Featured

A Letter from the Publisher: Investing in the Truth

To our readers and neighbors,

When we launched The Truth Seekers Journal (TSJ), our mission was simple: to restore trust in local journalism by focusing on verified facts, transparency, and the stories that truly shape our community.

Today, I am proud to share that the “pulse” of this journal is stronger than ever. This past week, we reached a significant turning point in our growth. Our page views have tripled, and most importantly, our Returning Visits have grown by over 1,000%. This tells me that TSJ isn’t just a site you stumble upon. It is becoming a trusted resource you rely on.

National Recognition

I am also honored to announce that The Truth Seekers Journal has been awarded a prestigious rural reporting grant from Grist, following a highly competitive national selection process. Grist is a national leader in environmental and justice journalism.

Furthermore, to ensure we maintain the highest ethical standards, we have been formally accepted as members of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), the Online News Association (ONA), the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), and the Atlanta Press Club. These affiliations are our “gold standard” promise to you that our reporting is independent, ethical, and professional.

Expanding Our Expertise

Growth isn’t just about numbers; it’s about the depth of the stories we can tell. I am thrilled to highlight two key pillars of our expanded editorial team:

  • Dr. Florita Bell Griffin has joined us as a Contributing Writer and Systems Analyst. Dr. Griffin will lead our coverage in the AI, Science, and Technology sectors. Her expertise allows us to move beyond the headlines, providing our readers with deep-dive analysis on how emerging technologies and infrastructure projects impact our local economy and daily lives..
  • Ted Knorr, our resident historian, continues to bridge the gap between our past and present through his twice-monthly column, “Shadow Ball: Learning More About Negro League History.” Many of you have already engaged with Ted by submitting questions and sharing family stories, making “Shadow Ball” a true cornerstone of our community dialogue.

The Road Ahead

We are no longer just a news site; we are a growing civic institution. Whether we are investigating DeKalb data centers or documenting the rich history of the South, our goal remains the same: to give you the information you need to understand your community and shape your future.

Thank you for being the most important part of this journey. We are just getting started.

In Truth,

Milton Kirby

Founder & Publisher, The Truth Seekers Journal

Featured

Carter G. Woodson – the Father of Black History

Carter Godwin Woodson, known as the Father of Black History, was a pioneering historian, author, journalist, and educator who dedicated his life to documenting and promoting African American history.

By Milton Kirby | Decatur, GA | February 4, 2025

Carter Godwin Woodson, known as the “Father of Black History,” was a pioneering historian, author, journalist, and educator who dedicated his life to documenting and promoting African American history. Born on December 19, 1875, in New Canton, Virginia, Woodson’s work laid the foundation for studying and recognizing Black history in the United States.

A Scholar and Educator

Woodson’s academic career was characterized by tenacity and excellence. He attended Lincoln University in Pennsylvania and Berea College in Kentucky before earning his doctorate from Harvard University, becoming the second African American to do so after W.E.B. Du Bois. He later served as the Dean of the School of Arts and Sciences at Howard University, where he emphasized the value of Black scholarship. Woodson taught in both public and collegiate settings, trained researchers and staff members, and authored numerous books and articles on Black history. From 1919 to 1920, he also served as the Dean of the School of Liberal Arts and Head of the Graduate Faculty at Howard University.

Courtesy Smithsonian

Founding the Study of Black History

In 1915, Woodson founded the Association for the Study of African American Life and History (ASALH) to promote research and education on Black heritage. He also established the Associated Publishers, a company dedicated to publishing works by and about African Americans. From his home in Washington, D.C.’s Shaw neighborhood, he led ASALH’s initiatives and wrote extensively on Black history, including managing The Journal of Negro History (now The Journal of African American History).

Woodson’s efforts to establish African American history as an essential part of the larger American narrative extended beyond his organizations and publications. His work inspired educators nationwide to incorporate Black history into their curricula, and many sought his advice and resources for classroom use.

The Birth of Black History Month

In 1926, Woodson launched Negro History Week to highlight the contributions of Black Americans. He selected the second week of February to coincide with the birthdays of Frederick Douglass (February 14) and Abraham Lincoln (February 12). Over time, this observance gained nationwide recognition and expanded into Black History Month, which was officially designated by the U.S. government in 1976. President Gerald Ford urged Americans to “seize the opportunity to honor the too-often neglected accomplishments of Black Americans.”

A Lasting Legacy

Woodson spent the last 28 years of his life in his Washington, D.C., home, where he continued his research and advocacy until his passing on April 3, 1950, at the age of 74. Recognizing his immense contributions, President Barack Obama designated the Carter G. Woodson Home as a National Historic Site in 2016. Located at 1538 Ninth Street NW, this site is preserved by the National Park Service as a testament to his legacy.

The Importance of the Carter G. Woodson Home

Woodson’s historic home functioned as the headquarters for ASALH and played a crucial role in advancing Black history education. From this location, he:

  • Researched and wrote groundbreaking works on African American history
  • Managed The Journal of Negro History
  • Planned the first Negro History Week, which later evolved into Black History Month
  • Led efforts to promote Black scholarship and education

The Ongoing Celebration of Black History

Today, Black History Month is celebrated in the United States and Canada (February), the United Kingdom (October), and other countries. Each year, ASALH selects a theme for the month, and the 2025 theme, “African Americans and Labor,” highlights Black workers’ contributions to labor movements and industries. Schools, institutions, and organizations continue to honor Woodson’s vision by integrating Black history into their curricula and programs year-round.

Recognizing Woodson’s Impact

Woodson’s dedication to preserving and teaching Black history ensured that African Americans’ achievements would no longer be overlooked. His legacy lives on through the work of ASALH, the continued observance of Black History Month, and the recognition of African American contributions across multiple sectors. Thanks to his efforts, the study of Black history has become an essential part of American education and culture.

As we celebrate Black History Month, we honor Carter G. Woodson’s vision and commitment to historical truth, education, and cultural preservation. His pioneering work remains a cornerstone of African American history and a testament to the power of knowledge in shaping a more inclusive society.

Mentoring and Training

Woodson was a mentor to many up-and-coming historians and scholars, including Alrutheus A. Taylor, Charles H. Wesley, Luther Porter Jackson, Lorenzo Johnston Greene, Rayford W. Logan, Lawrence D. Reddick, and John Hope Franklin. The association’s headquarters—Woodson’s home—served as a training center where these scholars refined their research skills and, in turn, mentored succeeding generations of African American historians. Woodson and ASALH also cultivated important relationships with Black churches, colleges, universities, schools, and community centers nationwide.

Carter G. Woodson Home NHS Temporarily Closed

The Carter G. Woodson Home National Historic Site is currently temporarily closed due to renovation. Please visit the National Park Service website for updates on its reopening.

Atlanta Dream Grind Out 82–75 Road Win Behind Historic Night From Rhyne Howard and Angel Reese

Angel Reese and Rhyne Howard scored 17 points apiece as the Atlanta Dream defeated the Chicago Sky 82-75, improving to 3-1 in Commissioner’s Cup play.

By Milton Kirby | Chicago, IL | June 10, 2026

The Atlanta Dream leaned on their most reliable lineup and a dominant rebounding performance from Angel Reese to secure an 82–75 win over the Chicago Sky at Wintrust Arena on Monday night. The victory moves Atlanta to 8–2 when starting the combination of Jordin Canada, Allisha Gray, Rhyne Howard, Naz Hillmon, and Angel Reese, a unit that continues to define the Dream’s identity on both ends of the floor.

The win also pushes Atlanta to 31–37 all‑time against Chicago and 15–18 on the road in the series. More importantly, it lifts the Dream to 3–1 in Commissioner’s Cup play, bringing their total to $10,000 raised for The King Center, the team’s designated charity.


Rhyne Howard brings the ball down court – Courtesy photo

Howard Makes History — Again

Rhyne Howard added another milestone to her rapidly growing résumé. With her 17‑point performance, she became the youngest player in WNBA history to reach 2,500 points, 500 rebounds, 500 assists, 200 steals, and 100 blocks. Only Diana Taurasi and Maya Moore sit anywhere near that company — and Howard reached it earlier than both.

Howard’s all‑around impact showed again Monday:
17 points, 5 assists, 3 steals, and steady leadership in the fourth quarter when Atlanta needed composure.


Reese Rewrites the Record Book

Angel Reese continues to make the extraordinary look routine. She tied her season high with 17 rebounds, becoming the first player in Dream history to record back‑to‑back 17‑rebound games.

Her stat line — 17 points, 17 rebounds, 4 assists, 2 steals — marked her eighth double‑double of the season and the 57th of her career, the most double‑doubles ever recorded through a player’s first 75 WNBA games.

Reese’s presence on the glass changed the game’s tempo, especially in the fourth quarter when Atlanta outscored Chicago 25–17 to close it out.


Hillmon’s Breakout and Balanced Scoring

Naz Hillmon delivered her best offensive outing of the season, scoring 16 points on 50% shooting, including three drilled shots from 3-point range, a wrinkle that stretched Chicago’s defense and opened driving lanes for Canada and Gray.

All five Atlanta starters finished in double figures:

  • Angel Reese: 17 pts, 17 reb, 4 ast, 2 stl
  • Rhyne Howard: 17 pts, 3 reb, 5 ast, 3 stl
  • Naz Hillmon: 16 pts, 6 reb
  • Allisha Gray: 14 pts, 4 reb, 3 stl
  • Jordin Canada: 14 pts, 6 ast

The Dream also shot a blistering 93.8% from the free‑throw line (15–16), a key separator in a game that stayed tight through three quarters.


How the Game Unfolded

Atlanta opened with an 18–17 edge after the first quarter, but Chicago responded with a strong second frame to take a 42–39 halftime lead. The Dream tightened their defense in the third, holding the Sky to just 16 points, and then closed the game with their most efficient offensive quarter of the night.

Chicago’s Kahleah Copper‑replacement, Natasha Cloud, led the Sky with 18 points, while Kamilla Cardoso added 5 assists and Azurá Stevens pulled down 7 rebounds.

But Chicago couldn’t match Atlanta’s balance, physicality, or late‑game execution.


Starting Lineups

Atlanta Dream:
Jordin Canada, Allisha Gray, Rhyne Howard, Naz Hillmon, Angel Reese

Chicago Sky:
Skylar Diggins, Jacy Sheldon, Gabriela Jaquez, Azurá Stevens, Kamilla Cardoso

Atlanta played without Brionna Jones (right knee) and Amy Okonkwo (coach’s decision). Chicago was without DiJonai Carrington, Rickea Jackson, and Courtney Vandersloot.


