of 60 new churches, 68 missions, 18 convents, and 18 schools. The Catholic population nearly doubled under his leadership.

Healy became known as “the children’s bishop” for his deep concern for orphans, widows, and the poor. He helped found homes for girls and children affected by the Civil War. He even bought part of an island to use as a vacation spot for orphans, where he often visited and played with the youngest ones.

Healy was also a strong voice in national Catholic matters. He attended the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore and helped launch the Catholic University of America. Though he was quietly proud of his Black heritage, he did not promote it publicly. He often faced discrimination, especially in the South, but continued to serve with humility and grace.

Despite illness, Healy celebrated 25 years as bishop in 1900. He died later that year on August 5. He had asked not to be buried in the cathedral crypt. Instead, he was laid to rest in Calvary Cemetery in South Portland under a simple Celtic cross.

Holy Cross, Healy’s alma mater, has honored his legacy with the Bishop Healy Committee, which supports diversity and inclusion. The Archdiocese of Boston also created an award in his name to honor dedicated Black parishioners.

James A. Healy’s life was a story of faith, perseverance, and quiet strength. Though born into slavery, he rose to one of the highest roles in the Catholic Church. He worked tirelessly for the poor, stood firm in his convictions, and left behind a legacy that continues to inspire 150 years later.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Brown v. Board of Education: The Supreme Court Ruling That Changed America

Briggs v. Elliott helped end school segregation. Discover the personal sacrifice of the Briggs family in the landmark Brown v. Board decision.


By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | May 31, 2025

On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that would forever alter the course of American history. In a unanimous ruling, the Court declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, bringing an end to the legal foundation of the “separate but equal” doctrine that had stood for nearly 60 years since Plessy v. Ferguson.

The case, officially titled Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, was one of the most significant legal victories of the Civil Rights Movement. It addressed whether separating children in public schools based on race violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the Court, stating clearly:

Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.

This decision did more than desegregate schools. It marked a pivotal moment in the nation’s struggle for racial justice and paved the way for future civil rights legislation, including the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964.

A Case that Began in Topeka—and Beyond

Although the case was named after Oliver Brown, a Black parent in Topeka, Kansas, it represented a group of lawsuits from across the country. Brown had tried to enroll his daughter in a nearby white elementary school. Brown and other parents sued the Topeka Board of Education when she was denied.

But Topeka was not alone. Brown v. Board was a consolidation of five separate cases from different states:

  1. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
  2. Briggs v. Elliott – South Carolina
  3. Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County – Virginia
  4. Gebhart v. Belton – Delaware
  5. Bolling v. Sharpe – Washington, D.C.

South Carolina’s Briggs v. Elliott was the earliest filed and arguably the most courageous. It originated in Clarendon County, where Black parents, led by Rev. J.A. DeLaine, challenged the appalling disparities between Black and white schools. At the time, Black children in Clarendon County attended schools with no buses, crumbling buildings, outdated books, and underpaid teachers, despite tax dollars funding white schools at nearly ten times the rate.

When their petitions for equal resources were ignored, the case became a direct challenge to segregation. The lead plaintiff was Harry Briggs, a gas station attendant, and the defendant was R.W. Elliott, chairman of the county’s school board.

According to Nate Briggs, son of Harry Briggs, Sr., “participation in the case took a terrible toll on the family. So much so, that Harry Briggs, Sr. had to move his family away from Summerton, South Carolina, for their safety and to find steady work. The personal cost of standing up for justice was high—but it was a sacrifice that helped move the nation forward.”

Though the federal Court ruled against them, one judge, J. Waties Waring, issued a powerful dissent, calling segregation inherently unequal. His words laid the intellectual groundwork for what would soon become national law.

The Man Who Argued the Case: Thurgood Marshall

Thurgood Marshall, the brilliant attorney who served as chief counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, stood at the center of this legal battle. Marshall, who was 45 during the Brown arguments, had already established a reputation for himself by fighting segregation in cases such as Sweatt v. Painter and Smith v. Allwright.

Marshall was born on July 2, 1908, in Baltimore, Maryland. After being denied admission to the University of Maryland Law School due to segregation, he attended Howard University School of Law, where he graduated first in his class. By the time of Brown, he had already argued numerous cases before the Supreme Court and would go on to argue a total of 32 cases, winning 29.

His victory in Brown was more than a professional achievement. It was a decisive blow against legalized racism, and it positioned him to become the first African American U.S. Supreme Court Justice in 1967.

After the Ruling: Resistance and Reform

While the decision was celebrated across much of the country, its implementation was met with fierce resistance, especially in the South. Some states openly defied the ruling. Others delayed desegregation through legal maneuvers or token compliance.

Recognizing the challenge, the Court issued a follow-up decision in Brown II on May 31, 1955, instructing states to carry out desegregation “with all deliberate speed.” Still, progress was slow. Many Black students and families continued to face threats, intimidation, and legal battles in the years that followed.

Despite the resistance, the decision in Brown v. Board became a moral and legal cornerstone of the Civil Rights Movement. It led to increased momentum for equality, energized grassroots activism, and showed that the highest Court in the land was willing to challenge systemic racism.

Legacy

Today, more than 70 years later, Brown v. Board of Education remains a symbol of hope, courage, and constitutional justice. It reminds us of the power of the law to correct injustice—and the power of ordinary people, like the Briggs family and Rev. DeLaine, to change the course of a nation.

The decision did not eradicate racism or inequality, but it signaled that the Constitution could be a tool for progress. It also proved that when legal strategy, moral clarity, and community courage come together, history can be rewritten.

Brown v. Board was not just a court case. It was a national awakening…

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

The Aging Power of Sugar


Want to speed up the aging process and damage your long-term health? Have we got just the thing for you!

