Trump Allies Rage as Nobel Nomination Is Withdrawn

Donald Trump Jr. blasts Nobel Committee for racism, slamming its decision to honor Obama while denying Trump the Peace Prize despite recent ceasefire efforts.

By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | June 25, 2025

Donald Trump Jr. set off a contentious debate on Tuesday, accusing the Nobel Peace Prize Committee of racism. His scathing remarks, questioning the Committee’s decision to honor former President Barack Obama while overlooking his father, Donald Trump, sparked a heated discussion.

“Affirmative action is when Barack Obama gets the Nobel Peace Prize instead of Donald Trump,” Trump Jr. posted on X, formerly Twitter, sparking instant backlash and reigniting a long-standing partisan grudge over the international award.

President Donald Trump on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington D.C. on Saturday Photo/Jose LuisIS Magana

The comments came the same day Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) nominated Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his recent diplomatic efforts to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. “In recognition of his extraordinary and historic role,” Carter wrote in a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, “President Trump deserves this honor.”

Carter’s nomination adds to a growing list of Nobel bids on Trump’s behalf, following similar proposals for his roles in the Abraham Accords, Serbia-Kosovo relations, and various international talks. However, this one came with a twist: it was dropped just as another nomination was being pulled.

Oleksandr Merezhko, a senior Ukrainian lawmaker who nominated Trump last year for his proposed resolution of the War in Ukraine, told Newsweek on Tuesday that he had formally withdrawn his nomination. Merezhko, head of Ukraine’s parliamentary foreign affairs committee, said he had “lost any sort of faith and belief” in Trump’s peacemaking abilities.

“Trump promised a swift resolution to the conflict. That hasn’t happened,” Merezhko explained. “Instead, attention has shifted away from Ukraine entirely.”

Trump, who returned to the White House in January, entered office pledging to end Europe’s largest armed conflict since World War II within 24 hours. Six months later, the War grinds on, and hopes for a negotiated settlement have largely faded. Though the administration has redirected diplomatic energy toward the Middle East, critics point to recent U.S. airstrikes in Iran as contradictory to the “peacemaker” image his supporters are trying to project.

Nonetheless, Pakistan recently backed a nomination of Trump for his role in facilitating a temporary ceasefire between India and Pakistan. His allies argue the breadth of his international engagement—despite the controversies—should qualify him for Nobel consideration. 

A History of Nominations, Not Awards

The fight over Trump’s Nobel legitimacy has been building for more than a decade. Obama received the Peace Prize in 2009, just months into his presidency, a decision that was controversial even among his supporters. The Nobel Committee said the prize was awarded for Obama’s “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples,” but even Obama remarked that he was “surprised and deeply humbled.”

Republicans weren’t just surprised—they were furious. Since then, right-wing politicians and media figures have pushed hard for Trump to receive the same honor. He’s been nominated nearly every year since 2018:

  • In 2018 and 2020, for diplomatic overtures in North Korea and elsewhere.
  • Three times in 2021—twice for the Abraham Accords between Israel and several Gulf nations and once for brokering a trade deal between Serbia and Kosovo.
  • Again in 2024, for the same accomplishments.

With Trump now back in office as the 45th and 47th president, his camp has been even more vocal. This spring’s ceasefire in the Middle East between Iran and Israel offered the latest opportunity. Rep. Carter seized it—promptly submitting his nomination before any GOP rivals could.

The move may also serve Carter’s political interests. The congressman is a declared candidate for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Democrat Jon Ossoff. Securing Trump’s endorsement could be crucial in a GOP primary that may include prominent challengers like Georgia Insurance Commissioner John King.

Carter is no stranger to MAGA theatrics. Earlier this year, he introduced a satirical bill proposing that Trump be authorized to buy Greenland and rename it “Red, White, and Blueland.” 

Political Theater Meets International Recognition

Critics argue that Nobel Peace Prize nominations have become little more than political tools, citing the ease with which they can be submitted. Any national legislator, university professor, or organization leader can nominate someone for the prize by submitting a formal letter. And while hundreds of nominations are submitted annually, the vast majority never receive serious consideration.

“The fact that someone can nominate Trump doesn’t mean he’s close to winning,” one Nobel historian noted. “Nor does it reflect a consensus about the value of his actions.”

Still, the Trump camp sees a double standard.

“They gave Obama the Peace Prize before he even did anything,” Trump Jr. raged on social media. “My father literally brokered peace in the Middle East, and they ignored him. What else do you call that besides racism?”

That assertion is widely disputed. Historians and peace scholars argue that the committee’s decision to honor Obama may have been aspirational but was rooted in a different era—post-Iraq War, post-Bush presidency—when multilateralism and diplomacy were seen as urgent correctives.

In contrast, Trump’s diplomacy often comes wrapped in saber-rattling rhetoric. It is interwoven with military actions—such as his controversial decision to launch airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites last week. While hailed by some for putting pressure on Tehran, the attacks raised concerns about further destabilizing the region.

What Comes Next?

The 2026 Nobel Peace Prize will be announced in October. Whether Trump’s latest nomination makes the shortlist is anyone’s guess. The committee does not publicly comment on nominations for 50 years, and speculation usually arises only after leaks.

One thing, however, is certain: Trump’s supporters, including his son and allies like Rep. Carter, will continue pressing the case. Their underlying goal may be less about the Nobel Prize and more about reinforcing the image of Trump as a global leader—regardless of whether that vision aligns with global reality.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Alvin Bragg, Manhattan prosecutor who took on Trump, wins Democratic primary in bid for second term

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg wins Democratic primary, advancing to face GOP challenger amid high-profile Trump and Weinstein prosecutions and growing national spotlight on criminal justice.

By Jennifer Pelts | Associated Press | June 24, 2025

 Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the prosecutor who oversaw the historic hush-money case against President Donald Trump, won Tuesday’s Democratic primary as he seeks reelection.