Final Score Atlanta 82, Chicago 75 (18–17 | 21–25 | 18–16 | 25–17)


Support open, independent journalism—your contribution helps us tell the stories that matter most.

Who and Where Will You Be When History Calls?

By Lola Renegade | June 9, 2026

“The ultimate measure of a man (woman) is not where he (she) stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he (she) stands at times of challenge and controversy.”

 — Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

I watched Trevor Noah Netflix special Joy in the Trenches over the weekend. He posed a question that refuses to vacate my thoughts: Who will you be when history calls? I added “where.”

It is a simple question, yet it may be one of the most important questions any generation can answer. History is not merely a record of people, places, events, presidents, wars, elections, and legislation. History is a record of who stood up, who sat down, who spoke out, and who remained silent. Every generation eventually arrives at a moment when saying and doing nothing becomes impossible.

For people of color in America and our allies, that moment has arrived once again. Under the Trump Administration, hard-fought gains in civil rights, voting rights, diversity initiatives, economic opportunity, and equal protection are under unprecedented attack. The stakes are high and the consequences will be felt for generations. It is long past the time that each of us must decide whether to stand idly by watching and benefitting while others do all the heavy lifting. Or it is time to step up to do your part to help shape history and to deal the final deathblow to injustice in a way that this part will never need to be revisited again.

In 1961, a group of extraordinarily brave Americans – both Black and white, the Freedom Riders, boarded buses bound for the Deep South to challenge segregation and force this nation to confront its lack of conscience. Many were barely out of their teens. Some were college students. Some were clergy. Before departing, many wrote their wills and letters to loved ones, fully aware they might never return home alive.

They faced firebombs, beatings, imprisonment, and the very real possibility of death, not for personal gain, but for the promise of a more just America. They challenged segregated seats on buses, at lunch counters, and helped change the course of history. More than six decades later, the buses are different, but the destination for full equality remains the same.

Many others before us made tremendous sacrifices and answered the call and because of them, many of our lives are better.

History called Harriet Tubman, and she answered by risking her freedom and her life to lead others out of bondage. History called Ida B. Wells, and she answered by exposing the horrors of lynching when much of America preferred ignorance over truth. History called Frederick Douglass, and he answered by standing before a nation celebrating liberty and asking what the Fourth of July meant to millions who remained enslaved. History called Fannie Lou Hamer, and she answered by exposing before the nation the violence and terror inflicted upon Black citizens who dared to exercise their constitutional right to vote. History called Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and he answered from a Birmingham jail cell, reminding America that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere and warning that the silence of good people often proves more dangerous than the actions of the openly wicked.

Every generation inherits unfinished work. Today, history is calling once again. It is calling in an era marked by fierce debates over voting rights, education, immigration, access to medical care, judicial power, economic inequality, and the future of democratic institutions. It is calling as election deniers and fake electors continue to seek and win positions of influence. It is calling as public trust in elections has eroded and facts themselves are increasingly filtered through partisan loyalties. It is calling amid debates surrounding Project 2025, presidential immunity, executive power, and the return of Donald Trump to the presidency despite felony convictions that, in previous eras, might have ended a political career. It is calling as participants in the January 6 insurrection are viewed by some as criminals and by others as patriots. It is calling as America wrestles once again with old questions about race, power, citizenship, and whose voices matter in a democracy.

Your children, grandchildren, and generations yet unborn will one day ask a question that no amount of wealth, status, influence, or self-justification will be able to avoid: Who were you, where were you, and what did you do when history called? They will not ask how many luxury vehicles, airplanes, and yachts you owned. They will not ask how many formerly colonized countries you visited, how many mansions you purchased, how many designer labels filled your closets, how many concerts or sporting events you attended, how many casinos you visited, how many strip clubs you visited, how many times you attended church as a false witness, how many violent and vulgar video games you played, how many degrading rap lyrics you wrote and produced, how many followers admired your social media accounts, or how many photographs documented your comfort and success. They will not care how much money you spent being entertained while the future of Black freedom and progress was on the line and being written around you.

They will ask where you stood. They will ask whether you defended democracy when democracy was being tested. They will ask whether you defended truth when lies became profitable. They will ask whether you defended the vulnerable when doing so was unpopular. They will ask whether you challenged injustice or accommodated it. They will ask whether you spent your resources merely pursuing comfort, consumption, and entertainment while future generations inherited the consequences of your indifference. They will ask whether you invested in education, justice, opportunity, and freedom or whether you invested only in yourself. They will ask whether your faith transformed communities or merely sustained institutions. They will ask whether you sought proximity to power or whether you spoke truth to power.

I am reminded of a simple truth: I eat fruit from trees I did not plant. I enjoy freedoms secured by sacrifices I did not make. I benefit from struggles, beatings, and deaths that I did not endure. The question before us is whether we will do the same. Will we plant trees from which we may never eat or enjoy their shade? Will we defend freedoms whose full benefits we may never see? Will we invest in a democracy that our children, grandchildren, and generations yet unborn will inherit?

Remember, “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” — Frederick Douglass

Who and where will you be when history calls?

Join Communities United for Justice in the fight for freedom and full equality!  

AI and Human Judgment: What People Must Protect as Machines Advance

Artificial intelligence is advancing with unusual speed, and much of the public discussion around it has focused on what machines can now do. People hear about systems that can write, summarize, translate, recommend, calculate, generate images, imitate voices, analyze patterns, and respond to questions in seconds. Those capabilities are impressive, and they continue to expand. Yet the deeper public question is not only what machines can do. The deeper question is what human beings must protect as machines become more capable, more persuasive, and more embedded in the routines of daily life. At the center of that question stands human judgment.

Human judgment is one of the most important protections people have in any age of powerful systems. It is the ability to weigh context, notice nuance, recognize moral significance, question appearances, and resist the temptation to confuse speed with wisdom. Judgment is what allows a parent to sense that a child’s problem is larger than the words being spoken. It is what allows a teacher to see the difference between fluent language and real understanding. It is what allows a doctor, pastor, employer, neighbor, or citizen to recognize that a case cannot always be reduced to data points and pattern matches alone. Machines may process information quickly, though judgment belongs to a deeper layer of human responsibility.

This matters because AI increasingly enters the spaces where judgment once rested more visibly with people. Search engines offer direct answers instead of pages of sources. Recommendation systems shape what people notice and what they ignore. Hiring systems help screen candidates. Financial systems flag behavior and assign risk. Educational tools help students produce polished responses quickly. Healthcare systems support prioritization and administrative review. Customer service platforms guide interactions through automated logic. In each setting, the machine appears to save time or improve efficiency. Those gains may be real. Yet every gain raises a deeper question. What happens when people begin to rely on machine outputs without preserving the habits of thought that allow them to evaluate those outputs wisely?

One of the greatest risks in the age of AI is the weakening of human judgment through convenience. A smooth answer feels satisfying. A quick summary feels efficient. A confident recommendation feels useful. Over time, people may begin to treat the first polished output as sufficient, even when it needs further scrutiny. That is where judgment begins to thin. Human beings can slowly lose the habit of asking where an answer came from, what it may have left out, what assumptions shaped it, and whether the result fits the lived reality of the situation. AI does not need to replace human thought entirely in order to weaken it. It only needs to make unexamined acceptance feel normal.

This concern reaches far beyond technical settings. In family life, parents and children now live in a world where machines can answer questions and generate language instantly. That can be useful, though it also changes the environment in which young minds develop. A child still needs to struggle, think, read, remember, revise, and grow through correction. Judgment matures through effort. It forms when a person learns to live with uncertainty long enough to reach clarity honestly. If every moment of confusion is met by an instant machine response, the child may gain speed while losing depth. What must be protected is not merely the child’s access to information. It is the child’s formation as a thinking and discerning human being.

The same issue appears in public life. AI-generated language, images, and audio can be persuasive, polished, and emotionally effective even when they are incomplete, misleading, or entirely false. This changes the conditions under which people exercise judgment. In earlier years, many trusted polished writing or realistic visuals as signals of credibility. That trust now requires greater caution. Human judgment becomes more important precisely because appearances are easier to manufacture. A person must now ask whether a piece of content is reliable, whether it has been confirmed, who created it, what motive may sit behind it, and whether its confidence matches its evidence. Machines advance by improving production. Human beings must advance by strengthening discernment.

The workplace offers another important example. AI can support drafting, analysis, documentation, scheduling, customer communication, and many other tasks. Used well, these systems can reduce drudgery and save time. Yet workplaces can also become environments where human judgment is subtly displaced by metrics, summaries, predictive scores, and machine-shaped assumptions. A manager may trust an automated summary without understanding what it omitted. A hiring process may narrow candidates before anyone sees the full person. A worker may feel pressure to produce at machine pace rather than think at human pace. In these conditions, judgment must be protected deliberately. Leaders still need to ask whether a recommendation makes sense in context. Workers still need room to think, question, and refine. Institutions still need to remember that accountability remains human even when assistance becomes digital.

Healthcare, finance, insurance, education, and public service all require the same caution. These are areas where decisions carry real human consequence. AI may help identify patterns, process cases, route requests, or support review. Yet no matter how sophisticated the tool becomes, the person affected by the outcome lives in a world larger than the categories a system can detect. Human judgment matters because life contains ambiguity, dignity, history, and moral weight that no automated process fully contains. A patient is more than a file. A student is more than an output. A family is more than a pattern. A citizen is more than a score. Protecting judgment means preserving the human capacity to see the person as a person.

Another reason judgment must be protected is that AI often produces fluent outputs that sound complete even when they are not. This creates a dangerous illusion. Fluency can feel like understanding. Confidence can sound like truth. Neatness can resemble wisdom. Human judgment is the faculty that interrupts that illusion. It is what asks whether the answer is adequate, whether the framing is fair, whether the conclusion is premature, and whether another perspective has been ignored. In an age of machine fluency, judgment becomes one of the last defenses against intellectual passivity.

Protecting judgment also means protecting certain human conditions that modern digital life tends to erode. Reflection matters. Pause matters. Reading beyond the summary matters. Listening with patience matters. Wrestling with a difficult question matters. Judgment does not usually emerge from speed. It grows through time, attention, memory, humility, and the willingness to remain in complexity without rushing toward the first available answer. Machines are built to optimize and accelerate. Human beings must protect the slower processes through which wisdom forms.

This does not require hostility toward technology. AI can be useful, and in many settings it already is. The task is larger than rejection or embrace. The task is governance of the human self. People must decide which responsibilities can be assisted by machines and which ones must remain rooted in human conscience, perception, and responsibility. They must decide when automation supports judgment and when it begins to replace it too easily. They must teach children, workers, institutions, and communities that there is a difference between receiving an answer and exercising judgment.