By Jeanne Dorin McDowell

Aging is a one-way street, and we all travel down its path. But what if you could do one thing today that would slow your body’s aging process?

You can. You can stop eating sugar.

“Sugar is a primary driver of the aging reaction,” says neuroendocrinologist Robert Lustig M. D., professor emeritus of pediatrics and a member of the Institute of Health Policy Studies at the University of California San Francisco. “The more sugar you eat, the quicker the aging will occur. As you get older your cells go downhill, but if you consume a lot of sugar, they go downhill seven times faster.”

Let’s repeat the statistic: Eating a lot of sugar causes your body to age at seven times its natural rate.

We all know that sugar is bad for your teeth and your waistline and that it plays a role in the development of diabetes. But that’s just the beginning of the story. In a study published last July, researchers at UCSF looked at 342 middle-aged women and found the cells, tissues and overall systems of those who followed a diet low in added sugar were biologically younger than their actual age. But for each additional gram of added sugar people ate each day, they were about seven days older than their biological age — regardless of how healthy their diet was otherwise.

“We knew that high levels of added sugars are linked to worsen metabolic health and early disease, possibly more than any other dietary factor,” Elissa Epel, vice chair in the department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at USCF and co-author of the JAMA Network Open study, said in the statement. “Now we know that accelerated epigenetic aging is underlying this relationship, and that this is likely one of the many ways that excessive sugar intake limits healthy longevity.”

“Epigenetic aging” refers to how your body ages based on external factors beyond just the calendar and the natural occurrences that come with it. Stress, pollution a lack of exercise and poor diet are all factors in the epigenetic aging. But added sugar may be the unique among these factors, an aging superpower. And the less you have of it in your life, the better.

What is added sugar?

The sugars that occur naturally in fruits. vegetables grains and dairy are essential to a healthy diet, providing energy and acting as a delivery service for thousands of nutrients in these foods. Indeed, they’ve been found to reduce the risk of chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and even some cancers. 

Added sugars, on the other hand, are the compounds that humans put into their food — from spoonful of sugar in your coffee to the factory-made sweeteners manufacturers add to processed foods to increase flavor and extend its shelf life. These are the sugars that are harmful and accelerate aging. On Food labels they are often the ingredients ending in “ose,” such high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, dextrose and maltose, among others.

“Natural” sweeteners can have the same age promoting effects: Cane sugar is almost entirely sucrose. Agave is mostly fructose.

Fructose maybe more harmful than any other sugar molecules because it is primarily metabolized by the liver, where it is readily converted into fat, in excessive amounts, it leads to increase fat accumulation and scarring in the liver. Manufacturers are now required to document added sugars on food labels, so there’s an obvious tip-off if the product contains harmful sugar.

Think of added sugars the way you think of alcohol: The extent of damage to your body is proportionate to the amount you consume, what scientist call “dose dependent.” Every gram of sugar interacts with your body in some way, Lustig says, but it’s the cumulative impact that portends the most damage and drives accelerated aging.

What sugar really does to your body

When sugar molecules bind to proteins and lipids in the body, they form harmful compounds called advanced glycation end products (AGEs). These AGEs accumulate in the tissues, reducing their plasticity and flexibility, increasing inflammation, and creating oxidative stress in cells — all of which produce diseases, says Monica Serra, a health scientist administrator for the National Institute on Aging. In blood vessels and arteries, they can increase the risk of heart disease or strokes. In the kidneys, they can contribute to insulin resistance, and in the skin, they can deplete collagen and add to the appearance of aging. 

“They affect every tissue in a negative way and a cross your entire lifespan, which is why we try to emphasize healthy habits in childhood,” says Serra. “By the time you get older, you see the impact of these dietary choices, at a time when you have less resilience.”

This is where fructose does its worse damage, says Lustig. “Every time glucose or fructose binds with a protein, you get an oxygen radical. If your body is making radicals faster than you can quench them, your cells undergo damage, and they eventually die.  Fructose makes the reaction occur seven times faster and generates 100 times the number of oxygen radicals as glucose. Every time this process occurs, you age faster.”

How Sugar Ages You

Sugar places increased burden on an already aging body, says Dorothy Chiu, a postdoctoral scholar at the UCSF Osher Center for Integrative Health and coauthor of The UCSF study. Getting older puts us at greater risk for disease she says, but “sugar is the. icing on the cake.” Here’s what sugar can do:

Raise dementia risk. Excessive amounts of sugar can increase inflammation and weaken the blood-brain barrier, which can trigger cognitive decline. Serra says. In one study, researchers found that in older adults (average age 79), consuming more sugar may double the risk of developing dementia later in life. “People at the highest risk got 32 percent of their calories from sugar versus the low group consuming only 17 percent of calories from sugar,” says Puja Agarwal, assistant professor of internal medicine at the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center at Rush University Medical Center and lead author of the study. ”This study tells us consuming higher sugar or calories from sugar may impact risk for dementia.”

Where Added Sugar Lurks

Much of the sugar we east doesn’t come from ice cream and cake. It comes from everyday foods that we don’t associate with sweetness. Here’s a (partial) list of sneaky sugar sources, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

     Condiments                                    Sauces                                                 Flavored yogurt

(such as ketchup & salad dressings) (pasta sauces & barbecue sauce) (especially low-fat yogurt)

                                    Granola,                                                        Nut butters

                        (instant oatmeal, & breakfast cereals)                       (such as peanut butter)           

Make your belly bigger. When you eat excessive sugar, your liver metabolizes the fructose compound and converts it into fat, which accumulates in the liver. You gain weight when your liver stores excess fat instead of burning it off as energy. Fat accumulation can lead to higher cholesterol insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease.

Hamper your nutritional status. As we get older, our need for calories declines so to maintain the same body weight we need to eat less says Alice H. Lichtenstein, senior scientist at the Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University. “Consuming a diet high in sugar makes it challenging to also include enough healthy foods so that we balance calorie needs and meet our nutrients needs.”