Bragg defeated Patrick Timmins — a litigator, law professor and former Bronx assistant district attorney — to advance to November’s general election. About 70% of registered Manhattan voters are Democrats.

The first-term incumbent will face Republican Maud Maron, who was a public defender for decades and previously ran for Congress and NYC’s City Council as a Democrat.

Bragg has long been one of the nation’s most prominent prosecutors, spotlighted in TV’s “Law & Order” and other shows. The DA directs about 600 attorneys in one of the biggest local prosecutors’ offices in the U.S.

He raised the office’s profile still further by bringing the hush-money case. His predecessor, fellow Democrat Cyrus R. Vance Jr., spent years investigating various Trump dealings but didn’t procure an indictment.

Bragg decided to focus on how and why porn actor Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000 to clam up about her claims of a 2006 sexual encounter with the married Trump. The payment was made, through the then-candidate’s personal attorney, weeks before the 2016 presidential election. Trump’s company records logged the money as a legal expense.

Trump denied any wrongdoing and any sexual involvement with Daniels. But a jury last year found him guilty of 33 felony counts of falsifying business records, the first-ever felony conviction of a former — and now again — U.S. commander in chief.

rump is appealing the verdict. The Republican president has long derided the case as a political “witch hunt,” and he has kept lambasting Bragg by social media as recently as March.

Bragg, 51, was a civil rights lawyer, federal prosecutor and top deputy to New York’s attorney general before becoming DA. Raised in Harlem and educated at Harvard, he’s the first Black person to hold the post.

His tenure had a rocky start. Days after taking office in 2022, he issued a memo telling staffers not to prosecute some types of cases, nor seek bail or prison time in some others. After criticism from the police commissioner and others, Bragg apologized for creating “confusion” and said his office wasn’t easing up on serious cases.

The matter continued to animate his critics. Trump repeatedly branded Bragg “soft on crime,” and Timmins said on his campaign site homepage that the memo “has brought about increased crime and a perception of chaos in the subway and on our streets.”

Timmins — who has raised about $154,000 to Bragg’s $2.2 million since January 2022 — also pledged to do more to staunch subway crime, keep cases from getting dismissed for failure to meet legal deadlines, and prioritize hate crimes, among other things.

Bragg’s campaign emphasized his efforts to fight gun violence, help sexual assault survivors, prosecute hate crimes and go after bad landlords and exploitative bosses, among other priorities.

His office, meanwhile, has been enmeshed in a string of high-profile cases in recent months.

The office is using a post-9/11 terrorism law to prosecute UnitedHealthcare CEO killing suspect Luigi Mangione, lost a homicide trial against Marine veteran and Republican cause célèbre Daniel Penny in a case that stirred debate about subway safety and self-defense, and retried former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein on sex crimes charges.

Mangione, Penny and Weinstein all pleaded not guilty.

Bragg unexpectedly inherited the Vance-era Weinstein case after an appeals court ordered a new trial. In a jumbled outcome, jurors this month convicted Weinstein on one top charge, acquitted him of another and didn’t reach a verdict on a third, lower-level charge — which Bragg aims to bring to trial a third time.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

6 Unknowns After Trump Strikes Iran

Trump’s strike on Iran raises global stakes, questioning nuclear impact, retaliation, diplomacy, U.S. war powers, and MAGA unity in a potential turning point for his presidency.

By Olivier Knox | US News | June 23, 2025

President Donald Trump went all in this weekend on the biggest gamble of his second term: A direct military strike on Iran, aimed at destroying – or at least setting back – that country’s nuclear program. Here are six questions the historic attack raises.

1. How Effective Was It?

Trump says the American strikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s main facilities for uranium enrichment – the process of making fuel potent enough for nuclear bombs.

But neither Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth nor Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, would say whether Iran retained the ability to make a nuclear weapon. Caine said the Iranian facilities had suffered “extremely severe damage and destruction” and that it would take time to assess the actual results. That’s not just a Pentagon job: The International Atomic Energy Agency, should it gain access to the sites, could also weigh in.

2. Does Iran Retaliate?

The American strikes, like the Israeli attacks that preceded them, came at a time when Iran is historically weak. Most of its regional proxies – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon – have been bloodied, raising doubts about their ability to retaliate on Tehran’s behalf.

But the roughly 40,000 U.S. military personnel on the ground in the region could still face threats from Iran-aligned militias in Syria and Iraq, as well as the Houthis in Yemen, who withstood a U.S. military campaign earlier this year.

On Monday, Iran said it had fired a volley of missiles at the al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, home to thousands of U.S. troops. Qatar said its air defenses intercepted the rockets. There were no reports of deaths or injuries.

Iran’s parliament has approved a measure endorsing the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a choke point for international trade, according to Iranian state media. If Tehran successfully shuts it down, it could lead to higher gas prices and disrupted supply chains in Europe and the United States.

In the past, American decisionmakers told me they worried about Iranian retaliation in the form of terrorist attacks. That’s a huge question mark here – and it would sharply escalate the conflict.

3. Are the U.S.-Iran Talks Dead?

Did the U.S. attack kill off prospects of nuclear negotiations with Iran? Or did it create the conditions for coercive diplomacy?

Asked whether diplomacy was still an option, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told reporters in Istanbul: “This is not the case right now.”

In the aftermath of the strikes, senior American officials played down the prospects the attack was just the start of a broader military campaign – while retaining that as an option.

“This is most certainly not open-ended,” Hegseth said.

But the enemy gets a vote. And American warnings of, “If they hit back, we’ll hit back harder” makes this open-ended.

4. What Will Russia and China Do?

Russia and China were central to the diplomacy that yielded a nuclear deal with Iran under President Barack Obama. Trump ripped it up, saying he would quickly get a better deal. He did not, which is part of what got the world to the current volatile moment.

Iran’s foreign minister headed to Moscow on Monday to seek help from Russian President Vladimir Putin, Reuters reported. It was not immediately clear what sort of assistance Tehran wants.