What people must protect as machines advance is therefore larger than a skill set. They must protect attention, discernment, moral seriousness, context-sensitivity, and the capacity to recognize that human life cannot be reduced to efficiency alone. They must protect the ability to say that a fluent answer is still weak, that a fast decision is still unfair, that a polished summary is still incomplete, and that a human being still deserves to be seen in full.

AI will continue to advance. Its presence in ordinary life will grow broader, faster, and more sophisticated. That reality calls for more than admiration or fear. It calls for steadiness. It calls for people who can use tools without surrendering their judgment to them. It calls for families, schools, employers, institutions, and communities that understand what is at stake. Machines may become more capable with each passing year. Human beings must become more deliberate about protecting the very capacities that make judgment possible.

© 2026 Truth Seekers Journal. Published with permission from the author. All rights reserved.

Support open, independent journalism. Your contribution helps us tell the stories that matter most.

SHADOW BALL: Learning More About Negro League History

June 9, 2026

This column exists for only one purpose: that is to answer your questions on Negro League baseball history. To that end, we need your help … if you are reading this column, enjoy it, want it to continue, and do not already know everything about Negro League history … then please submit a question on any aspect of Negro League history. Your questions are the lifeblood of Shadow Ball—they shape where we go next … players, teams, events, and more – and, in so doing, you will direct where this column goes moving forward. Your participation is important and appreciated. The very existence of this column depends on you. Submit your questions to shadowball@truthseekersjournal.com.

Curious George Atkins, Aurora, IL, posed the following question to Shadow Ball: “Why is the Negro League Baseball Museum in Kansas City?”

It’s a deceptively simple question. Negro League history sprawls across dozens of cities, each with legitimate claims to significance. So why Kansas City? To answer that, we must first consider the alternatives — and then the extraordinary convergence of people, place, and timing that made Kansas City the only choice:

Chicago had the strongest historical case, as it was the home of Rube Foster, the chief organizer of the Negro National League, its first league President, and the face of Negro League baseball as a player, manager, administrator, and entrepreneur for the preceding two decades in Black baseball. Chicago also had two teams in that first season, and, with the 4th-largest urban Black population in the country in 1920, was a major destination in the early stages of the Great (African American) Migration, which brought millions of Black families from the South to eastern, Midwestern, and far-western urban centers. Lastly, the Chicago American Giants won the initial pennant in that first season.

Other cities with teams in that first season of Negro National League baseball included Saint Louis, Detroit, and Indianapolis,, all of whom, like Chicago, had strong Black baseball histories prior to the formation of the league. Indianapolis had another historical point – the first game in Negro National League history took place there on May 2nd, 1920.

Another possible site could have been Ashland, KY, where several Negro League reunions took place in the decade prior to the opening of the Negro League Baseball Museum. In addition to the reunions, a substantial number of artifacts were collected and ended up in Cooperstown. But Ashland was a sentimental center, not a historical or demographic one.

My preference for my birthplace, Pittsburgh, is shaped by the presence of two of the greatest franchises in Negro League history and by the fact that more Negro League baseball games were played in Pennsylvania than in any other state in the union. Two other eastern megalopolises – New York and Philadelphia (which, along with Chicago, represented the three largest Black populations in the country) – had solid pedigrees in the history of the Negro Leagues and can be seen to have defensible cases, but …

In the end, the correct decision was made to place the NLBM in Kansas City due to a confluence of inarguable facts, talent, and civic leadership:

•           The Negro National League was founded on February 13, 1920, in the Paseo YMCA in Kansas City

•           A fortuitous gathering of local leadership came together, including Buck O’Neil, Alfred Surratt, Larry Lester, Phil Dixon, and Horace Peterson, all of whom lived and worked in Kansas City

•           The 18th & Vine redevelopment project, which included the Paseo YMCA, provided a ready civic partner, with several prominent KC mayors seeing value.

•           Kansas City’s Black civic and business community backed the project early.

•           There is no evidence that Chicago, Pittsburgh, or any other historically significant Negro League city ever submitted a proposal or was approached.

•           Eventually, such serendipity in the Paseo neighborhood continued when, almost four years after the Negro Baseball League Museum had opened its doors in one room in the neighborhood, Ken Burns’ nine-part documentary – Baseball – debuted on PBS. It made Buck O’Neil a star and opened interest and access to capital. Burns’ documentary did for the Negro League Baseball Museum what Eyes on the Prize did for civil rights memory — it created a national audience hungry for the stories the museum was uniquely positioned to tell.

•           The NLBM is currently poised for another expansion project. While still in fundraising for the $30 million project that includes tripling exhibition space in a newly rehabilitated Paseo YMCA Building; creating the Buck O’Neil Education and Research Center; building a new majority Black-owned hotel and new residential construction. According to the February 16, 2026, press release, the project could be completed by late 2028.

Last week’s Shadowball Significa Question of the Week: What Negro League pitcher, who participated in the Negro National League playoff in 1935, had a son who won two World Series games several decades later? Name this father/son pair. With no correct answer submitted, I am going to provide this answer and move on. Luis Tiant Sr, was a participant in the 1935 Negro League playoff, and his son starred in the 1967 World Series.

The Shadowball Significa Question of the Week: What Negro League pennant-winning team played their home games at Dick Kent’s Ballyard? Send your answer and any comments on the Negro Leagues to shadowball@truthseekersjournal.com or Shadow Ball, 3904 N Druid Hills Rd, Ste 179, Decatur, GA 30033

Ted Knorr

Ted Knorr

Ted Knorr is a respected Negro League baseball historian, a longtime member of the Society for American Baseball Research’s Negro League Committee, and the founder of the Jerry Malloy Negro League Conference as well as several Negro League Commemorative Nights in central Pennsylvania.

Beyond his research and organizing work, Ted is frequently invited to speak at sporting events, community programs, family gatherings, and educational forums, where he brings Negro League history to life. His deep knowledge of the players, teams, and the cultural impact of Black baseball has made him a trusted voice for audiences seeking to understand the legacy and significance of the Negro Leagues.

Please consider supporting open, independent journalism – no contribution is too small!

“Your Lungs Are Talking”: How the Respiratory System Works – and What It Tells Us

Learn how your lungs work, the early warning signs of lung cancer, and who should get screened. Understanding your respiratory system can save lives.

By Milton Kirby | St. Louis, MO | June 9, 2026

Series: Lungs, Lives, and Lessons – Part II

Part I of this series explored the misconceptions surrounding lung cancer, Part II turns inward, to the lungs themselves. Understanding how the respiratory system works is not just a biology lesson. It’s a form of self‑protection. When you know how your lungs function, you can recognize when something isn’t right.

How Your Lungs Keep You Alive

Every cell in the body needs oxygen. The lungs deliver it. When you inhale, air travels through the nose or mouth, down the throat, and into the windpipe. From there, it branches into the bronchial tubes, which divide again and again until they reach the bronchioles, tiny passageways that end in clusters of air sacs called alveoli.

Inside these microscopic sacs, oxygen enters the bloodstream while carbon dioxide leaves it. This exchange happens thousands of times a day, without conscious effort. The diaphragm, a strong muscle beneath the lungs, contracts and relaxes to pull air in and push it out.

The lungs also filter harmful substances, regulate air temperature, and support the sense of smell. They are constantly working, and constantly exposed to the outside world.

How Lung Cancer Develops

Lung cancer begins when cells in the lung mutate. These mutations can be caused by smoking, secondhand smoke, hazardous chemicals, or genetic factors. Once mutated, cells grow uncontrollably, forming tumors that damage healthy tissue and interfere with breathing.

The challenge is that early lung cancer often causes no symptoms. By the time people notice something is wrong, the disease may already be advanced.

The Warning Signs We Ignore

The body sends signals long before a crisis. But many people dismiss them as aging, allergies, or the remnants of a cold.

Warning signs include:

  • A cough lasting more than eight weeks
  • Shortness of breath after little or no exertion
  • Chronic mucus or phlegm production
  • Wheezing or noisy breathing
  • Coughing up blood
  • Chest pain lasting a month or more

These symptoms do not automatically mean lung cancer, but they do mean something is wrong. Early detection is key to successful treatment, and recognizing these signs can save lives.

Who Should Be Screened?

Low‑dose CT scans are the gold standard for early lung cancer detection. Screening is recommended for people who meet certain criteria, including age, smoking history, and risk factors. But many people who qualify have never been screened, often because they don’t know they’re eligible.

The upcoming symposium will offer onsite screening eligibility assessments, giving residents a chance to learn whether they qualify and how to access screening.

Knowledge Is Power

Part II of this series is about empowerment. When people understand how their lungs work, they can better protect them. When they know the warning signs, they can seek help sooner. And when they understand screening, they can take the first step toward early detection.

In Part III, we turn to the community and to the event bringing these lessons to life.

Support open, independent journalism. Your contribution helps us tell the stories that matter most.

Warnock Challenges Americans to Imagine What $70 Billion Could Buy Beyond Immigration Enforcement

Sen. Raphael Warnock is challenging Americans to consider what $70 billion could fund in education, housing, health care, and food assistance.

By Milton Kirby | Washington, D.C. | June 4, 2026

How much is $70 billion?

For most Americans, the number is so large that it is difficult to comprehend. U.S. Senator Raphael Warnock is attempting to make that figure more tangible as Congress debates a Republican-backed proposal to provide an additional $70 billion in funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Rather than focusing solely on the immigration debate itself, Warnock is asking Americans to consider an alternative question: What else could that money accomplish?

“The $70 billion that Senate Republicans will force through this week could fund universal pre-K for all 3-and 4-year-olds in this country for two years,” Warnock said in a statement released Thursday. “It represents the annual cost of groceries for nearly 11 million American households. Our government doesn’t suffer from a lack of resources. We suffer from a lack of imagination.”

The Georgia Democrat has emerged as one of the Senate’s most vocal critics of expanding ICE and CBP funding under the Trump administration. According to Warnock’s office, Congress approved approximately $75 billion for the agencies in July 2025. If the additional funding package passes, total funding would reach roughly $145 billion.

To illustrate the scale of the proposed spending, Warnock’s office released a series of comparisons spanning education, food security, health care, and housing.

Education and Child Care

According to the senator’s analysis, $70 billion could fund universal pre-kindergarten programs for all 3- and 4-year-old children in the United States for two years.

The same amount could provide free childcare for approximately 1.3 million children through September 2028 or cover two years of community college tuition for roughly 2.2 million students through September 2029.