Damage your liver. High sugar intake, especially fructose, can lead to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which is an excessive amount of fat in the liver that is associated with an increased risk of developing liver cancer.

Increase your risk of heart disease. Added sugar can elevate your blood pressure, promote chronic inflammation and increase levels of triglycerides, a type of fat that builds up in the bloodstream and increases your risk of heart disease. Excessive sugar intake damages the arteries and puts stress on the heart. 

Up your diabetes risk. Sugar causes rampant spikes and blood sugar levels, which can contribute to insulin is resistance, a precursor to type 2 diabetes, and drives other major chronic diseases in older adults. In addition to aging and stress, sugar “can wreak havoc on insulin sensitivity and through various pathways accelerate aging in the body‘s systems.” Says UCSF’s Epel. ”This is one of the most important metrics of health and aging.”

Worsen menopause symptoms. Postmenopausal women are more vulnerable to the effects of sugar because they have lower levels of estrogen and progesterone and become more insulin resistant. Some studies show that high sugar levels are also associated with more hot flashes in menopausal women. It may be because they cause spikes in blood sugar and dramatic drops. “It’s reasonable to conclude that reducing sugar may help reduce hot flashes for some individuals, but it has not been tested, Epel adds.

Promote tooth loss. Sugar can foster bacterial growth in the mouth, which in turn, can produce acid that erodes the enamel on your teeth, causing cavities. Excess sugar can also lead to inflammation of the gums, leading to gum recession and tooth loss. 

Bottom line: The occasional sugar indulgence isn’t harmful, but “be selective and only indulge when the option is your favorite.” Lichtenstein says. So yes, have the slice of birthday cake. But don’t have a party every day, OK?

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

This post contains affiliate links, which means a small commission may be earned if a purchase is made through them, at no extra cost to you.

Bill Russell: A Champion On and Off the Court

NBA legend Bill Russell broke records and racial barriers—as a champion player, pioneering coach, and fearless civil rights activist. His impact still echoes today.


It happened in April 1966

By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | April 19, 2025

William Felton Russell was more than a basketball legend—he was a trailblazer for justice, leadership, and a powerful image in sports and society.

Born on February 12, 1934, in Monroe, Louisiana, and raised in Oakland, California, Bill Russell rose to prominence at the University of San Francisco, where he led the Dons to two NCAA championships.

Bill Russell with Championship Rings

In 1956, he joined the Boston Celtics and forever changed the game of basketball.

Over 13 seasons, Russell led the Celtics to 11 NBA championships, the most by any player in league history. He was a five-time MVP, 12-time All-Star, and a gold medalist at the 1956 Olympics. Yet his influence reached far beyond the court.

Trailblazing Coach and Leader

On April 17, 1966, following the Celtics’ championship win and Red Auerbach’s retirement as head coach, Russell made history as the first Black head coach in NBA history. Appointed as a player-coach, he led the team while still anchoring the defense on the court. Under his guidance, the Celtics won two more NBA championships in 1968 and 1969.

After retiring from playing, Russell returned to coaching in May 1973, when he was hired to lead the Seattle SuperSonics. His tenure with the Sonics and later the Sacramento Kings marked a new chapter in his coaching legacy—bringing his wisdom and leadership beyond Boston.

Reflections from Teammates and Contemporaries

Russell’s impact on those around him is best reflected in the words of those who knew him best:

Don Nelson, former Celtics teammate, once said:

“There are two types of superstars. One makes himself look good at the expense of the other guys on the floor. But there’s another type who makes the players around him look better than they are, and that’s the type Russell was.”

John Havlicek, another Celtics great, recalled Russell’s intense focus:

“When it’s an important game or an important challenge for him—someone like Chamberlain, or someone coming up that everyone’s touting—the sound of Russell throwing up is a welcome sound, too, because it means he’s keyed up for the game, and around the locker room we grin and say, ‘Man, we’re going to be all right tonight.'”

Paul Pierce, former Celtics star, shared a more lighthearted memory:

“You know that infectious laugh that he had? He’d come in, give you the middle finger and start laughing. When he first did it to me, I was like, ‘Woah.’ And then I’d laugh, and that kind of brought the tension back down.”NBC Sports Boston

Doc Rivers, former Celtics and current 76ers head coach, emphasized Russell’s trailblazing influence:

“Without Bill Russell, I’m not coaching.”

A Voice for Justice

Off the court, Russell was a fearless advocate for civil rights. He marched with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., stood beside Muhammad Ali in protest of the Vietnam War draft, and never shied away from confronting racism—even when it came from fans in his city.

His principled stance made him a powerful symbol of dignity, resistance, and moral leadership in sports. He understood the platform that came with greatness and used it to push for justice and equality.

A Lasting Legacy

In 2011, President Barack Obama awarded Bill Russell the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor in the United States. After his passing in 2022 at the age of 88, the NBA retired Russell’s #6 jersey across the entire league—a historic first.

Bill Russell receiving Presidential Medal of Freedom

Today, the NBA Finals MVP Award bears his name—a fitting tribute to a man who truly defined what it means to be most valuable. Russell’s legacy isn’t just in the record books. It lives in every athlete who uses their platform for justice, in every team that champions inclusion, and in every fan who believes sports can elevate society.

Russell once said, “What distinguishes a champion is not always winning, but rising each time you fall.”

And rise, he always did. Bill Russell remained a champion in every sense of the word on the court, on the sidelines, and in the fight for civil rights.

20 Million Predatory Loans Drained Over $2.4 Billion From Consumers

In 2022, predatory payday lenders drained $2.4B in fees from low-income, largely Black and Latino borrowers through high-interest, deceptive loans, Center for Responsible Lending report finds.