China has condemned the attacks. So did Putin. But the real question is if they object enough to take practical action.

5. Is Congress Out of The ‘War’ Conversation?

Every White House I have covered – from the last days of President Bill Clinton onward – has had a testy relationship with Congress when it comes to which branch of government decides whether, when and how young Americans will be hurled into military conflict abroad.

The Constitution vests Congress with the power to declare war or authorize the use of military force. It also declares that the president is commander in chief of the armed forces.

I have not yet seen a formal administration notification to Congress laying out the legal justification for striking Iran. What will they formally invoke?

But Trump is hardly the first president to sideline Congress in matters of war. More on that in tomorrow’s newsletter.

6. Will MAGA Fissure?

After condemning his predecessors’ “forever wars” and repudiating the neocon blueprint that led to open-ended interventions in the Middle East, Trump has now delivered the neocon dream project: A military attack to try to neuter Tehran’s nuclear program and possibly precipitate regime change.

Some of his most fervent supporters had warned in the run up to this weekend’s strikes that this would amount to an “unforgivable betrayal” of his voters.

Will the movement fissure? Probably not. Trump has proved time and time again that Republicans may kvetch a bit but will eventually line up behind him.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Virginia’s Next Governor Will Be a Woman—Earle-Sears and Spanberger Set for Historic Clash

Virginia will elect its first female governor this November—either Democrat Abigail Spanberger or Republican Winsome Earle-Sears—in a race closely tied to Trump’s second term.


By Milton Kirby | Richmond, VA | June 17, 2025

It’s a primary election day in Virginia, but the real showdown is already locked in. For the first time in the Commonwealth’s 235-year history, voters are guaranteed to elect a woman as governor this November, marking a significant milestone in Virginia’s political landscape.

On one side is Abigail Spanberger, a Democrat, former CIA officer, and three-term

congresswoman known for her centrist policy stances and sharp national security credentials. On the other is Winsome Earle-Sears, a Republican and the state’s current lieutenant governor, who made history in 2021 as the first woman of color elected to statewide office in Virginia.

The matchup between Spanberger and Earle-Sears will be one of the most closely watched races in the country, offering an early reading on how voters are reacting to President Donald Trump’s second term ahead of the 2026 midterms. While Spanberger and Earle-Sears ran unopposed in their respective primaries, the campaigns they’ve launched are already sharply defined—and fiercely competitive.

Winsome Earle-Sears – Hannah Mckay/Reuters

A Historic Race, A Stark Contrast

Spanberger, 45, brings a national profile and significant fundraising muscle to the race. Backed by over $14 million in campaign funds as of early June, she has unified the Democratic Party in Virginia around a platform focused on reproductive rights, economic relief, gun safety, and protecting the state’s large federal workforce—especially from cuts pushed by the Trump administration and Elon Musk.

“Virginia’s future depends on what we protect now,” Spanberger said Monday night at a rally at her alma mater, J.R. Tucker High School in Henrico County. “Our schools, our workers, our freedoms, our safety—these are not political slogans. These are what make us who we are.”

In a nod to her bipartisan image, Spanberger also pledged to “listen more than I speak” and build bridges across party lines. As part of her campaign rollout, she’s embarked on a “Span Virginia Bus Tour,” pledging to stop in 40 cities in eight days and appear with the eventual Democratic nominees for lieutenant governor and attorney general.

Earle-Sears, 61, is pitching herself as the natural continuation of the Youngkin administration, promising to preserve what she describes as “a prosperous path” for the state of Virginia.

A former Marine and Jamaican immigrant, Earle-Sears has a compelling personal story that resonates with many conservative and independent voters. She has emphasized “parents’ rights,” expanded school choice, and lower taxes as her campaign’s top issues while casting Spanberger as a rubber stamp for President Biden and the Democratic establishment.

Photo courtesy – Abigail Spanberger

“Abigail Spanberger represents the Biden status quo—higher prices, soft-on-crime policies, and a war on parents’ rights,” said Peyton Vogel, a spokesperson for the Earle-Sears campaign. “Winsome is building a movement powered by real Virginians who want to keep Virginia on the right track.”

Yet, questions linger among Republicans about the strength of Earle-Sears’ campaign. GOP strategists have quietly expressed concerns about her lack of a central message and a weak fundraising operation—her campaign had less than $3 million in cash on hand as of June 5.

“She has a great story and can be electrifying on the stump,” one Republican operative told NBC News. “But Spanberger has the money, the discipline, and the edge.”

Trump Looms Large

Donald Trump isn’t on the ballot, but his influence saturates the race.

Spanberger has positioned herself as a counterweight to Trump’s second-term agenda, especially his aggressive downsizing of the federal government—a major employer in Virginia. At a March event, she warned that cuts orchestrated by Trump and former DOGE director Elon Musk are threatening the livelihoods of thousands.

“We know that Virginia’s economy is tied to the work of people serving in federal agencies like the IRS, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Library of Congress,” Spanberger told supporters. “I will stand up for them and for the stability they bring to our state.”

More than 340,000 federal workers live in Virginia, many of whom are facing uncertainty amid ongoing lawsuits and agency reorganizations. While Virginia’s state revenue has remained stable through April, the long-term impact of Trump’s cuts on local economies is still unfolding.

Meanwhile, Earle-Sears has largely avoided commenting on the federal workforce issue, instead focusing on her allegiance to Youngkin-era policies. But Democrats have seized on the opportunity, portraying her as out of touch with one of the state’s largest and most politically engaged constituencies.

The Stakes Beyond the Governor’s Race

In addition to the governor’s mansion, Virginians will vote in November for lieutenant governor, attorney general, and all 100 seats in the House of Delegates. While the state Senate is not up for re-election, the Democrats currently control both legislative chambers. They also hold a slim 51-49 majority in the House, which Republicans hope to overturn.