Warnock’s office also estimates the funding could be used to double Pell Grants for undergraduate students, potentially expanding college affordability for millions of families.

Food Security

The comparisons extend beyond education.

The senator’s office estimates that $70 billion could cover the annual cost of groceries for approximately 10.7 million American households.

The funding could also provide free school lunches to an additional 22.7 million children through fiscal year 2029 or fund one year of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for approximately 31 million Americans.

For rural communities, the office notes the same amount could provide more than two years of direct payments to American farm producers.

Health Care Implications

Health care is another area highlighted in Warnock’s proposal.

According to the analysis, $70 billion could extend Medicaid coverage to approximately 2.2 million additional Americans through September 2029. The funding could also support an extension of Affordable Care Act premium tax credits for at least one year.

Perhaps most striking, the senator’s office estimates that the same amount would cover all annual insulin expenditures in the United States three times over.

The analysis further suggests $70 billion could address nearly one-third of Americans’ outstanding medical debt.

Housing and Homelessness

Housing affordability remains a growing concern across much of the nation, including Georgia.

Warnock’s office estimates that $70 billion could cover one year of rent for approximately 4.25 million Americans.

The same funding could provide $40,000 in down-payment assistance to every first-time homebuyer this year or support housing assistance for 2.4 million additional Americans through the Section 8 program through September 2029.

Perhaps the most ambitious comparison offered by the senator’s office is that the funding could support efforts sufficient to end homelessness nationwide for nearly eight years.

A Debate Over Priorities

The release comes as Congress continues debating immigration enforcement, border security, and federal spending priorities.

Supporters of increased ICE and CBP funding argue that additional resources are necessary to strengthen border security, enforce immigration laws, and support federal law enforcement operations.

Critics, including Warnock, contend that the proposed spending reflects misplaced priorities at a time when many Americans continue to struggle with rising housing costs, health care expenses, childcare costs, and food insecurity.

While lawmakers remain divided on the policy question, Warnock’s comparisons underscore a broader debate unfolding in Washington: not simply how much government should spend, but where those resources should be directed.

For voters trying to understand the implications of trillion-dollar budgets and billion-dollar appropriations, the senator’s challenge may be the most relevant question of all.

If $70 billion is available, what should America buy?

Support open, independent journalism. Your contribution helps us tell the stories that matter most.

What AI Means for Regular People: Power, Risk, and Daily Life

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly transitioned from a niche technical field to a fundamental pillar of modern existence. For the average person, AI represents a trifecta of power, risk, and daily reality.

By Florita Bell Griffin | Houston, TX | June 2, 2026

Artificial intelligence has become part of ordinary life before many ordinary people had time to decide how they felt about it. A few years ago, AI sounded like something reserved for engineers, giant technology companies, and futuristic debates about machines. Today, it appears in search engines, schools, workplaces, hospitals, banks, customer service systems, navigation tools, shopping platforms, and social media feeds. It helps draft emails, recommend products, flag fraud, sort resumes, summarize documents, and shape the information people see each day. The shift feels dramatic because AI arrived with unusual speed, and because its influence often enters quietly, through systems people already use.

For regular people, AI carries three large meanings at once. It represents power, because it can shape decisions and organize information at enormous scale. It represents risk, because error, bias, distortion, and overreach can move through those same systems with equal speed. And it represents a daily reality, because its effects now touch work, family life, learning, communication, trust, and access to essential services. The conversation becomes clearer when these three dimensions remain together. AI matters because power, risk, and daily life have now joined in one technology.

Power is the first part of the story. AI gives institutions and platforms a stronger ability to sort, rank, predict, recommend, and respond. In practical terms, this means a system can decide which application receives closer attention, which customer gets routed first, which product appears at the top of a page, which post reaches more people, or which pattern triggers a warning. That kind of power can look harmless when it arrives in small conveniences. A faster recommendation, a quicker answer, a cleaner summary, a more personalized feed. Yet behind those conveniences sits a larger truth. AI influences visibility, attention, and priority. It changes what people encounter first and what fades into the background.

For regular people, that matters because power over attention often becomes power over experience. A family searching for health information, a worker applying for a job, a student trying to learn, a consumer comparing financial options, or a citizen reading public news may all receive a reality shaped by systems they never see. The issue extends far beyond gadgets or novelty. AI helps structure the pathways through which people encounter knowledge, opportunity, and judgment. That is real power, even when it appears in ordinary forms.

Risk is the second part of the story, and it deserves equal seriousness. AI systems can sound polished, efficient, and highly confident while still carrying serious weaknesses. They can reflect incomplete data, flawed assumptions, inherited bias, or simple factual error. They can amplify patterns from the past in ways that feel objective, even when those patterns deserve scrutiny. They can give people a false sense of certainty because the answer arrives quickly and in smooth language. For everyday life, the danger often comes less from visible breakdown than from quiet overreliance. People begin to trust the shape of the output more than the quality of the underlying judgment.

This risk appears in many settings. In hiring, an automated process may narrow a pool of applicants before a human being looks closely. In finance, a system may flag behavior or assign risk scores based on patterns that feel distant from the person affected. In healthcare, software may support prioritization, pattern detection, or administrative sorting, which can help operations move faster while also raising concerns about fairness and transparency. In education, AI can support learning, though it can also weaken original thought if students learn to depend on instant answers rather than disciplined understanding. In each case, the issue returns to the same point. Speed and scale carry value, though speed and scale also magnify the consequences of weak judgment.

Daily life is the third part of the story, and for most people it is the most immediate. AI has entered the routines of ordinary living. People use it to write, edit, search, shop, plan, compare, ask questions, and save time. Employers use it in ways that shape expectations for workers. Schools use it in ways that shape how children learn and produce work. Platforms use it in ways that shape what families see on screens. Businesses use it in ways that shape service quality and consumer behavior. Public systems use it in ways that affect communication and access. This means AI is no longer a specialized subject for specialists alone. It has become a civic and household subject as well.

In the workplace, many regular people are already feeling the shift. AI can reduce repetition, streamline drafting, summarize meetings, analyze trends, and support customer interaction. For some workers, this brings relief and efficiency. For others, it changes the meaning of their role. Skills that once stood at the center of a job may move toward supervision, refinement, or interpretation of machine-generated work. That transition can create uncertainty, especially for workers who built value through effort, consistency, and experience in tasks that software can now assist. The real question for many people becomes how to remain valuable in an environment where machine speed influences expectations.

At home, parents and families face another layer of meaning. Children can use AI to solve, summarize, draft, and explain. That can support learning when guided wisely. It can also weaken habits of patience, concentration, and independent reasoning when used as a shortcut around real mental work. Families now need a deeper conversation about what learning means in a machine-assisted world. A polished answer does not always reflect deep understanding. Strong minds still grow through reading, reflection, practice, correction, and the gradual building of judgment. AI can assist that process, though human growth still requires effort that no machine can replace.

Trust has also become central to daily life under AI. Generated language, synthetic images, and lifelike voice outputs can move quickly through communities and appear highly persuasive. This places a heavier burden on ordinary people. They need stronger habits of verification, stronger instincts around source quality, and greater caution when emotionally charged material appears polished and immediate. The challenge is cultural as much as technical. Communities need a stronger public ethic around truth, context, and responsible sharing. In a world shaped by AI, trust becomes more valuable because appearances become easier to produce.

For regular people, the path forward begins with clarity. AI is a source of power because it shapes attention, priority, and decisions at scale. It is a source of risk because flawed outputs can move quickly and influence real lives. And it is part of daily life because it now reaches into work, family, learning, communication, and public systems. That understanding helps people respond with steadiness instead of confusion.

Regular people do not need engineering degrees to ask strong questions about AI. They can ask who designed a system, what kind of data shaped it, what incentives guide it, where human review enters, how error gets corrected, and whether a person can challenge a consequential outcome. They can teach children the difference between fluency and wisdom. They can remind employers, schools, and institutions that convenience carries responsibility. They can keep human dignity and sound judgment at the center of the discussion.

AI means many things for regular people, though its meaning becomes clearest when power, risk, and daily life are considered together. This technology is changing how people search, work, communicate, learn, choose, and trust. That change is already underway. The strongest response comes from awareness, public understanding, and the steady insistence that powerful systems serve human life with care, fairness, and respect.

© 2026 Truth Seekers Journal. Published with permission from the author. All rights reserved.

Support open, independent journalism—your contribution helps us tell the stories that matter most.

PART I — “Anyone With Lungs”: Understanding the Hidden Realities of Lung Cancer

By Milton Kirby | St. Louis, MO | June 5, 2026

Series: Lungs, Lives, and Lessons — Part I

Lung cancer is one of the deadliest diseases in America, yet many people still struggle to talk about it openly.

For decades, public understanding of lung cancer has been shaped by silence, stigma, and a persistent misconception: that only smokers get the disease. Physicians, survivors, and community health advocates preparing for a St. Louis symposium say that belief has delayed diagnoses and prevented too many people from recognizing their own risk.

As the HEAL Collaborative prepares for the June 27 community symposium, “Lung Cancer Screening to Treatment 2.0,” local partners Five Star Center, Inc. and Southside Wellness Center are helping connect residents to the conversation. The event will be held at the International Institute of St. Louis and is supported by Amgen. Together, those efforts are focused on one message above all others:

“Anyone with lungs can get lung cancer.”

It is a simple statement, but one that challenges decades of misunderstanding surrounding one of America’s most lethal diseases.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States, claiming more lives each year than breast, prostate, and colon cancers combined. Yet despite its impact, awareness surrounding lung cancer risk, symptoms, and screening remains dangerously uneven, particularly in underserved communities.

Many people still believe they are not at risk.

Others delay seeking care because they fear what a diagnosis might mean.

And some never discuss symptoms at all until the disease has already advanced.

For those involved in the St. Louis symposium, changing that reality begins with changing the conversation itself.

More Than One Cause

Smoking remains the leading cause of lung cancer, accounting for approximately 90 percent of cases. But medical experts stress that smoking is not the only risk factor, and not the only story.

Exposure to radon gas, secondhand smoke, air pollution, asbestos, uranium, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, nickel, and certain petroleum products can all increase the likelihood of developing lung cancer. Genetic history can also play a role, even for individuals who have never smoked a cigarette.

In many cases, exposure may have occurred decades earlier through industrial work environments, household conditions, or long-term environmental exposure.

For some families, the danger was never fully understood at the time.

That complexity is one reason health advocates say public education remains critical.

“Anyone with lungs can get lung cancer” is not simply a slogan for the symposium. It is a direct challenge to the misconception that only one type of person develops the disease.