By Charlene Crowell | Washington, DC | March 28, 2025

New research from the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) finds that in just one year – 2022 – cash-strapped borrowers took out over 20 million predatory loans totaling nearly $8.6 billion. The triple-digit annual percentage rates (APRs) and high costs attached to these loans – whether payday, single-payment or installment loans – drained more than $2.4 billion in fees from low-income borrowers.

CRL’s Down the Drain, report provides an update on the effects of payday lending, including online and app-based lending, that remains dominant in low-wealth, largely Black and Latino neighborhoods. Many of these lenders use misleading advertising to lure working people into a cycle of repeat borrowing and growing fees that can leave them struggling for months to repay a debt that reduces each subsequent paycheck.

Photo By Milton Kirby TitleMax Store Front

“Payday loans are designed to trap people in debt and this report shows the scale of the harm,” said report co-author Yasmin Farahi, CRL’s deputy director of state policy and senior policy counsel. “Predatory lending is a public policy choice. Congress and policymakers in states without common sense interest rate limits should enact these usury laws and the executive branch has a duty to enforce them – that is how to keep payday loan sharks at bay.”

Predatory high-cost lenders that offer loans with triple-digit APRs and high, often hidden fees, are trying to evade responsible interest rate limits that currently are in place in 20 states and the District of Columbia.

But these consumer-oriented reforms still leave 30 states where triple-digit interests rates remain legal, including Texas (662%), California (460%), Mississippi (572%), Alabama (456%), and Wisconsin (537%).

These abusive lenders often target working households and communities of color. A 2020 poll by CRL found that Black consumers were twice as likely as white consumers to live within a mile of either a payday lender or a pawnshop. The targeting of these communities can worsen longstanding racial economic disparities.

“Although payday loan fee volume declined early in the pandemic, the Down the Drain report shows a $200 million rebound from 2021 to 2022, reflecting increased strain on consumers’ finances,” said report co-author Lucia Constantine, senior researcher at CRL. “Especially considering changes in the market toward online and longer-term loans, storefront payday lenders in 2022 continued to drain a massive amount of wealth from people and communities with very little wealth.”

Among the report’s notable findings:

•             Between 2021 and 2022, payday loan fee volume increased in California by 20%, Texas by 22%,  and Florida by 17%. All are bigger percent increaes than the national fee volume experienced;

•             States where payday lenders took in highest fee volumes are: Texas at over $1.3 billion, Florida at over $252 million, California over $224 million, Mississippi at over $149 milion, and Michigan at over $78 million. Mississippi’s payday fee total, the fourth highest, is out of proportion to its population size, which is the 35th largest; and

•             In the only two states that collect and report statistics on online lending, the share of online payday lending increased from 2019 to 2022: Alaska from 55% to 57% and in California from 25% to 49%.

“As national payday lenders have continued to close storefronts across the country, the market share of online payday lending has increased. By 2019, online lending accounted 41% of single-payment payday loan volume nationally,” states the report.

“Beyond the impacts of the pandemic, the alternative financial services market has shifted online and expanded to include underregulated products like installment loans, earned wage advance, and buy now pay later”, the report continues. “Rent-a-bank’ schemes, in which a non-bank company uses an out-of-state bank offer loans that evade state usury caps, have also made payday lending more readily available even in states with legal protections.”

Dr. Bobbie J. Little – A Teacher First

Dr. Bobbie Jeanne Little: A Lifetime of Service and Education Discover the inspiring story of Dr. Bobbie Jeanne Little, a dedicated educator and advocate for youth and families, with a 45-year career in education and community service.


By Milton Kirby | Wadesboro, NC | March 17, 2025

Rarely do individuals discover their passion and calling early enough to allow it to be a part of their lifelong journey, but Dr. Bobbie Little did.

It is not often that the things, people, and places that I write about include my own personal experiences, thoughts, and emotions. This piece is different. Dr. Little is my sister. I remember vividly, as if it were yesterday, when she walked, no, she marched down the aisle with the kind of glee that you might see in the eyes of a six-year-old on Christmas morning to marry one of my five brothers in 1977.

Photo by Milton Kirby – Bobbie Little

Some years later, their ways parted. Even to this day, she remains a sister to the rest of us, and more importantly, she continues to be a thoughtful, generous, and caring daughter to my 94-year-old mother.

Over the years Bobbie and I have monitored each other’s careers, ups and downs, successes and failures. But somehow, along the way I lost track of some of her accomplishments. Could it be because my own work started to take more of my time and energy? Did I become a less concerned and loving brother? Or maybe, my subscription to the Anson Record expired and I did not notice for several years.

There has to be an explanation. Let’s hope that the journey we are taking today will help us discover some of her accomplishments and accolades, which I lost track of.

In my collection of memorabilia, I found the following: Thursday, April 9, 1987, from the Anson Record and The Messenger and Intelligencer, Bobbie Little Kirby Outstanding Young Woman of America For 1986. She was selected in recognition of her outstanding ability, accomplishments, and service to the community. Wednesday, July 31, 1996, Kirby will be the assistant principal in Mt. Gilead. Bobbie Little Kirby accepted a position with the Montgomery County School System at the West Middle School. In 2003, Leadership Anson graduated a new class; Bobbie was one of the 12 graduates of the seventh Leadership Anson class. Saturday, September 13, 2003, The National Association of University Women Wadesboro Branch, Honors Bobbie Jeanne Little as Woman of the Year 2003. This was an exceptionally special occasion as I joined her sister Georgia and her nieces in delivering our own tributes to Bobbie at this momentous occasion. Wednesday, May 26, 2004, Bobbie Little earns an education doctorate. Her dissertation, “Factors Relating to the Achievement Gap In Selected North Carolina Rural Elementary Schools.”