The Democratic primary for lieutenant governor is crowded, with six candidates, including state Sens. Ghazala Hashmi and Aaron Rouse, former Richmond mayor Levar Stoney, and others. For attorney general, voters will choose between former delegate Jay Jones and Henrico County Commonwealth’s Attorney Shannon Taylor—both of whom have promised to “stand up to Trump” if elected.

The general election contest will pit the winner against incumbent Republican Jason Miyares, who has warned that Democrats will misuse the office to launch partisan attacks on Trump. “The law is a shield, not a sword,” said Miyares’ spokesperson, Alex Cofield.

Reproductive Rights, Guns, and Affordability

Spanberger’s campaign has focused heavily on access to abortion—a key issue for Virginia Democrats since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Virginia remains one of the last Southern states with access to abortion care until viability. Spanberger supports codifying those protections in state law.

She has also received the endorsement of Moms Demand Action, a national gun safety group, and pledged to pass laws banning high-capacity magazines, ghost guns, and assault-style weapons—measures previously vetoed by Gov. Youngkin.

“As a former law enforcement officer, I know gun violence prevention is pro-police,” she said in Alexandria during her endorsement event. “The fewer ghost guns on our streets, the safer our communities.”

Spanberger’s economic agenda includes proposals to tackle housing affordability, cap prescription drug prices, and lower energy costs—issues she argues will appeal to moderates and working-class voters.

Earle-Sears, meanwhile, has emphasized school reform, tax cuts, and opposition to what she calls “radical social policies.” Though she has avoided spelling out specific proposals, she has frequently invoked Youngkin’s record, hoping his popularity will buoy her bid.

A Defining Moment

For decades, Virginia’s off-year gubernatorial election has served as a bellwether for the national political climate. Since 1977, the party not in the White House has won 11 out of 13 times.

But political trends are shifting. Kamala Harris carried the state in 2024 by six points, and Democrats now hold a fragile edge in the urban and suburban regions that dominate voter turnout. Whether Spanberger can harness dissatisfaction with Trump’s federal cuts—and whether Earle-Sears can rekindle the energy that propelled Youngkin to victory in 2021—will define the final months of this campaign.

Regardless of the outcome, history is guaranteed. When Virginians head to the polls on November 4, they will elect the first female governor in the state’s history—a milestone long overdue.

This post contains affiliate links, which means a small commission may be earned if a purchase is made through them, at no extra cost to you.

DeKalb’s Youth, Homeless, and Pets Find Hope Under New Initiatives

DeKalb CEO Lorraine Cochran-Johnson announces major summer initiatives including youth jobs, housing support, property tax updates, and free dog adoptions across the county.


By Milton Kirby | Decatur, GA | June 6, 2025

DeKalb County CEO Lorraine Cochran-Johnson is setting the pace for a transformative summer, unveiling bold new initiatives aimed at strengthening the futures of the county’s youth, stabilizing families facing housing insecurity, simplifying property tax processes, and increasing access to pet adoption.

With the theme “Mission Possible” powering her 2025 State of the County address, Cochran-Johnson is matching words with action—and residents across the county are beginning to feel the impact.

Youth Employment: A Launchpad for the Future

The DeKalb Summer Youth Employment Program (DSYEP) kicked off with great energy as more than 380 students filled the Porter Sanford III Performing Arts Center for orientation and a celebratory event. This five-week, paid internship program introduces high school students to real-world job experiences across various departments, including government, finance, media, and technology.

Backed by a $700,000 investment, DSYEP isn’t just about filling summer schedules. It’s about igniting purpose and preparing tomorrow’s workforce. CEO Cochran-Johnson told students, “This isn’t just a job—it’s a launchpad. To whom much is given, much is required.”

She emphasized how rare such opportunities are in today’s climate, especially with many Job Corps programs having recently closed their doors. But in DeKalb, she said, “Students are being seen, supported, and equipped.”

The event also featured insights from Superintendent Dr. Devon Horton and former Harlem Globetrotter Harold Hubbard, as well as workshops on job readiness, financial literacy, and psychological safety in the workplace.

“This is your moment,” Cochran-Johnson told the students. “And I couldn’t be more proud to be your CEO.” 

Housing Instability Program: Meeting Urgent Needs

In a significant move to combat homelessness, CEO Cochran-Johnson announced the launch of DeKalb County’s $7.8 million Housing Stability Initiative (HSI), scheduled to begin on July 1, 2025.

Funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the HSI program will offer targeted assistance to individuals and families experiencing or at risk of homelessness. The initiative addresses the root causes of instability, providing a range of services from rental assistance and case management to childcare coordination and substance use counseling.

“This funding allows us to directly address the urgent needs of individuals and families who are struggling to remain housed or to exit homelessness,” said Cochran-Johnson. “We’re opening doors—literally and figuratively.”

The program will prioritize the most vulnerable residents, including survivors of domestic violence and human trafficking. Residents must apply through the DeKalb Coordinated Entry System by calling 404-687-3500 on weekdays.

Transparency in Tax Assessments

On June 3, the 2025 Annual Notices of Assessment were mailed to DeKalb County property owners, signaling the start of the annual window for property tax appeals.

Each notice details the appraised value of residential or commercial property as of January 1, a valuation used to determine property taxes under Georgia law. Property owners have 45 days from the date of the notice to file an appeal.

Appeals can be submitted:

This year’s notices reflect recent changes in state legislation. The tax estimate section has been modified or removed, depending on the information provided by each taxing jurisdiction. Instead, some notices may show a preliminary roll-back rate.

While these changes may cause some confusion, the county encourages property owners to review their notices carefully and reach out for clarification if needed.

Free Dog Fridays: Homes for Pups, Hope for Families

DeKalb County has partnered with the LifeLine Animal Project to make pet adoption easier and more affordable this summer. Through the Free Dog Fridays program, residents can adopt dogs at no cost every Friday.

Free Dog Friday – Help a pet find a new home

With shelters across Fulton and DeKalb counties facing surges in owner surrenders, the initiative is designed to reduce overcrowding and help more animals find permanent, loving homes. Adoption packages include essential veterinary services, such as spay/neuter surgery, vaccinations, and microchipping.