The reality, health advocates say, is far broader and far more personal.

The Disease That Often Hides

One of the greatest dangers of lung cancer is that symptoms frequently appear late.

By the time warning signs become impossible to ignore, the disease may already have spread beyond the lungs, making treatment more difficult and survival rates lower.

Early symptoms can also resemble ordinary health problems people routinely dismiss:

• a lingering cough
• shortness of breath
• chest tightness
• chronic mucus production
• wheezing
• unexplained chest pain
• coughing up blood

Sometimes people assume breathing difficulties are simply part of aging. Others attribute persistent coughing to allergies, smoking history, or seasonal illness.

But health advocates warn that ignoring those symptoms can carry serious consequences.

That is one reason the St. Louis symposium will focus heavily on education, awareness, and screening eligibility conversations designed to help residents better understand when medical evaluation may be necessary.

While low-dose CT screenings themselves will not be conducted onsite, health professionals will be available to help attendees understand screening eligibility and connect attendees with additional healthcare resources and follow-up pathways.

“The goal is not to frighten people,” said Rachael Jones, Regional Director of Community Outreach and Advocacy Engagement for the HEAL Collaborative. “The goal is to make people aware of the resources available to help them access screening, understand their risk, and seek treatment early if needed.”

It is to encourage earlier conversations before symptoms become life threatening.

The Weight of Stigma

Early detection results in better outcomes.

Lung cancer carries a unique stigma that many survivors and families say separates it from other major diseases.

Patients are often asked one question almost immediately after revealing their diagnosis:

“Did you smoke?”

For some families, that question can feel less like concern and more like blame.

Advocates say that stigma has real consequences. It can discourage people from seeking screening, delay medical appointments, and isolate patients emotionally during treatment.

Some individuals avoid discussing symptoms because they fear judgment.

Others incorrectly assume that if they never smoked, they are automatically safe.

The result is that misinformation and silence continue to shape public understanding of the disease.

Health advocates behind the St. Louis symposium hope to confront those misconceptions directly by creating a space where residents can ask questions openly, hear from survivors, and receive information without shame or fear.

The event is expected to bring together physicians, advocates, survivors, and approximately 150 community members for discussions focused on screening awareness, navigation support, treatment conversations, and the future of lung cancer care.

Two to three survivor speakers are also expected to participate, helping personalize a disease that statistics alone often fail to fully explain.

Why St. Louis Matters

According to the HEAL Collaborative, St. Louis was selected intentionally.

St Louis faces significant healthcare disparities

The June 27 symposium marks the collaborative’s second visit to St. Louis. At the previous event, 87 community members attended and seven were identified as eligible for lung cancer screening. Health advocates say those figures demonstrate both the value and the challenge of community outreach: every person connected to potentially life-saving information matters, yet many residents who could benefit from screening information and healthcare navigation services may still remain unreached.

Like many American cities, St. Louis continues to face significant healthcare disparities tied to access, economics, environmental exposure, and long-standing inequities in medical outcomes.

Black and Brown communities in particular often experience lower screening rates and poorer lung cancer survival outcomes.

Those disparities are part of the reason health advocates believe community-based education efforts remain so important.

Events like “Lung Cancer Screening to Treatment 2.0” are designed not only to raise awareness, but also to help close gaps in information and access before diagnoses become more severe.

The symposium will include conversations on pulmonology care, navigation support, medical debt, the role of artificial intelligence in future lung cancer treatment, and the impact stigma can have on care and outcomes.

Lunch will be provided, and organizers say the free event is intended to be welcoming, accessible, and community centered.

At its core, the symposium is built around a belief that education itself can become a form of prevention.

A Conversation That Cannot Wait

For many Americans, lung cancer remains something that happens to “other people.”

But advocates say that perception continues to cost lives.

Part I of this three-part series begins with the misconceptions because health advocates believe understanding risk is the first step toward improving outcomes.

In Part II, we will look deeper inside the lungs themselves, exploring how lung cancer develops, how symptoms are often overlooked, and why early detection can dramatically improve survival chances.

For now, the message symposium leaders hope residents carry with them is straightforward:

Lung cancer is not simply a smoker’s disease.

It is a human disease.

And it is one communities can no longer afford to ignore.

For more information HEAL Collaborative

To Register

Global Grub Alley to Turn Walton Street Into a World Cup Food Haven

Atlanta’s Global Grub Alley turns Walton Street into a vibrant food truck corridor for FIFA World Cup 2026™, spotlighting local flavors and small business culture.

By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | May 31, 2026

When the FIFA World Cup 2026™ arrives in Atlanta, the city’s streets will serve up more than soccer fever. They’ll serve food — and plenty of it.

Showcase Atlanta and the Food Truck Association of Georgia (FTAG) have announced Global Grub Alley, a pedestrian‑only food truck corridor that will transform Walton Street into a culinary destination for every match day and the day before each game. The activation will feature 20 to 30 Atlanta‑area food trucks operating daily from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m., stretching a quarter‑mile between Centennial Olympic Park Drive and Broad Street.

The corridor, just steps from the official FIFA Fan Festival at Centennial Olympic Park, will be free and open to the public — no ticket required. Fans walking between the park and Mercedes‑Benz Stadium will pass directly through the food truck zone, creating a seamless connection between the city’s global celebration and its local flavor.

“Atlanta food trucks have been asking for this kind of moment for years,” said Kelsey Maynor, Director of Small Business Engagement for Showcase Atlanta. “Global Grub Alley puts our small business owners and our food culture on the street, next to the biggest stage in the world. You will not need a ticket to be a part of it. You will just need to be hungry.”

Atlanta will host eight World Cup matches, meaning sixteen days of Global Grub Alley activity spread across the tournament. The initiative is part of Showcase Atlanta’s broader strategy to ensure that major global events — including the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Super Bowl — leave lasting opportunities for local entrepreneurs.

FTAG will manage vendor selection and compliance through Street Food Finder, the industry‑standard scheduling platform.

“Our members are some of the most resilient small business owners in this state,” said Montrella Rhodes, FTAG Administrator. “A truck on Walton Street in front of a global audience is a truck whose phone keeps ringing in 2027 and 2028.”

Among the early participants is Wing Kingh Food Truck, whose owner Sherman Gartrell sees the event as more than a business opportunity.

“For us, this is about bringing people together through great flavors, culture, and hospitality,” Gartrell said. “Global Grub Alley helps food truck businesses gain valuable exposure and build lasting relationships.”

Vendor applications are now open, with priority given to FTAG members. Trucks must meet Georgia permitting and compliance requirements. A full lineup will be released closer to match dates at streetfoodfinder.com/global-grub-alley.


If You Go

  • Location: Walton Street between Centennial Olympic Park Drive and Broad Street
  • Hours: 11 a.m. – 7 p.m., all match days and the day before each match
  • Cost: Free entry; pay per item at each truck
  • Accessibility: Street‑level access, portable restrooms on site
  • Transit: MARTA’s GWCC/CNN Center and Five Points stations within walking distance

Global Grub Alley promises to be more than a food event — it’s a statement of Atlanta’s identity: a city where global celebration meets local flavor, and where small businesses stand shoulder‑to‑shoulder with the world’s biggest stage.

Truth Seekers Journal thrives because of readers like you. Join us in sustaining independent voices.

Black Women Nannies and White Babies: Loving, Nurturing, and Caring for the Children Who May One Day Grow Up to Hate You Simply Because of the Color of Your Skin

By Lola Renegade | Atlanta, GA | May 30, 2026 |

A couple of days ago, while visiting the Atlanta History Center with my great niece and nephew – my proxy grandchildren –  I noticed something that stayed with me long after I left.

Everywhere I turned, I saw several Black women caring for little white children.

Some carried babies on their hips. Others pushed strollers through the museum corridors and gardens. Some held tiny white hands as curious toddlers wandered through exhibits laughing, pointing, and exploring the world with complete innocence and trust.

At first, seeing one Black nanny seemed unremarkable.

But after witnessing it again and again, I felt history pressing against and piercing my spirit. I found myself thinking, “I know this story personally.”

I recall my mother,  along with several of my aunts, and countless other Black women, worked as domestics in Mississippi during the brutal decades of Jim and Jane Crow throughout the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. They cared for white children whose parents were often half their age or younger, and eventually the children themselves, called them by their first names, as though these grown Black women were perpetual children themselves, undeserving of the dignity and respect automatically granted to white adults.

In the South of that era, Black women and men were rarely addressed with basic respect. White children were taught early that Black adults – even elderly Black adults – did not deserve titles such as “Miss,” “Mrs.,”  or “Mr.”

Imagine the psychological violence and trauma of that. Imagine helping to raise a child, pouring love, patience, and tenderness into their life, only to see many grow into adults who embraced the same prejudices, racial hatred, and moral corrosion that had been passed down to them for generations by grandparents, parents, institutions, and an America determined to preserve racial hierarchy.

What greater tragedy is there than witnessing a child’s humanity slowly poisoned by the very parents entrusted to nurture it?

We have Child Protective Services (CPS) to rescue children from physical abuse, neglect, and dangerous homes. But who rescues children from inherited hatred? Who intervenes when racism, bigotry, and dehumanization become family heirlooms passed from one generation to the next?

Where is CPS when a child’s conscience is being corrupted, their empathy diminished, and their humanity stolen by the very parents, grandparents, and trusted adults charged with shaping their moral character?

Shouldn’t society be equally concerned and ready to remove children from their homes when they are taught to hate, fear, and to devalue the humanity of others?

Perhaps one of the greatest tragedies of racism is not only the damage it inflicts upon its victims, but the moral injury it inflicts upon the children taught to carry it forward. Teaching a child to hate another human being, not only diminishes the humanity of the hated, but also the humanity of the hater.

It was witnessing my mother and other Black women navigate those humiliations that shaped me in ways I did not fully understand at the time. Even as a child,  I made a vow to myself: no matter how poor, hungry, or desperate I might ever become, I would never become a domestic worker for white America. In the words of singer Lou Rawls, “I’d rather drink muddy water and sleep out in a hollow log.”

The relationship between Black women and white children in America did not begin with modern-day nannies or domestic workers. Its roots stretch back into slavery itself, when kidnapped, enslaved Black women were often forced to nurse white babies from their breasts while their own children waited nearby, sometimes hungry, neglected, or handed off to others. Few images capture the emotional and moral contradictions of America more painfully than a Black mother coerced to using her body to nourish the child of those who claimed ownership over her body, her humanity.