I frequently hear people say of someone else and, from time to time, themselves that they got “emotional.” I am still unclear on what that means. As someone who has lived more than half of my life, I am not embarrassed to say that as I worked on this piece, tears constantly dripped from my eyes. Each tear represented a time that Bobbie made me or someone else laugh or feel encouraged and cared for.

Dr. Little’s interest in the betterment of others showed through practically everything she touched, including her doctorate dissertation. She was concerned about student achievement in elementary schools in Anson County. She researched the problem and has worked tirelessly to remedy the achievement gaps.

When you read Dr. Little’s official bio, you see the following: “Dr. Bobbie Jeanne Little is the daughter of the late Richard and Esther Rorie Little of Wadesboro, NC, and was born and raised in the Ruby Orchards area of Lilesville, NC. She has served 45 years as an educator and advocator for youth and families. She began her educational career as a Reading Tutor at McRae School in Morven, NC and then as a bus driver and teacher assistant at T.W. Bennett Elementary School in Lilesville, NC. Furthering her studies, as she worked, she would earn a certification enabling her to serve as a teacher and assistant principal in Anson County Schools. She served as principal in Montgomery County and Wake County. Later, she was Director of Education for the Central Region of North Carolina’s Department of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, she retired after 33 years of service to the State of NC.”

After retiring from the State of North Carolina, she began a new career as a college professor and clinical supervisor of student teachers in the Department of Education at Shaw University. She worked there for 10.5 years. While working at Shaw University, she also served as an adjunct professor at the University of North Carolina at Pembroke, supervising student teachers. At opportune times, Dr. Little taught at Richmond Community College, South Piedmont Community College, and Wake Technical Community Colleges as an evening adjunct faculty member.  Even though she has had an illustrious career and decades of service, she has agreed to return to Shaw University in the Fall of 2025.”

The view of Dr. Little, as she is known and called by most of her colleagues, is something like this. She is known for developing phenomenal relationships with parents and empowering them to be actively involved in their children’s education. One of her philosophies can be summed up as “For Children’s Sake.” While teaching in public schools, she often taught students who were not the highest academic achievers. However, overall, her students showed significant growth from the beginning of the year to the end of the year. When asked about this, she attributes much of this success to building relationships and communication between parents and stakeholders.

She truly believes that more learning will occur when students know that educators care about and believe in them. She believes that relationships built on compassion and trust will produce massive positive outcomes for all. While she was a classroom teacher, her firm and fair classroom management and leadership skills were recognized by her colleagues. She was encouraged to begin her studies in school administration.

Dr. Little did not go to college directly out of high school. She raised a daughter who eventually followed in her footsteps into education; she cared for both of her ailing parents until their subsequent passing. No, Bobbie’s educational journey was not typical, but the way countless others have achieved their educational success.

Mr. Michael Freeman – Retired superintendent Anson County, NC schools

As fate would have it, she worked during the day and attended college classes at night and on the weekends. She earned her Bachelor’s and Master’s in Education degrees from the University of North Carolina at Pembroke, her Education Specialist (Ed.S.), and Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) degrees from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, and continuing education credit hours from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill through Principal Executive Programs.

Bobbie considers herself “a teacher first” in whatever capacity she serves. In her 40-plus years of service, she has received numerous honors and awards, including All-State School Board recognition for outstanding service to the education of North Carolina’s Children. Her fellow board members nominated her to serve on the North Carolina School Board Association’s Legislative Committee. She was appointed as Commissioner of the North Carolina Principal Fellows Program in 2024.

Dr. Little has also found time to serve on the boards of the State Employee Credit Union, Anson Regional Medical Services, Anson County Zoning Board, Anson County 4-H Youth Promises, Closing the Achievement Advisory Board, and Anson County Juvenile Crime Prevention Council. She is serving her fourth term on the Anson County School Board, where she has served as chairman and vice chairman.

On March 30, 2012, Dr. Little became the first African American and first female in Anson County to receive the North Carolina Order of the Long Leaf Pine Award for service from Governor Beverly Purdue. Since its creation in 1963, the Long Leaf Pine Award has been presented to honor persons with a proven record of service to the State of North Carolina or some other notable achievement and to others as a gesture of friendship and goodwill. Upon being named to The Order of the Long Leaf Pine, the honoree receives a certificate by which the Governor confers upon the recipient “…the rank of Ambassador Extraordinary privileged to enjoy fully all rights granted to members of this exalted order.

Bobbie has been recognized and honored by the North Carolina School Board Association, H.O.L.L.A. (Community Impact Award), National Association of University Women (NAUW) for service from the branch, sectional, and national levels, Governor’s Volunteer Award, and churches in the community. She is a member of Anson Women’s League, Linkon Chapter #564 Order of the Eastern Star, PHA, Lifetime Member of NAACP, and Golden Life Member of Union County Alumnae Chapter, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.

Christina Rose former student of Dr. Little

In her spare time, she enjoys reading, fitness walking, traveling, and golf. When she is faced with challenging tasks, she finds solace on the golf course and fitness walking. She is a member of the Ladies Professional Golf Association-Amateurs, Sandhills and Charlotte Chapters, Carolina Golf Association, and the Seven Lakes Women’s Golf Association.

She does motivational speaking for programs serving youth during summer programs and other times. 

Did I mention that Bobbie has a forgiving heart of gold? In 1977, Bobbie bestowed upon me the honor of capturing her wedding day on film. I borrowed a large format camera from the high school photography instructor. I had only used the box-shaped Mamiya once before. I managed to find all the angles and did not miss a special moment during the wedding ceremony.  I soon ran out of film. Then I pulled out my Petri 35mm for the reminder of the ceremony. When the film was developed, I did not have one picture on the large format camera, I had loaded the film incorrectly. I did manage to get a few good shots with my Petri. I was forgiven.