Free Dog Fridays take place at LifeLine’s central shelter locations and partner shelters, making it easy for families and individuals to meet their new best friends.

A Season of Action—and Hope

CEO Lorraine Cochran-Johnson’s recent efforts reflect a bold, people-centered vision for DeKalb County. Whether by empowering young people, addressing housing insecurity, improving government transparency, or connecting families with pets, the common thread is access to opportunities.

These initiatives highlight the kind of leadership that doesn’t just promise change—it delivers it.

“The mission is possible,” said Cochran-Johnson, echoing her address. “And together, we will continue building a DeKalb County that works for everyone.”

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Hegseth Orders Navy Ship Honoring Civil Rights Icon Renamed

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth orders the U.S. Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, targeting civil rights-named ships during Pride Month amid DEI rollback.

by Michael Luciano | June 3, 2025

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has ordered the U.S. Navy to rename at least one vessel that currently honors a civil rights icon.

On Tuesday, Military.com reported that it reviewed a memo from the Office of the Secretary of the Navy, which is formulating plans to rename the USNS Harvey Milk. The vessel is an oiler ship named for gay rights activist Harvey Milk, who was a San Francisco city councilor when he was assassinated in 1978. A defense official confirmed to the website that the Navy is preparing to rename the ship after Hegseth ordered Navy Secretary John Phelan to do so.

Milk served in the Navy during the Korean War, though he was not deployed. He was given a “less than honorable” discharge in 1955 after being questioned about his sexual orientation.

“The official also said that the timing of the announcement — occurring during Pride month — was intentional,” Military.com added.

Earlier in the day, Ed O’Keefe of CBS News reported that the Navy was considering renaming several ships, including the Milk, USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez, and USNS Medgar Evers.

Hegseth has made purging diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives from the military a top priority. In a memo last month, Hegseth ordered a review of books in military libraries that address sexism and racism. He said such publications were “promoting divisive concepts and gender ideology” that “are incompatible with the Department’s core mission.” The secretary also said that race and sex would not be considered when admitting applicants to U.S. military academies.

The post Hegseth Orders Navy Ship Honoring Civil Rights Icon Renamed first appeared on Mediaite.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Despite Pushback From Students and Alumni, DeSantis Ally Picked to Lead FAMU

“Discover expert tips, proven strategies, and essential tools to boost website traffic, increase conversions, and improve your SEO rankings with our comprehensive digital marketing guide.

Many in the Florida A&M community don’t believe that Marva Johnson has the experience needed to lead the storied institution

By Brandon TensleyAallyah Wright and Ja’Caiya Y. Stephens | May 16, 2025

The Florida A&M University Board of Trustees on Friday picked Marva Johnson as the school’s 13th president in an 8-4 vote. Her selection is subject to confirmation by the 17-member Florida Board of Governors, which oversees the state’s public university system.

This decision comes as a blow to many students and alumni. Over the past week, they mounted fierce opposition to Johnson’s candidacy, arguing that the current group vice president of state government affairs at Charter Communications lacks the experience needed to lead the state’s flagship historically Black school.

These tensions bubbled over at a moment when other HBCUs across the South are struggling to find leadership that enjoys the confidence of their respective communities.

“We shouldn’t be seen as a training ground for someone who doesn’t have any academic experience,” Gregg Bishop, who takes pride in his alma mater, told Capital B. “Yes, she may have business experience, but for us, it’s academics first.”

Johnson hasn’t responded to Capital B’s request for comment.

FAMU stands out as the first HBCU to offer its students a nationally accredited journalism program. The school is also one of the top producers of Black graduates with doctoral degrees in science and engineering and sits in the top five of the Black land-grant universities that generate the most annual economic impact for their graduates. FAMU has been the highest-ranked public HBCU for six consecutive years.

From its academic rigor to its campus culture, FAMU is “unmatched,” Bishop added. Plus, the school accepted him — a former college dropout with a 1.9 grade point average. After working in the tech industry for seven years, he returned to college, graduating from FAMU in 2005 with a bachelor’s degree in business administration.

“I have a special love for FAMU because FAMU gave me the opportunity to get my bachelor’s degree. Then, I went to Florida State University and got my master’s degree. Because of that, I was able to have over a decade-long career in government in New York City,” said Bishop, a member of FAMU’s School of Journalism and Graphic Communication Board of Visitors.

An ally of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Johnson was one of four people in the running to be the university’s next leader.

While some worry that she’ll push DeSantis’ anti-diversity agenda, the biggest concern, according to Bishop, is that she won’t last long in the position, a situation that would only fuel instability. The university’s next president, he argued, ought to be selected based not on political ties but on commitment to the FAMU community.

The three other people who were being considered were Donald Palm, FAMU’s executive vice president and chief operating officer; Gerald Hector, the University of Central Florida’s senior vice president for administration and finance; and Rondall Allen, the University of Maryland Eastern Shore’s provost and vice president for academic affairs.

FAMU’s National Alumni Association endorsed Palm as its preferred candidate.

Students and alumni were speaking out because they wanted to make sure that the people in charge of hiring think long and hard about protecting the university’s future, Erica Stallworth, a 2002 FAMU graduate, told Capital B.

“I’m a second-generation HBCU graduate, and I’m proud to be a Rattler,” she said, referring to the school’s mascot. “We need someone who understands — and wants to understand — our culture.”

“More than just a school”

Others in the FAMU community share Bishop and Stallworth’s concerns.

Elijah Hooks, a political science major, started a petition that’s received more than 12,000 signatures. The document describes Johnson, because of her ties to DeSantis, as someone who is out of step with a school that values “teaching our full history” and who would be “learning on the job.”

“To me, FAMU represents the epitome of Black excellence,” Hooks, the co-chair of the grassroots coalition FAMU Deserves Better, told Capital B. “It’s a place where we cultivate Black leaders across every field — from health and engineering, to politics and the arts.”