That contradiction has echoed through generations of Black women in America. What struck me most at the museum was not simply the presence of Black nannies caring for white children. It was the realization that, despite all America’s claims about progress, its incestuous kinship to slavery still exists in painfully familiar ways.

At The Gathering Spot in Atlanta, I have met several young Black women – brilliant, highly educated, accomplished women with advanced degrees – who lost professional opportunities during the chaos, instability, and cruelty unleashed within the early months of President Donald Trump’s attack on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In fact, it is stated that more than 300,000 Black women lost their jobs within the first few months under this racist, tyrannical administration. One can safely bet that if America stated that number, double it. This nation has long suffered from a pathology of lies – sanitizing and erasing its history, minimizing its crimes, and demanding the oppressed to forget what these modern-day robber barons would rather not remember.

Some of these young women now work as nannies for affluent white families, not because they lack intelligence, ambition, or qualifications, but because survival leaves little room for pride. Mortgages and rents still have to be paid, car notes still arrive, and student loans still demand payment.

I understand that for many survival does not and cannot wait for justice. It never has and it never will. Especially, if you are waiting for justice to live in America with any chance of longevity. And so these women, extraordinarily gifted beyond measure, have found themselves stepping into one of the oldest labor roles historically assigned to Black women in America: caring for white children.

That reality forced me to think differently about one of Trump’s most infamous statements during the presidential campaign when he warned Black Americans about immigrants “taking your Black jobs.” At the time, many dismissed the statement as ignorance, racism, or political theater from the man who would soon become one of America’s most corrupt, greedy, heartless, stupid, ignorant, morally and intellectually bankrupt presidents. But perhaps there was an uncomfortable historical truth buried inside that language. Because throughout American history, some of the “Black jobs” this country has consistently reserved for Black women have involved caregiving, domestic labor, emotional labor, and service to white families.

America’s and Trump’s replacements for our best and brightest have been mediocre to less-than mediocre white men and women. Amazingly, it took Trump less than ten years to turn America into a truly “shithole country” – the very name he has given to countries of color who refuse to be exploited by him and will not bribe him, his family, colleagues, and administration.

Black women have long been expected to nurture America while America simultaneously withholds full dignity from us. And what makes this history even more painful is the emotional intimacy involved. These are not distant transactions. These women rock white babies to sleep, celebrate first words, first steps, prepare meals, read bedtime stories, soothe nightmares, wipe tears, snot, and asses.

They become trusted figures in the emotional development of children who oftentimes grow up absorbing the same racial animus and systemic biases that diminishes the very women caring for them. How do Black women continue loving the soon to be unlovable under those conditions? How do you pour tenderness into children who may, more than likely, eventually inherit a worldview that sees you as inferior, threatening, or invisible?

Perhaps the answer lies in something both heartbreaking and extraordinary about Black women in America: despite centuries of degradation, exploitation, exclusion, and disrespect, many have refused to surrender their humanity and capacity to love unconditionally.

We all know that babies are not born racist. No infant instinctively hates Black people. Hatred is learned carefully and intentionally over time. It comes through family attitudes, political rhetoric, segregated systems, coded language, media imagery, fear, silence, and societal conditioning.

For a brief and innocent season of life, many white children experience unconditional safety, affection, and nurturing through Black hands before the world begins teaching them racial hierarchy and hate.

That truth sat heavily with me as I walked through the museum with my late sister’s grandchildren, thinking about her boundless capacity to love. She was a hospital executive and registered nurse. She, too, belonged to a long line of Black women who gave of themselves freely to family, work, community, and often to a nation that rarely returned the favor. Her capacity to love the unlovable was so much greater than mine. I can count on one hand, with fingers remaining, the number of white people I can or have called “friend” in my sixty-nine years on the planet.

In the movie, The Help, I am constantly reminded of a nation that never grows tired of exploiting the labor of Black women who are still carrying America’s children and America itself on our hips and our backs.

And if this America truly is the greatest country in the world – the very best the planet has to offer – then Lord knows the world is in desperate need of a better alternative.

Truth Seekers Journal thrives because of readers like you. Join us in sustaining independent voices.

Atlanta Hypertension Initiative Launches Coordinated Push to Reduce Heart Attacks and Strokes Across Metro Region

The Atlanta Hypertension Initiative is bringing health systems, churches, and community groups together to improve blood pressure control for more than 500,000 adults.

By Milton Kirby | Atlanta, GA | May 29, 2026

High blood pressure is often called the “silent killer” because millions of people live with the condition without knowing it. Left untreated, hypertension can lead to heart attacks, strokes, kidney disease, and other serious health complications.

In metro Atlanta, a growing coalition of health care providers, community organizations, faith leaders, public agencies, and national health organizations is working to change that reality through the Atlanta Hypertension Initiative (AHI), an ambitious effort designed to improve blood pressure control for more than 500,000 adults by 2030.

Built on a mission “to advance cardiovascular health for all and reduce related health inequities by building a lasting collaborative effort for Atlanta,” the initiative represents one of the region’s most comprehensive approaches to tackling cardiovascular disease.

Unlike traditional awareness campaigns, AHI combines community outreach, clinical improvement, education, training, and collaboration into a long-term strategy aimed at creating lasting change.

A Region Facing a Serious Health Challenge

The need is substantial.

Nationally, nearly half of U.S. adults have hypertension. Yet only about one in four has the condition under control. The consequences are severe. High blood pressure remains one of the leading causes of heart attacks, strokes, and preventable deaths across the country.

The burden is especially significant in metro Atlanta.

According to AHI data, approximately one-third of adults across the region report having high blood pressure. In some communities, the numbers are even higher. Clayton County reports a self-reported hypertension prevalence of 40.3 percent, while DeKalb County stands at 35.5 percent, Fulton County at 33.7 percent, and Gwinnett County at 32.4 percent.

Health leaders note that the actual burden is likely even greater because many people remain unaware they have hypertension until serious complications develop.

The initiative has identified Fulton, DeKalb, Douglas, Cobb, and Gwinnett counties as priority areas for concentrated engagement and support while continuing to welcome participation from organizations and residents throughout the broader 11-county metropolitan region.

A Collective Effort

The Atlanta Hypertension Initiative is grounded in a simple belief: no single organization can solve the region’s hypertension crisis alone.

The initiative brings together partners from public health, health care, academia, government, faith communities, and community-based organizations to advance equitable hypertension control through collaboration, capacity building, and clinical quality improvement.

AHI is co-led by the CDC Foundation, the Atlanta Regional Collaborative for Health Improvement (ARCHI), the American Medical Association, and the Metro Atlanta American Heart Association, with foundational support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Together, these organizations are working to improve awareness, treatment, and blood pressure control while addressing many of the barriers that contribute to health disparities throughout metro Atlanta.

More Than Awareness

One of the initiative’s distinguishing features is its emphasis on providing practical tools and resources that residents can use to improve their health.

Through community outreach programs, AHI supports blood pressure screenings, patient education programs, health fairs, and community events designed to help residents better understand hypertension and the steps they can take to manage it.

AHI classroom discussion

The initiative also promotes innovative programs such as “Low Pressure Parties,” community-based events that make learning about blood pressure, nutrition, physical activity, and healthy living engaging and accessible.

Residents can also benefit from educational materials, connections to care, and resources that help them navigate the health care system and better manage chronic conditions.

For organizations and health care providers, AHI offers technical assistance, training opportunities, quality improvement resources, peer-learning collaboratives, and implementation support.

Expanding Access to Home Monitoring

A major focus of the initiative is increasing access to self-measured blood pressure monitoring.

Research has shown that individuals who regularly monitor their blood pressure at home are often better able to manage hypertension and work with their health care providers to improve outcomes.

To support that effort, AHI helps distribute validated home blood pressure monitors and provides education on how to use them correctly. The initiative also offers training and technical assistance to organizations interested in implementing self-monitoring programs.

Community health workers play an important role in this strategy by helping residents understand their readings, connect with care, and stay engaged in treatment plans.

Reaching Communities Where They Are

AHI places particular emphasis on reaching populations disproportionately affected by hypertension, especially Black adults.

One of the initiative’s key outreach tools is the Live to the Beat campaign, a national effort designed to encourage Black adults ages 35 to 54 to take small, manageable steps to reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and high blood sugar.

By partnering with trusted community leaders, churches, neighborhood organizations, and local events, AHI seeks to bring health education directly into the communities where people live, work, worship, and gather.

Three Strategic Pillars

The initiative’s work is organized around three strategic pillars.

The first pillar, Community Capacity-Building, focuses on strengthening partnerships, infrastructure, and resources that support hypertension prevention and control.

The second pillar, Community Outreach and Campaigns, seeks to increase awareness and understanding of hypertension through culturally relevant education and engagement.

The third pillar, Clinical Quality Improvement Support, helps health systems and providers implement evidence-based practices that improve diagnosis, treatment, and blood pressure control.

Together, these pillars create a coordinated approach that spans both community and clinical settings.

Building a Network of Champions

Organizations can engage with the initiative as Participants or as Champions.

Participants stay informed, attend trainings, and access resources. Champions take a more active role by making measurable commitments to improve hypertension control through education, screenings, outreach, quality improvement efforts, and other evidence-based strategies.

Those commitments form the foundation of the initiative’s collective impact model, allowing organizations to contribute in ways that match their mission, resources, and capacity.

AHI blood pressure testing

Early Results Show Momentum

Although still in its early years, the initiative has already demonstrated significant progress.

According to AHI, more than 300 individual members and champions have joined the effort, representing more than 90 organizations throughout metro Atlanta.

The initiative has conducted more than 5,700 community blood pressure screenings, distributed nearly 300 home blood pressure monitors, secured 229 hypertension-control commitments, hosted dozens of trainings and learning events, and awarded clinic stipends to support self-measured blood pressure programs.

Several participating clinics have also achieved hypertension control rates of 70 percent or higher.

Looking Ahead

The Atlanta Hypertension Initiative’s long-term vision is straightforward but ambitious: a heart-healthy metro Atlanta where every resident has the knowledge, resources, and support needed to achieve and maintain healthy blood pressure.

As the initiative moves forward, leaders plan to expand the number of active champions, strengthen community and clinical interventions, increase public awareness efforts, improve data collection, and deepen collaboration across sectors.

The challenge remains significant. Hypertension often develops without symptoms and can go undetected for years.

Yet AHI leaders believe meaningful progress is possible when health systems, community organizations, churches, employers, and residents work together.

Through education, screenings, home monitoring, quality improvement, and community engagement, the Atlanta Hypertension Initiative is pursuing a simple but ambitious goal: reducing heart attacks and strokes while helping hundreds of thousands of metro Atlantans live longer, healthier lives.