It has been said that “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” Bobbie’s daughter watched her life journey and decided follow and imitate. Kimelon, is a graduate of UNC-Pembroke and UNC-Chapel Hill. She received certifications from Pfeiffer University and Gardner Webb University. She is employed by the Wake County Public School System in the Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Department serving over 40 elementary schools. She is pursuing doctoral studies currently.  Prior to this position, she taught in Anson, Durham, and Wake County Public Schools.

Webster defines a “living legend” as a person who is famous while still living for doing something extremely well.

Webster defines “famous” as widely known, honored for achievement, excellent, or first-rate.

Dr. Bobbie J. Little, my sister and a teacher first.

No Retirement For Me

Jonathan Clements reflects on the life changes driven by his terminal cancer diagnosis at age 61. Despite his prior focus on frugality and saving for retirement, he now prioritizes enjoying daily life, simplifying finances, and ensuring his family’s financial security. His philosophy embraces making meaningful memories while managing his health challenges.


I Saved And Planned For A Long One. Then I Heard From My Doctor.

By Jonathan Clements

This won’t come as a big surprise: Dying makes you look at the world in a different way—the world of money included. Among friends and family, I’m known for hard work and self-discipline. I spent almost two decades at The Wall Street Journal, churning out personal finance columns every week. I saved so diligently that I could have retired at age 51, but instead opted to write books and launch a personal finance website. My self-control extends to exercise: I’ve run or bicycled pretty much every day since 1995.

Courtesy –  Jonathan Clements

What was my reward for this life of industry, frugality and clean living? In May 2024, at age 61, I got an out-of-the-blue diagnosis of cancer, the result of a defective gene. The cancer had metastasized from my lung to my chest, liver and brain. My oncologist said I might have a year to live. I’m hoping for a tad longer because my body has responded well to treatment. Still, it’s only a matter of time before cancer gets the upper hand.

In the meantime, I find myself wandering through life with a different mindset from almost everybody else. How so? Here are 19 ways that my thinking and my finances have been transformed by my diagnosis.

1. I spent nearly my entire adult life saving like crazy so I could retire in comfort—and yet, faced with my terminal illness, I have no plans to retire. Instead, I want to keep doing what I’ve been doing for years: getting up early, making coffee, exercising, writing and editing, napping after lunch, taking an afternoon walk, enjoying an evening glass of wine. These are the things that bring me pleasure each day, and I have no desire to stop now.

2. Do I regret my decades of frugality, including previously living for 20 years in a modest house I never much liked? Far from it. The money I saved won’t go toward my retirement, but it still bought me a lot of happiness—because it allowed me to avoid financial worries for much of my adult life.

3. I could spend with reckless abandon now, but my old frugality persists. My partner, Elaine, and I had been living together for four years and were already engaged when I got my diagnosis. We married four days later, partly because she won’t qualify for Social Security survivor benefits unless I’m still alive nine months after our wedding. Since then, we’ve taken a few special trips, and we have a few more planned. But I’ll only open up my wallet so far. You won’t find me paying $5,000 to fly business class to Europe.

4. Never an enthusiastic shopper, I’m now even less inclined to buy new things. Last fall, Elaine insisted I purchase new shoes for my son’s December 2024 wedding. I wear those shoes whenever I get the chance—because it’s the only way I could justify the cost.

5. Gifting has become a top financial goal. One reason I’m not spending like crazy: I want to make sure I bequeath a healthy sum to Elaine and my two children, now in their 30s, from my previous marriage. I also made some financial gifts right away, including writing large checks to my kids and funding 529 college savings plans for my two grandsons.

6. I’ve long invested aggressively, keeping 80 percent or more of my portfolio in stock-index funds. Now that I know it’s likely I won’t live more than another year or two, I’m even more aggressive. Why? I’m no longer investing for my retirement. Instead, I’m investing for my heirs, and their time horizon is far longer than mine.

7. Because old age is no longer in the cards, all kinds of issues are off the table. I don’t have to fret over future long-term care costs, or whether to choose original Medicare or Medicare Advantage, or how to minimize my retirement tax bill. Instead, my top priority is making sure everything is in good shape for my heirs.

8. As of my 62nd birthday in January of this year, I could have applied for Social Security. But I won’t. My goal is to get Elaine a healthy stream of Social Security benefits. After much research—including a consultation with the developer of opensocialsecurity.com, a free Social Security strategy calculator—I figured out that in our situation, I should skip claiming. Instead, Elaine will claim survivor benefits based on my earnings record when I die. Once she turns 70, she’ll swap to a benefit based on her own record.

9. I thought my financial affairs were well organized. I was kidding myself. I’ve spent months shredding old tax returns, ripping up investment statements and organizing what remains. I fear that if I don’t throw out unneeded paperwork, my family will think it’s important—and I will have bequeathed them unnecessary confusion.

10. There’s always more to throw away. I’ve moved four times since 2011, shedding possessions on each occasion. Yet I keep finding more things to toss or give away. My 13 years of downsizing have taught me to be ruthless. The fact is, there’s nothing that I’ve unloaded over the past 13 years that I wish I could have back.

11. For years, I’ve been carting around a box of old mail: notes from old girlfriends, Christmas cards from 1986, letters I got while at college. Mixed in there was some really bad poetry I wrote. Did I carefully review everything in the box? Hardly. I tore up most items after a quick glance and added them to the recycling bin. Am I glad my kids will never see all this stuff? You bet.

12. My finances were pretty simple, but I’ve been simplifying them even more. I’ve closed two of my four credit cards, liquidated a small IRA I inherited from my father, and folded a solo Roth 401(k) into my Roth IRA. All this is a whole lot easier for me to do now than it will be after my death, when family members will have to produce death certificates and prove they have the authority to act.

13. I’ve added Elaine to my various insurance policies and made her the joint account holder on my two checking accounts. One of those checking accounts is debited for all utilities—gas, water, electricity, inter-net, cell phones—so it’ll be easy for her to take over the household finances.