For Hooks and many of his peers, having a president who embodies these ideals is non-negotiable. The person in this role is “more than a figurehead,” he said — they also “set the tone” for the rest of the school.

Though Johnson previously served on the Florida State Board of Education, her experience is rooted in K-12 policy and corporate governance. She also was an elector for Donald Trump in 2020, and has been appointed to several state positions by Republican governors.

Like Bishop, Stallworth, and Hooks, Hannah Kirby, a broadcast journalism major, believes that the next FAMU president should be someone who understands student life at the university, which she calls her “dream school.”

“Undergraduate students are the heart and soul of this campus,” she told Capital B. “If the president doesn’t understand or support students, that’s a recipe for disaster.”

After attending the open forums for the presidential finalists, Kirby said that Johnson’s lack of academic leadership experience stood out to her.

“Going from lobbying to running a university is a huge leap,” she said. “FAMU is more than just a school. It is a cultural institution that shapes communities.”

One of the university’s most famous alumni, the producer Will Packer, also has denounced Johnson. He said in a video he posted on Instagram, “Right this very minute, a group of activist Republicans is trying to put in the highest position of power someone who is solidly and objectively unqualified for it.”

Packer, whose credits include the 2017 movie Girls Trip, posted the video following a roiling town hall last week. FAMU alumni, boosters, and others criticized Johnson as a “political plant” and threw their support behind Palm.

“What we cannot allow is a hostile takeover by someone who is aligned with a party that has loudly and proudly espoused ideologies that attack diversity and diverse institutions, attacked equitable economics, and attacked inclusive principles — the exact pillars that institutions like FAMU were built upon,” Packer, who didn’t respond to Capital B’s request for comment, said in the video.

Alan Levine, the vice chair of the Florida Board of Governors, criticized the backlash to Johnson, calling it “unfair, uninformed, and not helpful to the process.”

“It’s odd to me that an organized effort is underway to target a candidate before she has been given an opportunity to be interviewed by the Board of Trustees in an open forum,” he told the Tallahassee Democrat last week.

“The Board of Trustees should focus on the qualities of their candidates, and decide which candidate they believe they, as a board, will be able to partner with to deliver the results the BOG, legislature, governor, and most importantly, students expect,” Levine added.

A problem beyond Florida

FAMU isn’t the only HBCU scrambling to find qualified leadership.

At the beginning of the month, Marcus Thompson suddenly resigned as the president of Mississippi’s Jackson State University. The school has had nine presidents over the past 15 years, and alumni — and Gov. Tate Reeves — are demanding greater transparency in its search and vetting process.

Meanwhile, in March, Georgia’s Albany State University named Robert Scott as its next president. But this announcement followed a contentious period: Earlier this year, alumni and their supporters collected more than 900 signatures to make clear that they didn’t want Lawrence Drake, who was the university’s interim president, to assume a permanent role. The petitioners argued that Drake, who worked at the Coca-Cola Co. for 21 years, wasn’t qualified.

Together, these developments underscore the wider leadership challenges facing HBCUs.

In a letter, Florida’s state NAACP chapter expressed “profound concern” about Johnson’s being included in the pool of candidates and threatened to “take all appropriate advocacy and legal actions” over the selection process.

Deveron Gibbons, the chair of the presidential search committee, has defended the process and the qualifications of all four candidates.

The committee “has conducted a transparent, inclusive process and identified four exceptional candidates to move forward,” Gibbons, who’s also the vice chair of FAMU’s Board of Trustees, said in a statement. “Each brings a strong record of leadership.”

Bishop wants others to get involved in their alumni associations, donate to their universities, and boost their civic engagement in everything from parent–teacher associations to state politics. 

He predicts that alumni and students will continue to speak out against Johnson.

“She worked in the private sector. She should be the next CEO of a company, not the next CEO of a university,” Bishop said. “What you’re hearing from the alumni community is that to have someone with zero experience shepherd one of the flagship universities of Florida … it’s concerning.”

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Brown v. Board of Education: The Supreme Court Ruling That Changed America

Briggs v. Elliott helped end school segregation. Discover the personal sacrifice of the Briggs family in the landmark Brown v. Board decision.


By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | May 31, 2025

On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that would forever alter the course of American history. In a unanimous ruling, the Court declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, bringing an end to the legal foundation of the “separate but equal” doctrine that had stood for nearly 60 years since Plessy v. Ferguson.

The case, officially titled Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, was one of the most significant legal victories of the Civil Rights Movement. It addressed whether separating children in public schools based on race violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the Court, stating clearly:

Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.

This decision did more than desegregate schools. It marked a pivotal moment in the nation’s struggle for racial justice and paved the way for future civil rights legislation, including the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964.

A Case that Began in Topeka—and Beyond

Although the case was named after Oliver Brown, a Black parent in Topeka, Kansas, it represented a group of lawsuits from across the country. Brown had tried to enroll his daughter in a nearby white elementary school. Brown and other parents sued the Topeka Board of Education when she was denied.

But Topeka was not alone. Brown v. Board was a consolidation of five separate cases from different states:

  1. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
  2. Briggs v. Elliott – South Carolina
  3. Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County – Virginia
  4. Gebhart v. Belton – Delaware
  5. Bolling v. Sharpe – Washington, D.C.

South Carolina’s Briggs v. Elliott was the earliest filed and arguably the most courageous. It originated in Clarendon County, where Black parents, led by Rev. J.A. DeLaine, challenged the appalling disparities between Black and white schools. At the time, Black children in Clarendon County attended schools with no buses, crumbling buildings, outdated books, and underpaid teachers, despite tax dollars funding white schools at nearly ten times the rate.

When their petitions for equal resources were ignored, the case became a direct challenge to segregation. The lead plaintiff was Harry Briggs, a gas station attendant, and the defendant was R.W. Elliott, chairman of the county’s school board.