Related articles

Wear Your Health on Your Sleeve

Red Shoe Lunch Marks 16 Years of Sisterhood, Survival, and a Mission to Save Lives

Truth Seekers Journal thrives because of readers like you. Join us in sustaining independent voices.

DeKalb Leaders Highlight Public Safety Gains, Housing Initiatives, and Infrastructure Investments During Quarterly Town Hall

DeKalb County leaders outlined major public safety, housing, infrastructure, and redevelopment initiatives during a wide-ranging quarterly town hall led by CEO Lorraine Cochran-Johnson.

By Milton Kirby | Decatur, GA | May 28, 2026

DeKalb County CEO Lorraine Cochran-Johnson and members of her executive leadership team presented an expansive vision and report on progress for modernization, redevelopment, public safety, infrastructure repair, and housing investment during the county’s first-quarter town hall Wednesday evening at the Porter Sanford III Performing Arts & Community Center.

The nearly two-hour meeting combined department updates, resident questions, and long-term planning discussions as county officials outlined efforts aimed at addressing aging infrastructure, blight, housing affordability, crime reduction, and economic development across DeKalb County.

“This evening, you will hear a report directly from all of the individuals that we have here on this stage,” Cochran-Johnson told attendees. “With 34 different divisions, there are a lot of people who are responsible for the work that you experience each and every day.”

Throughout the evening, county leaders repeatedly emphasized what Cochran-Johnson described as a broader effort to “move with purpose” while modernizing county government systems that, in some cases, officials said had been neglected for years.

Public Safety and Crime Reduction

Public safety emerged as one of the town hall’s central themes.

County officials highlighted increased police recruitment, improved retention, investments in technology, and the continued rollout of DeKalb’s Real Time Crime Center.

According to Tony Hughes, Assistant Chief, DeKalb County Police Department, police recruitment has increased by more than 300 percent since Cochran-Johnson took office, while retention rates now stand at approximately 98 percent.

“When I came into office, for over a four-year period, we lost 385 police officers,” Cochran-Johnson said. “We were at a critical level.”

Assistant Chief Tony Hughes said property crimes are down approximately 25 percent while crimes against persons have also declined.

Officials credited part of that reduction to increased officer presence, new compensation packages, surveillance technology, and the county’s growing use of real-time policing tools.

The county formally opened its Real Time Crime Center in December 2025. Officials said the system integrates traffic cameras, Flock safety cameras, business surveillance systems, and drone technology to improve emergency response and investigations.

“We have been intentional in strategically placing drones and technology,” Cochran-Johnson said. “I would like us to get to the point where we’re never more than three minutes away.”

County leaders also discussed the ongoing crackdown on illegal street racing and intersection takeovers.

Officials said the county’s street takeover initiative has resulted in more than 200 citations, 41 arrests, and the impoundment of multiple vehicles connected to illegal racing activity.

“We cannot continue to allow people to be lawless in our communities,” Cochran-Johnson said. “Crime will show up at your front door.”

The county also highlighted upgrades to its E-911 system, including investments in artificial intelligence tools designed to improve call management during high-volume emergencies.

Infrastructure, Roads, and Aging Systems

Road resurfacing, storm water infrastructure, and aging county systems generated some of the evening’s most detailed discussions.

Public Works Deputy Director Peggy Allen explained that DeKalb now uses a pavement condition index system to evaluate more than 7,200 road segments annually. Roads are graded using a “worst first” philosophy to prioritize resurfacing projects.

County officials said DeKalb resurfaced approximately 120 miles of roadway annually through the Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax program, commonly known as SPLOST.

However, officials acknowledged that rising costs continue to create challenges.

According to Allen, resurfacing costs that averaged approximately $450,000 per mile in 2018 have now increased to as much as $900,000 to $1 million per mile in some cases.

“We can do no more than we have expendable income to do,” Cochran-Johnson said.

Officials also discussed DeKalb’s aging storm water infrastructure, including failing culverts, damaged drainage systems, and deteriorating pipes.

Allen said the county maintains more than 500 miles of storm water pipe, 22,000 catch basins, nearly 1,000 detention ponds, and more than 200 bridges.

“Our inventory is huge, and our inventory is aging,” Allen said.

Recent heavy rainfall has intensified concerns about flooding and infrastructure failures in several areas of the county.

County officials said storm water upgrades and sewer rehabilitation efforts remain ongoing under federally mandated infrastructure improvement programs.

Housing, Redevelopment, and Economic Growth

DeKalb CEO Lorraine Cochran-Johnson & Chief Housing Officer Dr. Alan Ferguson greet unidentified residents.

Housing affordability and redevelopment were also major priorities discussed during the town hall.

Chief Housing Officer Dr. Alan Ferguson outlined several new county initiatives aimed at increasing homeownership opportunities and preserving existing housing stock.

Among the initiatives announced:

  • a new down payment assistance program offering up to $20,000 for eligible homebuyers,
  • employee homeownership incentives for DeKalb workers,
  • and home preservation grants providing up to $30,000 in repair assistance for qualifying homeowners.

“We want them to live and enjoy the fruits and benefits within DeKalb County,” Ferguson said regarding county employees.

County officials also announced faith-based housing partnership initiatives designed to help churches and religious institutions develop underutilized property for housing projects.

South DeKalb redevelopment efforts generated strong audience interest throughout the evening.

Chief Development Officer Jacob Vallo confirmed that discussions continue regarding the future redevelopment of South DeKalb Mall, which officials described as a key catalyst project for the area.

“Simply put, it’s mixed use,” Vallo said of the redevelopment vision. “Think restaurants, retail, housing, and green space.”

Officials also discussed ongoing transit-oriented development planning near MARTA stations, including Kensington and Indian Creek, along with major trail and greenway projects connected to the South River corridor.

Cochran-Johnson urged residents to remain open to strategic redevelopment and increased density in some areas if they want to attract additional retail investment and higher-income residential growth.

“Do not always say no,” she said. “Learn when to say yes and be specific on what you want.”

Residents Weigh In on Community Engagement

For some residents attending the town hall, the evening represented more than a government update. It reflected what they described as a more visible and accessible style of leadership.

Beverly Dabney, a retired JP Morgan Chase employee and longtime DeKalb resident, said she was encouraged by the administration’s focus on historically underserved areas of South DeKalb.

“Those are the really hard areas to develop,” Dabney said. “You have to get people on your staff that truly understand and are willing to work in those low-income areas.”

Dabney said she believes Cochran-Johnson’s administration has distinguished itself through communication and direct engagement with residents.

“Communication is key,” Dabney said. “The CEO makes her executive staff available so citizens can get immediate answers right away.”

She also praised the administration for holding regular public meetings that bring residents from multiple districts together in one location.

“This is an opportunity,” Dabney said. “A lot of times people think they have to call the CEO all the time, but she makes her leadership team present so people can address concerns directly.”

Dabney described Cochran-Johnson as “a people CEO,” adding that she believes the administration has shown a strong understanding of both county operations and neighborhood-level concerns.

When asked about the CEO’s command of the facts, Dabney said. “She studies the market, she studies the communities, and she understands what needs to happen in these areas.”

Her comments reflected one of the broader themes that surfaced repeatedly throughout the evening: residents want visible progress, but they also want consistent communication and accountability from county leadership.

Sanitation, Sustainability, and Illegal Dumping

One of the evening’s more animated presentations came from sanitation leadership, which outlined plans to modernize operations and expand sustainability efforts.

Director of Sanitation, Eugene McKinnie announced that the department is preparing a rebranding initiative intended to reflect broader environmental and resource recovery goals.

“Trash is cash,” Cochran-Johnson said while discussing sustainability initiatives.

Officials highlighted efforts to improve recycling education, composting programs, route efficiency, and waste diversion strategies.

The county also detailed its aggressive efforts to combat illegal tire dumping, which continues to affect portions of South DeKalb.

According to officials, DeKalb removed more than 37,000 illegally dumped tires during recent cleanup initiatives.

“These people have become so brazen that they will dump tires in front of a fully operational business in the middle of the night,” Cochran-Johnson said.

County officials said new drone surveillance, camera systems, and enforcement partnerships have helped identify repeat offenders.

The county is also exploring private-sector partnerships aimed at improving tire recycling and reducing long-term cleanup costs.

Residents Raise Concerns

While officials highlighted progress across multiple departments, residents also voiced ongoing frustrations involving potholes, blighted properties, flooding, illegal dumping, sidewalks, crime, and neglected developments.

Several questions focused on long-abandoned apartment and condominium complexes, including Brandon Hills, Walden Pond, and Whitehall Forest.

Cochran-Johnson acknowledged the severity of those issues and said legal action and code enforcement efforts remain ongoing.

“Brandon Hills, Walden Pond, and Whitehall Forest will not exist when I leave,” she said.

Residents also pressed officials on South DeKalb redevelopment, Memorial Drive revitalization, and concerns regarding abandoned commercial properties.

County leaders repeatedly emphasized that revitalization efforts require cooperation between government, residents, and private investment partners.

“We are doing fine in DeKalb County,” Cochran-Johnson told attendees near the conclusion of the meeting. “But we are going to have to work together.”

The town hall closed with county leaders encouraging residents to stay engaged through newsletters, community meetings, and county websites as DeKalb continues implementing long-term infrastructure, housing, and redevelopment initiatives.

Officials said additional public meetings and project updates are expected throughout the year as major initiatives continue moving forward.

SHADOW BALL: Learning More About Negro League History

May 26, 2026

This column exists for only one purpose; that is to answer your questions on Negro League baseball history. To that end, I need your help … if you are reading this column and enjoy it and want it to continue and you do not already know everything about Negro League history … then please submit a question on any aspect of Negro League history. Your questions are the lifeblood of Shadow Ball—they shape where we go next … players, teams, events, and more – and, in so doing, you will direct where this column goes moving forward. Your participation is important and appreciated. The very existence of this column depends on you. Submit your questions to shadowball@truthseekersjournal.com.

Last week’s Shadow ball Significa Question of the Week: What Negro League pitcher, who participated in the Negro National League playoff in 1935, had a son who won two World Series games several decades later. Name this father/son pair. With no correct answer submitted; I am going to let this question ride for another week. Who is this father/son duo? Send your answer and any comments on the Negro Leagues to shadowball@truthseekersjournal.com or Shadow Ball, 3904 N Druid Hills Rd, Ste 179, Decatur, GA 30033

Ted Knorr

Ted Knorr is a respected Negro League baseball historian, a longtime member of the Society for American Baseball Research’s Negro League Committee, and the founder of the Jerry Malloy Negro League Conference as well as several Negro League Commemorative Nights in central Pennsylvania.