14. Two days after I was diagnosed with cancer, I sat down with Elaine and my children to walk them through my estate plan. I quickly realized one conversation wouldn’t be enough. Stuff that was second nature to a financial nerd like me was baffling to them—things like the difference between traditional and Roth IRAs and what a “step-up in cost basis” means. Since then, I’ve fielded countless questions from Elaine and my kids.

15. Even as I tidy up my affairs, I’m also getting the house fixed up, including taking on a two-month bathroom remodeling project. I’ve learned that this is an affliction that often hits men confronting their mortality: They want to make sure all is in good order for their spouse or partner.

16. Time has always been more valuable than money, and never more so than right now. I want to devote each day to the things that I really care about, while minimizing annoyances. What if contractors or customer service reps are being unresponsive? If necessary, I’ll play the C card, telling them I don’t have long to live. Yes, it’s surprisingly effective.

17. As news of my cancer has spread, I’ve been inundated with countless messages. If I read every book about cancer that’s been recommended to me or agreed to meet with everybody who wanted to visit, I’d have no time for the things that matter to me. The good news: When a dying man says “No,” people tend to listen.

18. I still want to make a difference in the lives of others. That’s why I continue to write and edit every day. In return, I end each day feeling fulfilled and with that pleasant sense of progress that makes me happy.

19. I refuse to feel angry about my bad luck or despondent over the years I’ll never enjoy. Instead, I’m determined to make the most of each day. I’ve long thought happiness has three key ingredients: a sense of financial security, time with family and friends, and doing work I love. My diagnosis has made me even more focused on those three things.

Every few months, I have a brain MRI and a body scan to see whether the cancer has spread. Every three weeks, I get blood drawn, which may offer a warning sign of trouble. Someday—maybe next month, maybe next year—the results won’t be in my favor.

Until then, Elaine and I will continue to make plans for the four or five months that lie ahead, but no more than that. It’s the frugality thing again. We can cancel hotel rooms and rental cars without penalty. But changing airline tickets and cruises can be costly. And I sure don’t want to be confronted by both death and cancellation fees.

Jonathan Clements is the founder of www.HumbleDollar.com and the former personal finance columnist for The Wall Street Journal.

“Justice Denied: Supreme Court Declares Black Americans Have No Rights”

The Dred Scott v. Sandford case, culminating in a Supreme Court ruling on March 6, 1857, denied freedom to Dred Scott and ruled African Americans could not be U.S. citizens. This decision invalidated the Missouri Compromise and intensified national tensions over slavery, fueling the path to the Civil War and inspiring the abolitionist movement.


By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | March 6, 2025

One of the most significant legal battles in American history unfolded in St. Louis’ Old Courthouse, where Dred Scott and his wife, Harriet, fought for their freedom from enslavement. The landmark Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) not only denied their freedom but also ruled that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens and that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories. This ruling invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and pushed the nation closer to the Civil War.

Dred Scott’s Journey to the Courtroom

Dred Scott was born into enslavement in Virginia around 1799 and later moved with his enslavers, the Blow family, to St. Louis in 1830. Financial difficulties forced the Blows to sell Scott to Dr. John Emerson, a military surgeon. Scott accompanied Emerson to free territories—Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory—where slavery was prohibited under the Missouri Compromise.

During this time, Scott married Harriet Robinson, who was also enslaved. The couple had two daughters, Eliza and Lizzie. After Dr. Emerson died in 1843, his widow, Irene Emerson, continued to profit from their forced labor, hiring them out to other families.

Courtesy – Britannica – Dred Scott

In 1846, Scott took legal action, suing Irene Emerson for his freedom. The case, filed in the Old Courthouse, was based on the legal precedent that an enslaved person who had lived in a free territory was entitled to freedom. With the support of abolitionist allies and financial backing from the Blow family, Scott embarked on an eleven-year legal battle that would reach the highest Court in the land.

The Supreme Court’s Ruling and Its Fallout

On March 6, 1857, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 against Scott. The Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be U.S. citizens and therefore had no right to sue in Federal Court. Moreover, the ruling struck down the Missouri Compromise, stating that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in U.S. territories.

The Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States (Artist: George P.A. Healy)

Taney actually freed the enslaved people that he had inherited; however, he believed that the Federal government had no right to limit slavery. He mistakenly thought he could save the Union when he ruled that the Framers of the Constitution believed enslaved people were so inferior that they possessed no legal rights.

Chief Justice Taney held the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, claiming that as property, enslaved people were protected under Article V.  In addition to this unpopular opinion, Taney became even more disliked when he challenged President Lincoln’s constitutional authority to apply certain emergency measures during the Civil War. Lincoln saw him as an enemy and even defied one of Taney’s judicial decisions. Despite his critics, Taney served until he died on October 12, 1864, at the age of 87, after being Chief Justice for 28 years.

This decision deepened the nation’s divide over slavery, further fueling tensions that would lead to the Civil War. Though Scott lost his case, his courage in seeking justice contributed to the broader movement for abolition.

The Missouri Compromise and Its Repeal

Scott’s case directly challenged the Missouri Compromise (also known as the Compromise of 1820) which was, Federal legislation of the United States that balanced northern states’ desires to prevent slavery in the country with those of southern states to expand it. It admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state and declared a policy of prohibiting slavery in the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands north of the 36th parallel. The 16th United States Congress passed the legislation on March 3, 1820, and President James Monroe signed it into law on March 6, 1820.

The Missouri Compromise was a critical effort to prevent the nation from fracturing over slavery, but it was repealed in 1854 by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which allowed territories to decide the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford further dismantled any legal barriers to slavery’s expansion, emboldening pro-slavery factions and enraging abolitionists.