According to Nate Briggs, son of Harry Briggs, Sr., “participation in the case took a terrible toll on the family. So much so, that Harry Briggs, Sr. had to move his family away from Summerton, South Carolina, for their safety and to find steady work. The personal cost of standing up for justice was high—but it was a sacrifice that helped move the nation forward.”

Though the federal Court ruled against them, one judge, J. Waties Waring, issued a powerful dissent, calling segregation inherently unequal. His words laid the intellectual groundwork for what would soon become national law.

The Man Who Argued the Case: Thurgood Marshall

Thurgood Marshall, the brilliant attorney who served as chief counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, stood at the center of this legal battle. Marshall, who was 45 during the Brown arguments, had already established a reputation for himself by fighting segregation in cases such as Sweatt v. Painter and Smith v. Allwright.

Marshall was born on July 2, 1908, in Baltimore, Maryland. After being denied admission to the University of Maryland Law School due to segregation, he attended Howard University School of Law, where he graduated first in his class. By the time of Brown, he had already argued numerous cases before the Supreme Court and would go on to argue a total of 32 cases, winning 29.

His victory in Brown was more than a professional achievement. It was a decisive blow against legalized racism, and it positioned him to become the first African American U.S. Supreme Court Justice in 1967.

After the Ruling: Resistance and Reform

While the decision was celebrated across much of the country, its implementation was met with fierce resistance, especially in the South. Some states openly defied the ruling. Others delayed desegregation through legal maneuvers or token compliance.

Recognizing the challenge, the Court issued a follow-up decision in Brown II on May 31, 1955, instructing states to carry out desegregation “with all deliberate speed.” Still, progress was slow. Many Black students and families continued to face threats, intimidation, and legal battles in the years that followed.

Despite the resistance, the decision in Brown v. Board became a moral and legal cornerstone of the Civil Rights Movement. It led to increased momentum for equality, energized grassroots activism, and showed that the highest Court in the land was willing to challenge systemic racism.

Legacy

Today, more than 70 years later, Brown v. Board of Education remains a symbol of hope, courage, and constitutional justice. It reminds us of the power of the law to correct injustice—and the power of ordinary people, like the Briggs family and Rev. DeLaine, to change the course of a nation.

The decision did not eradicate racism or inequality, but it signaled that the Constitution could be a tool for progress. It also proved that when legal strategy, moral clarity, and community courage come together, history can be rewritten.

Brown v. Board was not just a court case. It was a national awakening…

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Maryland’s Wes Moore says he’s not running for president but high-profile stops keep chatter alive

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore denies 2028 presidential run, focuses on state economy, budget deficit, and boosting Maryland business despite rising national profile.


By Brian Witte – AP | Annapolis, MD | May 29, 2025

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, often mentioned among Democrats as a potential presidential candidate, has been saying for months that he isn’t running for the White House in 2028.

That hasn’t stopped persistent talk about his future political plans, especially when he continues to make appearances outside Maryland that raise his national profile. On Friday, he’s traveling to speak at the Blue Palmetto Dinner in the early presidential primary state of South Carolina.

When asked about 2028, though, the governor is clear.

“I’m not running,” Moore told The Associated Press in an interview Wednesday. He also said, when asked, that he isn’t trying to get his name in the conversation for a potential vice presidential candidacy, either.

The trip to South Carolina includes meetings with business prospects, Moore said.

“And people should get very used to me going all over the country bringing business back to Maryland, because that’s exactly what I plan on doing as long as I’m the governor of the state,” Moore said after a dedication in Annapolis for a memorial to former Rep. Parren Mitchell, the state’s first Black congressman.

In the third year of his first term, Moore plans to run for reelection next year in heavily Democratic Maryland. He says being the state’s governor during a challenging time has his full attention.

That includes working to navigate the difficulties of dramatic federal downsizing under the Trump administration, which poses an outsized economic impact on Maryland. The state is home to a large number of federal workers toiling in the shadow of the nation’s capital — about 256,000 Marylanders received a federal W-2 in 2021, representing about 8% of taxpayers, according to an analysis by the state’s comptroller.

Earlier this month, Maryland lost its triple-A bond rating from the Moody’s economic rating agency. State officials had cited the rating for more than 50 years as a sign of strong fiscal stewardship that enabled the state to pay the lowest rates when it sells bonds to pay for infrastructure. Two other rating agencies, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, have recently affirmed the state’s triple-A bond rating.

Moore and other leading Democrats in the state blamed the Trump administration’s downsizing for the Moody’s downgrade.

The governor just had the most challenging legislative session of his tenure. Facing a $3.3 billion budget deficit, he worked with the legislature, which is controlled by Democrats, to reach a balanced budget that included about $2 billion in spending cuts throughout state government and about $1.6 billion in new revenues through tax and fee increases.

Most of the tax increases were imposed on high-income residents, including two new higher tax brackets for people who make more than $500,000 and a new 2% tax on capital gains for people with income over $350,000. The governor has said most Marylanders won’t see a tax increase, and some will receive a modest tax cut. Still, Maryland Republicans have been pouncing on the tax increases — an issue sure to be raised often by the GOP’s next nominee for governor.

Moore, 46, is the state’s first Black governor, and the only Black governor currently serving. He is the former CEO of the Robin Hood Foundation, an anti-poverty nonprofit. He also is a Rhodes scholar and a combat veteran who served in Afghanistan.

Ad

won Maryland’s governorship in his first bid for public office in a landslide in 2022, after prevailing in a crowded Democratic primary that included former national party chairman and former U.S. Labor Secretary Tom Perez.

In a state that is about 30% Black, Moore was recently criticized by the state’s Legislative Black Caucus for vetoing a bill to study potential reparations for slavery. Moore said the idea has been studied enough and now is the time to “focus on the work itself” of building a better economy for all. That includes narrowing the racial wealth gap, expanding homeownership, uplifting entrepreneurs of color and closing the foundational disparities that lead to inequality — from food insecurity to education.