Beyond his research and organizing work, Ted is frequently invited to speak at sporting events, community programs, family gatherings, and educational forums, where he brings Negro League history to life. His deep knowledge of the players, teams, and cultural impact of Black baseball has made him a trusted voice for audiences who want to understand the legacy and significance of the Negro Leagues.

Support open, independent journalism. Your contribution helps us tell the stories that matter most.

It’s Time for Cooperstown to Catch Up

Data and history confirm Negro League teams matched Major League talent. Ted Knorr urges Cooperstown to honor their rightful place in baseball’s Hall of Fame legacy.

By Ted Knorr | Harrisburg, PA | May 26, 2026

“In small cities and small towns across the country, there were other teams and other stars that may have been the greatest of the century, but whose deeds would live only in the memory of those who saw them play. Over the years, Black baseball stars played against White Major League stars at least 438 times in off-season exhibition games. The Whites won 129 of those postseason games. The Blacks won 309 (70.5%).” – Baseball, 5th Inning, Shadow Ball, Ken Burns, 1994

Appendix II of “The Negro Leagues were Major Leagues,” edited by Todd Peterson, pp. 214-226, lists 503 games, dates, and opponents, depicting games between Negro League teams and Major League teams. Negro League teams won 268 (54.6%), while losing 222, with 13 ties.

In addition to Burns and Peterson, I have seen compilations by historians William McNeil (69.8% in the California Winter League) and John Holway (57.1%), and researchers Scott Simkus (52.7%) and bench5 (54.5%). Every one of them finds the “so-called” Negro League teams holding their own (winning as often as losing) against “so-called” Major League teams. Comparable results are reported from both my interpretation of Seamheads Negro League Database (where 67 Negro League pitchers won 54.1% of their decisions against teams made up of Major League players) and Retrosheet’s Database (58.0%), with both showing an edge to the Negro League teams.

I have never seen a compilation showing the Negro League teams losing more than they win. While each of these compilations have their own circumstances (such as, the California Winter League usually featuring one Black team and three or four White teams meaning the White talent was diluted; and Ken Burns compilation is admittedly culled from oral history with few if any box scores.), my claim is unquestionably supported by these compilations and that is the record shows “so called” Negro League teams held their own against “so called” Major League teams.

Further factual evidence supporting my claim is provided with the following data:

Major League and Negro League Regular Season Slash Lines 1920-1948                    

                                   AVG    OBP    SLG    OPS                

Major League              .275     .340     .388     .728              

Negro League             .270     .331     .372     .703    

The 29-season slash lines on both sides of the color line are virtually identical.

Source: “The Negro Leagues were Major Leagues,” p. 19, edited by Todd Peterson, McFarland & Company, 2020. Major League data is from baseball-reference.com. Negro League data is from Seamheads.com, NL/RAG, and the Center for Negro League Baseball Research.

In concert with the  compilations of games between Negro League and Major League and the regular season data over 29 years being identical, the argument – accepted by Major League Baseball on December 16, 2020 – that the Negro Leagues were (indeed) Major Leagues has now been accepted by those who matter and by a growing number of informed baseball writers, researchers, and fans.

This editorial celebrates that December 2020 decision and advocates for a positive, logical, and similar decision by the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, a 501 (c) (3) educational institution with the responsibility of educating the populace on the history of the National Pastime. In the next issue of Shadow Ball, I hope to be more specific in my “advice” for the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum. Here are some points for your pondering over the next couple of weeks:

  1. The National Baseball Hall of Fame & Museum has done spectacular work in telling the history (and quality) of the Negro Leagues in a compelling fashion (as noticed, in my view, by most everyone but themselves).

— In 2021, they reinstalled a procedure, flawed but at least it is an improvement, once again providing the possibility by which Negro League players, executives, managers, and umpires could be elected and, in 2022, for the first time since 2006, successfully inducted two “executives,” Buck O’Neill and Bud Fowler

— In 2022, the Museum launched a Black Baseball Initiative, which involved partnering with Major League Baseball, Major League Baseball Players Association, Negro League Baseball Museum, Jackie Robinson Foundation, and others. This new initiative bore fruit in 2024 with

— in 2024, the Hall erected a new Hank Aaron statue entitled “Keep Swinging”, the new exhibit “The Souls of the Game: Voices of Black Baseball”, the integration of Black baseball accomplishments into existing exhibits throughout the museum was instituted, established an interactive youth activity “We Play” involving K-4 students in baseball history, celebrated the Negro Leagues East-West Classic, in collaboration with Dr. Gerald Early the Hall jointly published a book on, and inviting the Society for American Baseball Research’s Negro League Committee to convene its annual research conference in the Hall.

Ted Knorr – photo by Milton Kirby

— This litany tells us that the Hall’s heart is in the right place.

  1. In the right place in every corner of the museum except for its “namesake” Hall of Fame plaque gallery which honored 29 Negro League players twenty years ago and now includes only 28 – Frank Grant’s role having been inexplicably reassigned from player to executive … with no new Negro League players even eligible until the December 2027 election … only 17% of all Hall of Fame players debuting under segregation in that gallery are Negro Leaguers … this contrasts starkly with the parallel fact that just over 45% are players of color (i.e. Negro Leaguers) among players debuting since April 15, 1947. It is time for the Hall of Fame to match achievements with the rest of the museum.
  2. My recommendation to the National Baseball Hall of Fame & Museum is to induct additional Negro League players to the Hall of Fame. I recommend that we once again be focused on the 20 remaining Negro League players, executives, and managers on the 2006 ballot, plus Vic Harris. There is no need to wait until December 2027 … an election should be held in December 2026 with a qualified expert panel – as was done in 2006, a segregated Negro Leaguers only ballot (as in 1971-1977, 1995-2001 and in 2006), with a 75% affirmative vote requirement, but like in 2006 with an up/down vote on all 21 personages and no limit on the number of affirmative votes case by each voter.

If enacted, I can guarantee a great step will have been taken by the Hall and its mission will have been furthered immensely in keeping with the Black Baseball initiative begun in 2022.

Dear Readers, if you agree with my recommendation, please let the Hall of Fame know. It has been long demonstrated that they will not advance without a gentle nudge every now and then. Let them know 28 Negro League players is not enough. They can be reached at:

National Baseball Hall of Fame & Museum * 25 Main Street * Cooperstown, New York 13326

Truth Seekers Journal thrives because of readers like you. Join us in sustaining independent voices.

Congressional Black Caucus Presses U.S. Companies To Oppose Republican Redistricting Push

The Congressional Black Caucus urges corporate America to oppose Republican redistricting that threatens Black representation, calling it a defining test of democracy and corporate integrity.

By Matt Brown | Washington, DC | May 26, 2026

Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Black Caucus, described the letter as “putting corporate America on notice.”

The Congressional Black Caucus on Tuesday called on major corporations across the U.S., including those that previously expressed support for voting rights and racial justice, to oppose redistricting efforts by Republican-led states that seek to eliminate majority-Black U.S. House districts.

In a letter sent to more than 250 companies, members of the Black Caucus urge them to condemn the redistricting efforts, which the lawmakers describe as “coordinated efforts to silence Black voices at the ballot box.” Some of the companies had co-signed their own message to Congress five years ago urging lawmakers to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, a Democratic proposal to restore and update the Voting Rights Act.

That 2021 coalition, Business for Voting Rights, was backed by many of the country’s most valuable and influential companies, including Apple, AmazonGoogle, Meta, Microsoft, Tesla, Salesforce, Target, PayPal, Intel and Starbucks.

Tuesday’s letter is the latest effort by the Congressional Black Caucus and its allies to gather support for preventing more Republican-led states from redrawing their legislative maps in ways that would dilute Black political representation. Several states have moved to eliminate congressional districts represented by Black Democratic lawmakers after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last month that severely weakened a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

“Corporations that have profited from Black consumers, relied on Black workers, and amassed wealth in part from Black communities cannot look away while Black political power is dismantled in plain sight,” Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Black Caucus, said in an interview.

Clarke described the letter as “putting corporate America on notice,” but she said the caucus was not seeking an adversarial relationship with corporations. Among those receiving Tuesday’s letter were companies based overseas that have a significant presence in the U.S.

The caucus last week called for Black athletes to boycott public universities in states that are gerrymandering their congressional maps to eliminate districts held by Black lawmakers. The 59-member Congressional Black Caucus consists entirely of Democrats, including more than a third from Southern states.

Some lawmakers have said mass protests and federal legislation might be necessary to undo the efforts underway in Republican-led states. Any new federal voting rights law would almost certainly require Democrats to secure majorities in both chambers of Congress and win the presidency.

It is unclear how companies will respond to the demands. The Associated Press was making efforts to contact them.

“Many companies that previously issued statements after the murder of George Floyd, pledged billions toward racial equity initiatives, and spoke forcefully in defense of democracy following January 6 now face a defining test of whether those commitments were rooted in principle or convenience,” the caucus’ letter states.

It also represents the latest instance of the caucus expressing frustrations with corporate America. A 2024 Black Caucus report noted that lawmakers were “troubled that some corporations that made pledges in 2020 have taken several steps in the opposite direction,” such as rolling back or failing to follow through on pledges to diversify their workforces.

“We understand who the occupant in the White House is and the reality of Republicans being in charge,” Democratic Rep. Steven Horsford of Nevada said of the caucus’ message. “But what corporate America also understands is that there will be a shift at some point.”

The letter calls on companies to publicly condemn the redistricting plans, meet with Black Caucus members to discuss corporate America’s role in protecting voting rights and disclose their political donations to Republican politicians in states that are redistricting their congressional maps.

President Donald Trump last year kicked off the unusual mid-decade round of congressional redistricting when he pushed Texas lawmakers to redraw their maps in a way that would add Republican seats. Democratic-led California responded, but it has been mostly Republican states redrawing their lines since as the party tries to maintain its majority in the U.S. House during this year’s midterm elections.

The effort was supercharged by the Supreme Court decision, which allowed even more Republican states to redraw congressional maps that previously had protected minority communities.

Horsford, who chaired the Black Caucus during President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration, said the caucus is demanding that companies “stand on the side of democracy, fairness and equal representation.”

“This is about power, who holds it and what it’s used for,” he said. “And when you’re diluting Black economic and political power, we need to know where these companies stand in this moment, and what side of history they’re on.”

Truth Seekers Journal thrives because of readers like you. Join us in sustaining independent voices.

Exit mobile version