Legacy of the Dred Scott Case

Though the Supreme Court denied Scott’s plea for freedom, his case became a turning point in American history. The ruling heightened national tensions and galvanized anti-slavery forces, accelerating the path to the American Civil War. In 1857, Scott and his family were eventually freed by Taylor Blow, a member of his original enslaver’s family. Tragically, Scott died just a year later.

Dred and Harriet Scott’s determination to fight for their freedom stands as a testament to the resilience of those who resisted enslavement. Their struggle helped shape the national debate over slavery and ultimately contributed to the Union’s commitment to ending the institution once and for all.

The Union won the American Civil War. The war effectively ended in April 1865 when Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered his troops to Union General Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Court House in Virginia.

Making Positive Thinking and Self-talk a Priority in 2025

One goal to consider for 2025 is to learn effective ways to manage stress and implement positive thinking and self-talk.


By Cheri Bennett | Rockingham, NC | February 18, 2025

How are you stepping into 2025? Are you strolling with a pep in your step and a positive attitude, or are you dragging into the new year with negative thoughts and feelings? Research has shown that feelings of optimism and pessimism can affect our health more than we realize. One goal to consider for 2025 is to learn effective ways to manage stress and implement positive thinking and self-talk.

What is self-talk? Self-talk consists of those thoughts that endlessly run through our minds. These thoughts happen automatically and can be either negative or positive. Some of the self-talk is based on actual circumstances and is reasonable and logical.

On the other hand, self-talk can be self-created due to a lack of information or understanding on our part. Too much negative self-talk is what is often referred to in today’s popular culture as “getting in your head”. When you reach this point of self-talk, you are now less confident in yourself and your ability to manage the situation before you. This scenario can prevent individuals from reaching their highest potential or even forming positive relationships with others.

Practicing positive self-talk and positive thinking does not mean that a person does not acknowledge unpleasant situations. Instead, they have chosen to acknowledge the unpleasant circumstance positively and productively. They hope for the best outcome. They choose to be optimistic! In our lifetime, we have seen examples of great optimists, maybe some have been in your family. These people manage to maintain positive thinking and self-talk to turn crises into positive outcomes.

According to researchers, there are several health benefits associated with positive thinking. These include:

•        Increased life span

•        Lessened levels of depression

•        Lessened levels of distress and pain

•        Stronger resistance to illnesses

•        Higher quality of psychological and physical well-being

•        Greater cardiovascular health and reduced risk of death from cardiovascular disease and stroke

•        Decreased risk of death from cancer

•        Reduced risk of death from respiratory conditions

•        Decreased risk of death from infections

•        Stronger coping skills during hardships and times of stress

Although research is ongoing as to the specific reasons for these improvements associated with positive thinking and self-talk, one theory is that having a positive outlook enables one to cope better in stressful circumstances. This, in turn, reduces the negative effects of stress on the body.

It’s unclear why people who engage in positive thinking experience these health benefits. One theory is that having a positive view enables you to cope better with stressful situations, which reduces the harmful health effects of stress on your body.

Advertisement

The Connection Between Positive and Optimistic People and Healthy Lifestyle

Stress, environment, and lack of sleep can also affect mood and the ability to think positively. In the new year, strive to find ways to purposely improve in these areas. Additionally, incorporating more physical activity, not smoking, or excessively drinking alcohol are areas of lifestyle that should be examined. Registered Dietician Katey Davidson recommends incorporating foods that are filled with essential vitamins, minerals, and compounds that have the potential to lift our spirits into our diets. These foods include:

  • Dark chocolate – The flavonoids in dark chocolate have been linked to increased serotonin levels which may help alleviate symptoms of depression.
  • Bananas – The tryptophan in bananas is an amino acid that’s a precursor to serotonin. They also contain vitamin B6, which aids in mood regulation.
  • Berries – Strawberries, blueberries, and raspberries are rich in antioxidants. These antioxidants combat oxidative stress, which research has linked to mood disorders.
  • Oily fish – Salmon, mackerel, and sardines contain omega-3 fatty acids. Omega-3 fatty acids have anti-inflammatory properties which can potentially aid in combatting depression.
  • Nuts and seeds – Walnuts, chin seeds, and flaxseeds are also sources of omega-3s.
  • Oats – Oats release energy slowly, preventing the sugar spikes and dips that can impact our mood.
  • Spinach – Spinach is rich in folate. Folate is a B vitamin that helps produce the mood-regulating neurotransmitters, serotonin and dopamine.
  • Avocados – Avocados are also rich in B vitamins and monounsaturated fats. These nutrients are beneficial for neurotransmitters and brain health.
  • Green tea – Filled with amino acid L-theanine, green tea may help promote relaxation. Green tea also provides a gentle caffeine boost to kick-start your thy with alertness and mental clarity. This combination helps you stay alert and clear-headed without the jitters often associated with caffeine alone.
  • Beans – Beans are rich in protein and fiber. They also help to maintain stable blood sugar levels and prevent mood swings.
  • Poultry – Chicken and turkey are excellent sources of an amino acid called tryptophan. This amino acid boosts serotonin production, thus elevating mood.
  • Sweet potatoes – Sweet potatoes contain fiber and complex carbohydrates. This combination helps stabilize blood sugar levels and mood.
Courtesy Cheri Bennett

To help you focus on positive thinking during the new year, start by identifying areas necessary for change, checking your thoughts regularly, being open to humor, following a healthy lifestyle, surrounding yourself with positive people, and practicing positive self-talk.

If you are interested in learning more about health and wellness, contact Cheri Bennett at Cheri_ben-nett@ncsu.edu. The Richmond County Cooperative Extension Office helps provide research-based education and technology to the producers and citizens of this great county The office is located at 123 Caroline St. in Rockingham, NC and can be reached at 910-997-8255 or richmond.ces.ncsu.edu for more information.

Exit mobile version