Democrats outnumber Republicans 2-1 in Maryland, making the state largely safe for Democratic incumbents.

Still, former Republican Gov. Larry Hogan won the first of his two terms by campaigning heavily against tax increases approved during the tenure of his Democratic predecessor, prompting some to wonder if the popular Hogan might run for governor again. Maryland limits a governor to two consecutive terms, but a former two-term governor could seek another term after sitting out one.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

House Passes Trump’s Deficit-Swelling Tax Bill, With Big Medicaid Changes


By Riley Beggin, USA TODAY Washington, DC | May 22, 2025

Americans could see major changes to Medicaid, food stamps, border security and taxes under a sweeping Republican bill that passed the U. S. House early on May 22.

The proposal, which President Donald Trump has dubbed the “big, beautiful bill,” would enact Trump’s major campaign promises like eliminating taxes on workers’ tips and overtime and is likely to be one of the most significant pieces of legislation that will be passed during his second term in the Oval Office.

It passed the House 215-214, with all Democrats and two Republicans – Reps. Th Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio – voting against it after a marathon all-night debate. Republicans had only three ‘no’ votes to spare in the closely-divided House.

As recently as May 20, it wasn’t clear House Republicans would be able to get the bill endorsed by Trump across the finish line.

A handful of Republicans from primarily Democratic states were holding out on raising a tax deduction cap that would benefit their constituents, while fiscal conservatives remained concerned about the cost of the legislation, which is expected to add around $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. The tax plan has rattled stock markets in recent days as investors worry about the ballooning debt.

Trump met personally with the GOP conference that morning, urging them to stop pushing for more changes and get behind the bill. “Failure is simply not an option,” House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, said after the meeting.

House vote count on Trump tax bill

After several marathon days of negotiations, including a May 21 meeting at the Trump White House, Republican leadership made additional changes and enough lawmakers came on board to pass it.

“What we’re going to do here this morning is truly historic, and it will make all the difference in the daily lives of hard working Americans,” Johnson said in a floor speech shortly before the bill passed.

Apart from Massie and Davidson, three other Republicans did not vote in support of the legislation. Rep. Andy Harris, R-Maryland, voted present, which would have effectively been an opposition vote if the rest of the lawmakers had tied. Harris is the chairman of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, which sought greater cuts in spending in the package.

Reps. David Schweikert of Arizona and Andrew Gabarino of New York missed the vote entirely.

Democrats have slammed the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy at the expense of people who benefit from social safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP.

“This is one big, ugly bill that House Republicans are trying to jam down the throats of the American people under the cover of darkness,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, said on the House floor in an early morning speech before the final vote.

Still, it has a long way to go before it becomes law. The bill will next go to the Senate, which has already made clear that it plans to make changes. If that happens, the two chambers would still have to hash out the details capable of winning majority votes before they can send it to Trump’s desk to be signed into law.

The clock is ticking: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent warned that the U.S. is likely to hit the debt ceiling in August, and urged lawmakers to finalize the package – which raises the debt ceiling by $4 trillion – before leaving for their summer recess at the end of July.

Trump urges Senate to act swiftly on bill

Trump commended the House passage of the legislation and urged quick Senate action by highlighting priorities such as no taxes on tips, overtime or interest on loans for American-made cars.

He also cited tougher border security measures such as pay raises for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection agents.

Trump chided Democrats for opposing the measure and supporting “Open Borders” and transgender participants in women’s sports.

“Now, it’s time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!” Trump said in a social media post. “There is no time to waste.”

What is in the bill?

The sweeping House bill is expected to touch many corners of American life, from their wallets and healthcare to the southern border and the national debt.

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered income tax rates for all income groups but disproportionately benefitted the highest earners, is set to expire at the end of 2025. The bill would make those tax rates permanent at an expected cost of more than $2 trillion over the next 10 years.

No taxes on tips and overtime

The bill would also implement temporary tax breaks for tipped wages and overtime, create a new temporary deduction for the interest on loans for American-made cars, and create a new tax deduction for people over age 65. Children under 8 years old could also benefit from a new “Trump” savings account seeded with $1,000 from the federal government.

7.6 million would lose Medicaid

Medicaid, the program that provides health insurance to more than 71 million low-income Americans, would undergo big changes. That includes new work requirements for adults enrolled in Medicaid expansion beginning in December of 2026, more frequent eligibility checks, and disincentives for states to cover unauthorized migrant children, among other provisions.

Collectively, the Medicaid proposal would save at least $625 billion and cause 7.6 million Americans to lose their health insurance over the next 10 years, according to initial estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Trump warned Republicans who wanted to squeeze additional changes out of the health insurance program, telling them “Don’t f‒‒‒ around with Medicaid,” at a May 20 meeting.

The proposal would also implement new requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP or food stamps, which provides assistance to around 42 million Americans. That would save up to $300 billion over the next ten years and shift more of the cost of the program to states.

Big spending on border security, missile defense

The bill would put more than $140 billion toward Trump’s plan to crack down on illegal immigration, including $50 billion for a border wall, $45 billion for detention centers, $8 billion for immigration officers and $14 billion for deportations.

It would also put around $150 billion toward defense spending, including $20 billion that would go, in part, to creating a “Golden Dome” missile defense system that Trump has promoted.

Blue state tax benefits, green energy, vouchers

Residents of high-tax states like New York, California and New Jersey making under $500,000 will be able to claim a deduction of up to $40,000 on their federal returns for taxes paid to their state and local governments – which those holdout lawmakers pushed up from the initially-proposed $30,000. Right now, the cap on that deduction is $10,000.

The bill would eliminate several green energy provisions passed under former President Joe Biden, such as tax credits for electric vehicles and renewable energy, and would accelerate permitting for fossil fuel projects.

Families could use new vouchers collectively worth billions dollars for education outside of public schools, such as for private schools, parochial schools or homeschooling. Meanwhile, private universities could face new taxes for large endowments.

Contributing: Bart Jansen

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

Exit mobile version